Michael T. Snyder's Shocking New Novel About The Future Of America
Beginning Of The End - Kindle Version by Michael T. Snyder
Survive After Collapse

Recent Posts

Archives

Emergency Essentials/BePrepared
Sold Out After A Crisis

Subscribe By Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Agenda 21: The BLM Land Grabbing Endgame

Agenda 21 Map 450x327 Agenda 21: The BLM Land Grabbing Endgame

Why is the federal government so obsessed with grabbing more land?  After all, the federal government already owns more than 40 percent of the land in 9 different U.S. states.  Why are federal bureaucrats so determined to grab even more?  Well, the truth is that this all becomes much clearer once you understand that there is a very twisted philosophy behind what they are doing.  It is commonly known as “Agenda 21″, although many names and labels are used for this particular philosophy.  Basically, those that hold to this form of radical environmentalism believe that humanity is utterly destroying the planet, and therefore the goal should be to create a world where literally everything that we do is tightly monitored and controlled by control freak bureaucrats in the name of “sustainable development”.  In their vision of the future, the human population will be greatly reduced and human activity will be limited to strictly regulated urban areas and travel corridors.  The rest of the planet will be left to nature.  To achieve this goal, a massive transfer of land from private landowners to the federal government will be necessary.

So the conflict between Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and the BLM is really just the tip of the iceberg.  The reality is that the BLM has their eyes on much bigger prizes.

For example, Breitbart is reporting that the BLM is looking at grabbing 90,000 privately-held acres along the Texas/Oklahoma border…

After the recent Bundy Ranch episode by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Texans are becoming more concerned about the BLM’s focus on 90,000 acres along a 116 mile stretch of the Texas/Oklahoma boundary. The BLM is reviewing the possible federal takeover and ownership of privately-held lands which have been deeded property for generations of Texas landowners.

Sid Miller, former Texas State Representative and Republican candidate for Texas Agriculture Commissioner, has since made the matter a campaign issue to Breitbart Texas.

“In Texas,” Miller says, “the BLM is attempting a repeat of an action taken over 30 years ago along the Red River when Tommy Henderson lost a federal lawsuit. The Bureau of Land Management took 140 acres of his property and didn’t pay him one cent.”

Needless to say, officials down in Texas are not pleased about this.  In fact, just check out what the attorney general of Texas is saying

Gen. Abbott sent a strongly-worded letter to BLM Director Neil Kornze, asking for answers to a series of questions related to the potential land grab.

“I am deeply concerned about the notion that the Bureau of Land Management believes the federal government has the authority to swoop in and take land that has been owned and cultivated by Texas landowners for generations,” General Abbott wrote. “The BLM’s newly asserted claims to land along the Red River threaten to upset long-settled private property rights and undermine fundamental principles—including the rule of law—that form the foundation of our democracy. Yet, the BLM has failed to disclose either its full intentions or the legal justification for its proposed actions. Decisions of this magnitude must not be made inside a bureaucratic black box.”

In an exclusive interview with Breitbart Texas, General Abbott said, “This is the latest line of attack by the Obama Administration where it seems like they have a complete disregard for the rule of law in this country …And now they’ve crossed the line quite literally by coming into the State of Texas and trying to claim Texas land as federal land. And, as the Attorney General of Texas I am not going to allow this.”

Does the federal government actually need more land?

As I mentioned above, the feds already own more than 40 percent of the land in 9 different U.S. states

Nevada: 84.5 percent
Alaska: 69.1 percent
Utah: 57.4 percent
Oregon: 53.1 percent
Idaho: 50.2 percent
Arizona: 48.1 percent
California: 45.3 percent
Wyoming: 42.4 percent
New Mexico: 41.8 percent

The federal government does not need more land.  But there is an obsession to grab more so that the dictates of Agenda 21 can be implemented.

The map that I have posted below is a simulation of what the endgame of Agenda 21 might look like.  If these radical environmentalists get their way, the only areas that will be allocated for normal human use will be the areas in green…

Agenda 21 Map 450x327 Agenda 21: The BLM Land Grabbing Endgame

If you do not go along with the “sustainable development” agenda, you risk being labeled a “threat” to be dealt with.

For example, Senator Harry Reid has used the label “domestic terrorists” to describe those that showed up to support Cliven Bundy at his ranch.

Reid could have used lots of other labels.  But he specifically chose to call them terrorists.  And considering what the law allows the feds to do to “terrorists”, that is quite chilling.

