Michael T. Snyder's Shocking New Novel About The Future Of America
Beginning Of The End - Kindle Version by Michael T. Snyder
Survive After Collapse

Recent Posts

Archives

Emergency Essentials/BePrepared
Sold Out After A Crisis

Subscribe By Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

13 Nephilim Skulls Found In Mexico?

Nephilim Skull Mexico - Photo by Cristina Garcia Moreno INAH

So much of what we have been taught about ancient history is simply not true.  According to Mexico’s National Institute of Anthropology and History, a team of archaeologists working close to the Mexican village of Onavas has made an amazing discovery.  They reportedly found 13 ancient human specimens that had grossly elongated skulls.  You can find original photographs of this discovery right here, but the descriptions of the photos are in Spanish.  The Mexican scientists are telling us that these skulls are approximately 1,000 years old, and that no skulls of this nature have ever been found in this region of Mexico before.  So exactly what is going on here?  Are these elongated skulls simply the product of an ancient technique known as “cradle-boarding”, or is there another explanation?  Could these actually be Nephilim skulls that prove that an ancient race of hybrids once roamed the planet?  You might want to hold on to your hat – because the truth might shock you.

This group of elongated skulls in Mexico made headlines all over the globe when it was initially discovered.  A lot of people were really freaked out because a number of these skulls definitely do not look human at first glance.  A short video report about this discovery in Spanish is posted below…

So what would cause a skull to become elongated like that?  Well, without a doubt “cradle-boarding” (also known as cranial deformation, head flattening, or head binding) can produce an elongated skull in a young child.  And “cradle-boarding” is a decent explanation for most of the elongated skull specimens that we have found around the globe.

However, it does not explain all of them.  In fact, some elongated skull specimens have been found that could not have been produced by cradle-boarding.  Paranormal researcher L.A. Marzulli explained why this is the case during an appearance on Coast to Coast AM earlier this year…

In Paracas, on the coast of Peru, he and Richard Shaw, the director of the ‘Watcher’ series, visited a necropolis, a huge desert cemetery, and a museum that had some forty skulls originally from the graveyard. While some of the elongated heads were shaped by “cradle-boarding,” a type of skull binding that led to cranial deformation, others appear to be genuinely anomalous, having just one parietal plate, he detailed. Some of the skulls also have a large pronounced ridge, and a heart-shaped dome in the rear that can’t be achieved through cradle-boarding, he continued. “I believe we are looking at some sort of genetic manipulation…that are the remains of the Nephilim,” from around 3,000 to 3,500 years ago, he added.

For much more on this, check out the video that I have posted below of Sid Roth interviewing L.A. Marzulli about this amazing discovery in Peru…

Yes, without a doubt many elongated skull specimens were caused by cradle-boarding children when they were young.

But where did those ancient tribes get that idea?

Were they trying to emulate something that they had seen before?

Were they trying to emulate a race of people that had been ruling over them at some point?

Brien Foerster is another expert that has looked into this extensively.  According to him, there is no possible way that some of the specimens in Peru could have been created through the process of deliberate cranial deformation.  The following is a short excerpt from a recent article by April Holloway

Brien Foerster, author and expert on elongated skulls, has presented some of the most spectacular research on the subject. He has found that while most skulls show clear signs of deliberate cranial deformation, there are a percentage of skulls, namely those found in Paracus, Peru, which are anatomically different and which cannot be explained by practices of head flattening. These skulls, he said, have a cranial volume that is 25% larger than conventional human skulls (cranial deformation does not increase volume), and which weigh 60% more. Brien Foerster outlines further differences: “they contain two small holes in the back of the skull, perpendicular to the cranial suture present in the parietal plate of the skull. Every normal human skull is composed of 3 major bone plates; the frontal plate, which ends at the upper part of the forehead, and the 2 parietal plates which lie behind this, intersecting the frontal plate making a “T” shape. The holes are thought by Lloyd to be natural; every human jaw has a small hole on either side which is for nerves and blood vessels to exit and feed the tissue there; these 2 holes at the back of the skull may perform the same function for the elongated skull. The other factor is that there is only one parietal plate, where there should be two.”

But most scientists ignore this information because it does not fit in with their accepted version of ancient history.

Fortunately, there are some areas of science that are starting to catch up with the truth a little bit.  For example, the following is from a recent Huffington Post article entitled “Ancient Humans Had Sex With Mystery Species, New DNA Study Shows“…

The ancient genomes, one from a Neanderthal and one from a different archaic human group, the Denisovans, were presented on 18 November at a meeting at the Royal Society in London. They suggest that interbreeding went on between the members of several ancient human-like groups living in Europe and Asia more than 30,000 years ago, including an as-yet unknown human ancestor from Asia.

“What it begins to suggest is that we’re looking at a ‘Lord of the Rings’-type world — that there were many hominid populations,” says Mark Thomas, an evolutionary geneticist at University College London who was at the meeting but was not involved in the work.

Yes, the ancient world was most definitely more of a “Lord of the Rings-type world” than most people would ever dare to imagine.

Now of course the scientists in that article are still really grasping for straws to explain what the data is telling them.  The theories that they present to the media as “facts” are really just theories that they have pulled out of their own imaginations.

But what these scientists are starting to realize is that some really strange things happened to the human genome in the ancient world, and that is what the ancient texts have been telling us all along.

Many ancient texts (including the Bible) tell us that long ago a group of fallen angels mated with human women and produced a race of hybrid creatures known as the Nephilim.

In addition to the incredible testimony contained in these ancient texts, we also have physical evidence of this race of creatures still with us today.  In a previous article entitled “Has An Ancient Giant Handprint Been Found In A Cave In Nevada?“, I discussed some examples of this evidence including a giant footprint, a photo of a giant finger and a giant handprint that has been preserved in a cave in Nevada.

But the reality of the matter is that a group of giants could actually be protesting in front of the White House right now and a lot of people still would not believe this stuff.

Why?

Because it simply does not fit in with what they have been taught all of their lives.  According to the textbooks, none of this evidence is supposed to exist.  So most people will continue to ignore what is right in front of their eyes.

But the truth is out there – you just have got to be willing to go where it takes you.

About the author: Michael T. Snyder is a former Washington D.C. attorney who now publishes The Truth. His new thriller entitled “The Beginning Of The End” is now available on Amazon.com.

The Beginning Of The End - The New Novel About The Future Of America By Michael T. Snyder
Be Sociable, Share!
  • Tatiana Covington

    Always go for the simplest and shortest explanation. It is most likely to be true.

    Always use Occam’s Razor.

    If you hear hoofbeats then:

    probably there are horses…
    just perhaps there might be zebras…
    and certainly not any unicorns.

    • krinks

      Too bad this doesn’t come into play when it comes to considering the complexity of life. On this all bets are off and they push this ‘Pond Scum to People’ drivel.

      • Hannon

        Perhaps both ideologies are correct? I’m not a believer in the theory of evolution by any means, but I’m also pretty sure my @^$%head neighbor is retaliated Pond Scum :)

  • Kim

    Could be. No one believed the prophecy of Cyrus leading his army right into Babylon via the Euphrates river, in fact, its writing (Isaiah) was placed AFTER the event took place until the Dead Sea scrolls were found and placed the writing two hundred years before the event took place. In other words, archeological finds definitely have a way of verifying biblical history and prophecies.

    • dannyboy71

      They also thought the “Trojan Horse” was a myth until they found Troy.

      • Self Raising Lazarus

        surely the discovery of Troy only proves the existence of Troy not the Trojan Horse itself. The Illiad may still be a fanciful poem just based around a real geographical location. Like the Tain etc.

        • Ken Vinson

          The Trojan Horse is not in the Iliad haha

  • DJohn1

    The problem is maintaining the current “accepted” theories of how things began. Riddled throughout the Bible and other documents is a remarkable story of “angels” and an intermix between Humans and some other species.
    Which according to biology science should be impossible. Species have to be fairly closely related in order to intermix with one another according to science. Donkeys and Horses mix to become mules. In the history of mules we have about 3 second generation mules. The rest have been sterile.
    There is a difficult problem with matching up chromosomes between species because they have a different number. Donkeys have one number, horses have another.
    One of the books left out of the Bible was Enoch. There were probably 4 books of Enoch. I have read one translation of one book. As far as I know, it has been verified to be a legitimate ancient book, not a forgery as many have proved to be. I am no expert in this area.
    I do not know the ancient languages.
    The story there is of a mix between humans and angels. This contaminated the human species and God came down and saved Noah and family with the ark and wiped the entire human species from the planet with a great flood. The motive behind this genocide was the genetic contamination of our species.

    Surprisingly there are other Noahs and other arks in legends all over the planet. So Noah may or may not have been the only one with his extended family saved. We simply do not really know the answer there.
    The Japanese claim descent of their royal family from a mix with the “gods”. Abraham was described as being involved with a war between the “gods” and with the help of an army from Egypt defeated them.
    Noah is described as being “angel-like” in his appearance and was scheduled for destruction until an angel appeared and told his family he was pure. But that is all according to legends.
    The most dramatic evidence we have of alteration of our species is the double sized chromosomes of our species. All our nearest biological animal relatives have 48 chromosomes. We have 46 with two double-sized chromosomes. If you wanted to alter a species you might splice chromosomes to do so. The trick is to make it reproduce in the next generations.
    We have the most incredible error rate of any species on the planet. There are over 400 genetic diseases directly related to bad genetic information in our species.
    So if our species were altered, how would you generate new children while it is stabilized? A lot of people believe the “angels” did it. They used their women to bring children to term. That would involve changing the species reaction that would kill the children. Someone forgot to turn on the species protection . . . so the “angels” could reproduce with these children? No one really knows. There are a lot of hints throughout the Bible that this might have been the case. Including several references in Genesis. Genesis says there were hybrids that became men of legend.
    One of the legends describes a cone-headed people that were worshipped as gods. Supposedly these people were long lived, 8-12 feet giants, incredibly high I.Q.s and worshipped as gods. These legends are on both sides of the Atlantic in both South and Central America and Africa.

    I find it interesting that the Catholic Church in the 15-16th centuries took a lot of documentation from the new world and destroyed it as heretical and destructive to their belief system. Just exactly was in those documents that upset the priests of that time so badly? I suggest one of those ideas was an expression of a description of “gods” amongst them.

    These same people were using an inquisition to destroy anything contrary to their belief system such as the world being round and orbiting the Sun. One could be burned at the stake if you expressed ideas contrary to the accepted view. A lot of ideas contrary to this belief system were destroyed leaving us with no knowledge of the ancient past.

    The world is big enough that there is no way for these despicable people were able to destroy everything. But they did do a job on anything within their means.
    Only in the 20th century to the current day is there a recovery of knowledge.
    The people practicing Evolution theory are also responsible for covering up evidence. You seldom see them discuss chromosome numbers because it just doesn’t fit their theory. It isn’t that evolution is that wrong, it is that we have gone way beyond this 1860s Darwin theory that it is pathetic. Science has gone beyond that theory now. The exact process of change is better known now. That is why it sometimes looks like something out of a B grade horror movie. Chickens with reptilian traits through the use of electricity? Saw it on Discovery the other day.
    The significance of current day discoveries have many social implications. We are on the verge of changing the genetics after the fact. That means we can alter the aging clock of our genes. People could very well live 300 years.

    It will be interesting to me if an when these “angels” ever make a return to this planet. Our entire religious and social structure of the entire planet will have to adjust. Just like it did when Europe discovered the Americas.

    That is what is significant about finding “Cone Headed near Humans” in the digs. My question is there any genetic material there? Do they have a different chromosome number than ourselves?

    In the human line, I think we should make the chromosome number a significant event. Do Neanderthals have 46 with a double chromosome setup or 48 with normal sized chromosomes? Real Scientists have traced the event to about 225,000 B.C. give or take. From 225,000 B.C. to the current day is a lot of lost history . . .

    • David Maier

      The first book of Enoch was actually quoted in the New Testament… by… James, I think? “All the ungodly acts they have done in ungodly ways etc.” That is from Enoch. So at very least it is a very old book that was well known and respected enough for a disciple to use it. I think the other 3 books of Enoch may not be as old. Also, angels are something of an anomaly. They can appear human. When they do, are they genetically human? I don’t know. Can they appear as animals? Was Satan actually a serpent in the Garden or did he possess (control) a serpent?

      • dannyboy71

        I think man (Adam) was created perfectly by God. Satan, the serpent, seduced Eve thereby altering the DNA. Which is why the seeds of Cain were destroyed and the seeds of Adam, through Seth to Noah were saved. However, some of the “tainted seeds” survived hence all the genetic disorders.

        • David Maier

          I agree mostly. I think sin has corrupted us. Death came because of sin and I think it has had a decaying effect on our DNA. We now have all these diseases and genetic errors (the reason inbreeding is bad) but in Adam’s day, inbreeding was fine because the DNA was perfect.

          • Jack McCarthy

            Inbreeding is fine and it is out breeding that is bad.

            If you have a line with good health, good nature etc you do not invite in anyone else in without a lot of research. The governments of this world controlled by the elites want the well bred people destroyed from of the face of this earth unless they are of the chosen tribe. Race mixing is what (elites) satan’s children want for everyone but them.

    • Hannon

      Perhaps, the species(human and whatever) were the same, but the traits were different. For example, if you’ve never seen a dog before and you were presented with an Irish Wolfhound and a Chihuahua, you wouldn’t think that they were the same specie of animal, technically capable of producing fertile offspring, but they are. Maybe the human and the whatever population, came from the same family line but were separated by an interplanetary divide, time, dimension or in any other barrier beyond my current understanding. Maybe it’s as simple as, space traveling German Shepherds coming here and knocking up some Earth bond Golden Retrievers, so to speak?

      • DJohn1

        You bring up a very important point. These people are genetically compatible with ourselves.
        The other point is they are able to eat foods that we can eat. That suggests a compatible biology with our own. Dogs and cats are partially compatible with our biology. Cats for instance cannot eat chocolate without severe repercussions.
        Monkeys in the new world show this sign. We obviously are related to all animals but some closer than others. For instance, we normally have 5 digits on each hand. We normally have 5 digits on each foot. What is not well known is that squirrel monkeys and others in South America have a different number of teeth than old world monkeys. They have 36 teeth vs 32 teeth in humans and old world monkeys.
        The legends support a race with six digits on each hand. This sixth digit was a dominate characteristic and was often passed on to hybrid generations.
        I suggest these people have 48 chromosomes the same as the ape family does. That means that hybrids could be mules. That would mean two generations at most before the sterile nature of mules comes into play.
        Now if you have another world and that world has a compatible biology with our own . . . That suggests some kind of seeding program where life has seeded itself with a common biology not just here but where ever it is likely to survive. We are talking a long time period for something like this to happen. It also means things we eat every day might be poisonous to them and things they eat might be poisonous to us.

        Any contact with such life would obviously have significant religious implications. We are all ready running into that with the huge increase in advances in science over the last couple of decades. Astronomy by itself has come up with fantastic discoveries.

        Our view has gone from a Flat Earth at the center of the universe to a universe so enormous that it is hard to visualize.
        These Nephilim/aliens supposedly came from a planet with a higher gravity than our own. They supposedly were very long lived compared with us. There was a shortening lifespan effect if they stayed here too long.
        Which would explain why they left.
        This is all from legends and guesswork. We simply do not know for sure any of this.
        What we do know, if they are still alive, they might decide to come back sometime down the road. That if the legends are correct then they might have altered us for their own purposes. A Slave/Master relationship suggests itself in the past.
        Anyone with that sophisticated a technology does not need slaves in modern times. We can do much better with robotics. So motivation is questionable. More likely would be a colonization effort based on an idea that their planet might be dying. But if they plan to colonize here, what do they do with all those people?

        • Hannon

          You bring up some good points, that just lead to more questions. I think it’s safe to say, we don’t really know what happened or how we got here. I just wish, the main stream science would stop pretending like they know what happened, and say they weren’t sure. Then we could all just start pooling evidence, as it’s discovered and say, this is how it looks now, subject to change. Science is starting to behave the way the church used to, it’s like their safe guarding old theories and trying to make everything fit. On the other side of the coin, the alternative researchers need to stop pretending they have the whole thing figured out. It’s turning into a big freakin circus, and everything is starting to resemble fake left/right politics, instead of science and historical research.

    • J.Griffin

      The Book of Enoch is mentioned in the Bible,
      but the “books of Enoch” of the notorious “Dead Sea Scrolls”
      were written in “Ge’ ez”,
      which is a dead Ethiopian language,
      NOT Hebrew or Greek.

      The primary Ethiopian connection with Judaism was between
      Solomon and Bath-Sheba….
      some 700 years before the Dead Sea Scrolls.

      Solomon was also rather occultic and was essentially responsible for the introduction of MUCH paganism into Israel through his
      VAST harem,some 1,000 women.

      Many were foreign royalty that brought their priests,priestesses and practices with them.

      The notorious 6-pointed star (AKA the “HEXagram”) came through his influence-
      NOT King David’s,
      as long noted by the Encyclopedia Judaica up until recent times.

      Of the few people that accept the Ethiopian writings as authentic,
      even fewer know or care about the facts concerning them.

      Realistically speaking,
      they are merely rediscovered lore without pre-existing validation.

      Just because something has the same title
      does not mean it is the same book-
      even the Mormons reject those versions as being an authentic version!

  • prestodo

    Show me the comparative DNA taken from the skulls that were found. This is all just a bunch of BS until the DNA is made available to anybody to see if it is in fact human or something else entirely.
    Until then, I will simply say that there are people and have been people born all over this world with birth defects and genetic disorders such as Marfan syndrome that can account for these skeletons. Until you can show me actual DNA evidence that says otherwise, then I cannot believe the “nephilim” lie.

  • Ralph

    Maybe their dinosaurs

  • seth datta

    That Zacharia fellow who ‘enlightened’ us to all this is a shill. Also, Nephilim/aliens may exist, but this does not discredit the Bible or the truths contained within.

    • propel7

      It confirms the Bible, Enoch and Jasher. Genesis 6. Enoch 6. Can’t recall where in Jasher, but it does describe the “mixing” of the animals genetics there. Like Sphinx’s and minotaurs, etc. This is what they were doing to mankind and the animals, in my opinion to destroy the genetics of mankind to prevent the “seed of the woman”, Christ, from crushing the serpent’s head. They nearly succeeded. Only 8 people survived. “Noah was perfect in all his generations”. The question is, Why wouldn’t he be.

  • Jose Barrera

    “These skulls, he said, have a cranial volume that is 25% larger than conventional human skulls… and which weigh 60% more.”
    Too bad these super-brain people died out. Now these are the kind of Mexicans I would love to hire for my company!

  • Theodore

    Mike… I’m a little bit dissapointed by your interpretation of this text from the Holy Scripture…

    Yes, there were giants, huge men, the Bible is not the only ancient text mentioning them. But they were human beings, not hybrids. Angels (fallen or not) cannot breed with human beings. Angels have no body. Can the fallen angels be “the sons of God”? In John 8:44 Christ says devil is the father of the liars.

    The “sons of God” were the other sons of Adam, and the “daughters of man” were the daughters of Cain. I believe this has been the accepted interpretation of that text throughout the centuries.

    And the “aliens” mentions so often today are demons, and the UFOs are just demonic manifestations. There were studies of this phenomena that found that ALL people that claimed to have been abducted by aliens had been previously involved in spiritism/occult activities, and the “abductions” were nothing else but demonic possession.

    If you have a few minutes, search the web for “UFOs : The shattering Assault”, a short article by Fr. Alexey Young.

    • jaxon64

      Actually it is you who may want to do some additional research.
      In Biblical referances to angels they are always referred to as “the SONS..of God”..mankind are referenced as the “children”..only Christ Himself in His human form was ever referred to as ” a son of God”-otherwise, it is the angels who are callled the sons…you may like a wonderfal Bible GreekEnglish translation volume–it is amazing how many times they use single english words in translation from the original texts and the Greek word may actually express a much broader idea or concept.
      A simple example would be the word “love” which is used throughout the Bible–but were actually 3 seperate words in Greek – each having a variance into type of love…( ex: philos–brotherly love; amor–passionate/heartfelt love; agape–Godly love)…
      It can also reinvigorate a passion for the knowledge of the scriptures..

      • jaxon64

        **wonderful…couldn’t let that ugly typo pass by

      • Theodore

        Jaxon64,
        Does the Bible refer to the FALLEN angels as the sons of God? I am not sure, but I have a feeling only the good angels are the sons of God.

        • Ryan Borger

          Might want to look into the book of enoch and figure out why it was excluded from the canon before you make too many replies. ;)

          • ian

            You dont have to look into extra biblical sources to find sons of God in reference to angels. Just read the book of Job. The phrase does not refer to human beings.

    • fffdde

      you are a total moron, to be honest, clearly angels can have physical human bodies..

  • Craig

    daughter of men were just men that did not worhship God , son of God were followers of God. Angels can not have sex with humans. It is a false teaching

    • Jack

      So they did not eat bread ? You’re the one who’s spreading false teachings

      • Craig

        1 John 3:1

        King James Version (KJV)

        3 Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not.

      • Butch1

        The Bible lifted many stories from earlier religions and put them together into what is now known as “The Holy Bible” containing the Old Testament, the Jewish portion and the New Testament containing that of the Messiah portion. If you read the “Epic of Gilgamesh” it was written 1000 years before the Jewish religion was even formed with a single god, you will find stories in it that have been “lifted” and are in the bible. You will find other miracles in the bible e.g. like the virgin birth, the flood the resurrection etc. that have happened in previous religions and were lifted and are now a part of the Christian religion. These religions were much older than the Jewish and Christian ones yet you see the same things happening in them. How can they claim to be the one’s to “own” these stories? They cannot. Who is spreading false teaching? Who stole the stories from the other older religions to make up their religion?

        Something to think about and I’m not telling you how to think, but the history is all there, I’m not lying and all you have to do is look it up.

        • Miroslav

          Hold on there dear fellow, it seems you do not understand who copied from who, so let me explain.

          You suppose that the Epic of Gilgamesh is more ‘original’ than Torah since it ‘precedes’ Torah by some years, you can believe this and i have no problems with that.

          What i do not like is that you make it look like Torah is a book full of stolen stories glued together and presented as a unique creation whilst actually borrowing stories from other sources like the mentioned Epic of Gilgamesh, now here is why:

          For the people who are not familiar with the two books, they share some points, e.g. the Flood and the wooden boat.

          Before you draw your conclusion based on what this fellow above me said do know that the dimensions of the boat in the ‘MORE true’ Epic of Gilgamesh are wrong and would have it not float, let alone survive pounding waves.

          The dimensions of the boat in the Torah are correct and would make it float

          If you do not believe this, look it up, it’s as much true as the existence of G-D.

          Now before we get the skeptics aroused and saying “The dimensions of the boat in Torah are not real” do consider the fact that there is only one way to find out and that is to BUILD the boat!

          So they could not simply just base it on mere assumption, no sir, they knew the proper dimension by building it :)

          • Butch1

            The Epic of Gilgamesh was written 1000 years before the Torah. Therefore, If there are any stories in the Torah that are similar, like or exact from the Epic, they were taken from it. How ever could it have been the other way around or even pretend that the Torah existed even near the same time frame? As I said, 1000 years before the Torah was ever written. Many stores in the Bible which talk about virgin birth, death, and resurrection come from other previous religions and have been lifted from them and put in this book. Old and New Testaments.

    • cybil

      and how can you prove this?

  • Lisa Vacula

    it all makes sense now…. thank you

  • Keet Hensley

    Thank You for finally someone coming out with this stuff, I personally have seen some of this coverup stuff. And Yes those Spiritual Glasses are quite real also. See in The New Testament when JESUS spoke, he referred to it with “Matthew 13:15
    For this people’s heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.”

    Whenever I pray for Someone or Something I pray, Lord Open their eyes so they may see, their ears so they may hear, and remove the hardness from their hearts so they may understand, In JESUS Name. I am referring to the eyes, ears and heart of the Spirit within.
    Many times the results have been so AMAZING.

    OK Atheists, jump me now, I am used to it, LOL.

  • Keet Hensley

    OH So much for the Accepted Church Doctrines that give other than truth explanations to keep their jobs.

    When JESUS left he promised to send us , his followers, a New Comforter.

    The Church’s will mostly deny this, but that New Comforter is the Holy Spirit and is within us.

    Proverbs 8:1 – 8:34 is the introduction and explanation of it’s purpose as well as it’s strength and power. The Spirit has a name, it is “TRUTH and WISDOM” and just to let you know, the name of the evil one is “LIES and ERROR” you can easily recognize who follow who when they speak.
    GOD BLESS YOU ALL.
    OK ATHEIST Your turn.

  • Dem274

    Hebrew God, is an Alien Acrhon.. God does not have emotions like a maniac. Read the Gnostics text.. It tells you about the true, alien rulers, and that the original source God is infinite and unknowable.

    • NowAlive

      If He’s unknowable, how do you know that?

  • Dem274

    Sons of God, where sons of the Archon alien god rulers. The god you pray too is an Alien. The true source is Unknowable and infinite. Read the Gnostic Mythos, for your own knowledge and compare it.

    • Mark Mitchell

      The Bible says what the sons of God are.They are Angels…it’s pointed out 3 times in the Old Test.Little more reseach will do you some good…also brush up on your Hebrew.

  • Layke

    Um, you guys realize that none of the bible is true, right?

    • Mark Mitchell

      So there is no place as Israel,Rome isn’t true,Jesus wasn’t real even though he is talked about countless times outside the Bible.i could go on genius.

      • Butch1

        Physically, yes. You are being very obtuse, Mark. Why does everything have to be black or white in your world?

  • Richard O. Mann

    There was another post some where yesterday stating that a DNA marker has been found in some groups of human, that are not “human”. Could be DNA is also about to show that the angles got involved with humans and had offspring. Got to see if I can find that report again.

  • Craig

    1 John 3:1

    King James Version (KJV)

    3 Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not.
    Now sons of God are just believers in God , not fallen angels. The giants are due to the fact when you mix to different peoples genes they became giants.

    • gott_cha

      If The so-called angels (messengers) cannot breed with humans, then how do we explain the “Holy Spirit” impregnating Mary?
      A “Spirit” does not have a body or “DNA”…or does it?
      Many questions and few answers fit if we rely on Mans Church (which has locked up the kingdom and hidden the keys) to interpret The CREATORS words

      Most of the Texts are allegorical or Parables for teaching truths when the “KEYS” are used…so said Yahusua the CHRIST. We need to remember they have 2 or more levels of meanings…..ie. fleshly,…..spiritually……and the combination of the both tied together

      • Joshua Thirteen

        really the one time miracle of God causing Mary to be pregnant as a virgin is not comparable. God can do anything, surely angels are not so powerful. In any case. The bible does NOT say angels bred with humans. As for the interpretation of the scripture by “man’s church’ humans are the only ones available to interpret the Bible. We can and should count on the Holy Sprit to guide us, but being what we are, sometimes we will be wrong. Taking the plain meaning of the text rather than a fanciful one seem to be the way to go in any case. Naturally you need to look at what kind of text you are dealing with. Is it an historical narrative? Poetry? Proverb? and so forth.

  • RayR

    “The rarefied air of heaven “. Sid Roth is a clown! Thus eliminating much of the credibility of this piece.

  • Brian Willis

    i definitely think they are nephilim freaks, and the pea brained idiots that worshipped them much like a wannabee white teen dresses up like he’s black and adopts the hip hop culture, these morons that cradle boarded their heads were just trying to be like these nephilim freaks. after all, they are half angel half human im sure their angel daddies taught them all kinds of stuff and so they seemed smarter, cooler than anyone else. so of course your going to get dummies who want to make their heads cone shaped like the “cool” crowd. It was the in thing to do back then.

    Just like the in thing to do right now is to put on skinny jeens grow a shaggy beard and wear a beret and flannel shirt and be a hipster trendy. Go back a few thousand years and the in thing to do would be to look like the nephilim.

  • Cynthia Marks

    http://gracethrufaith.com/end-times-prophecy/the-nephilim/#more-204
    The above link brings up very good points scripture wise regarding Nephilim.

  • Lei

    I just remembered the movie Indiana Jones and the Crystal skull..The skull’s shape resembles to that..Seeing this truly amazes me. Little did I know such creatures existed. Science is really fun!!!

  • propel7

    A true ABOMINATION.

  • Little Diamond

    :-) Thank you DivineAdvanced Humanbeings <3

  • gott_cha

    We are made in HIS image…..if that be then we are more than “Flesh” we are also etheral and spitirtual.
    We think spirit means ghost….not so….it is a type of flesh not limited to earth bound time. The Scriptures tell of earthly flesh bodies and heavenly type flesh bodies…not all flesh is as we are….not all are trapped in the earthly limits of time and mortality……we when die….only this Shell/tent/earth body ceases to exsist

  • Truthis Thenewhate

    uh oh, a post war jewish invented judeo-christian L.A. Marzulli is at it again.