And don’t think that if you just stay quiet that you won’t get labeled as a “terrorist”.  In fact, there is a very good chance that you already fit several government criteria for being a terrorist.  Just check out the list below.  It comes from my previous article entitled “72 Types Of Americans That Are Considered ‘Potential Terrorists’ In Official Government Documents“…

1. Those that talk about “individual liberties”

2. Those that advocate for states’ rights

3. Those that want “to make the world a better place”

4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”

5. Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”

6. Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”

7. Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable”

8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”

9. Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”

10. “Anti-Gay”

11. “Anti-Immigrant”

12. “Anti-Muslim”

13. “The Patriot Movement”

14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”

15. Members of the Family Research Council

16. Members of the American Family Association

17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union’”

18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol

19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform

20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition

21. Members of the Christian Action Network

22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”

23. Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”

24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21

25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps

26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”

27. The militia movement

28. The sovereign citizen movement

29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”

30. Anyone that “complains about bias”

31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”

32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”

33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs”

34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”

35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”

36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”

37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”

38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”

39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”

40. “Militia or unorganized militia”

41. “General right-wing extremist”

42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.

43. Those that refer to an “Army of God”

44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”

45. Those that are “anti-global”

46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”

47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”

48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”

49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”

50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”

51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”

52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”

53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”

54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”

55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”

56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”

57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”

58. “Rightwing extremists”

59. “Returning veterans”

60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”

61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”

62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”

63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”

64. “Anti-abortion activists”

65. Those that are against illegal immigration

66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner

67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations

68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”

69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr

70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)

71. Those that believe in “end times” prophecies

72. Evangelical Christians

Do any of those criteria apply to you?

If so, then you are a “potential terrorist” according to the U.S. government.

We live at a time when the federal government is becoming increasingly oppressive.  Just consider the following excerpt from a recent article by John W. Whitehead

It’s not just the Cliven Bundys of the world who are being dealt with in this manner. Don Miller, a 91-year-old antiques collector, recently had his Indiana home raided by the FBI, ostensibly because it might be in the nation’s best interest if the rare and valuable antiques and artifacts Miller had collected over the course of 80 years were cared for by the government. Such tactics carried out by anyone other than the government would be considered grand larceny, and yet the government gets a free pass.

In the same way, the government insists it can carry out all manner of surveillance on us—listen in on our phone calls, read our emails and text messages, track our movements, photograph our license plates, even enter our biometric information into DNA databases—but those who dare to return the favor, even a little, by filming potential police misconduct, get roughed up by the police, arrested, charged with violating various and sundry crimes.

This was not what our founders intended.

Our liberties and freedoms are being eroded a little bit more with each passing day, and most Americans don’t even seem to care.

In the end, we will pay a great price for our apathy.

About the author: Michael T. Snyder is a former Washington D.C. attorney who now publishes The Truth. His new thriller entitled “The Beginning Of The End” is now available on Amazon.com.

3dnew3 240x300 Agenda 21: The BLM Land Grabbing Endgame
Be Sociable, Share!
  • more Agenda 21: The BLM Land Grabbing Endgame

Instantly Add To The Conversation Using Facebook Comments

comments

  • Joshua Roberts

    White Al-Qaeda meme progression has been swift and in-your-face, since 9/11 they have rapidly accelerated the agenda and are now in full view; however, if we humble ourselves and ask God to heal this land, we will gain the strength to defeat the NWO. Indeed, if we do not end this thing here, the world as we know it and have know it is over – already we tip toe on the doorstep of a Luciferian post-human borg beehive and technopanopticon.

    Agenda 21 is the logical endpoint of a forced-scarcity paradigm run by elites for thousands of years and essentially, as you all know, neofeudalism. We grapple with a global kleptocratic plutocracy (rule by elite thieves) today, vastly more sophisticated than anything our ancestors had known, but they have armed us with insights and with the truth if we pay heed and even now, brave men and women continue to sound the clarion call to justice.

    We have our work cut out for us extracting our fellow human beings from the matrix of control – but look into the mirror my friends and ask yourself: “was i not born PRECISELY for This Task?”

    (selah)

  • K

    Please do not call Agenda 21 radical environmentalism, that is just the cover. It is all about control. It needed some cuddly excuse, to do what the people would never stand for. You saw it at the Bundy ranch. All of that was about a desert tortoise? The same species they had killed 150 of a few months before. No just an excuse for more insider greed, and Government control. Some very evil people, think their fellow humans are only good for one thing, slaves. And soon once technology advances, just a little more. These same evil and greedy people, will decide their fellow humans are good for nothing. Read the list above, how many of you are not on it? While the Lord is the only permanent answer. I do not think it means, we should not resist evil. They have put a name to the list above, domestic terrorist. Do you find that acceptable?

    • Johnny Shiloh

      Right on, bro, right on! Could not agree more! It is shocking beyond belief what all Obama has gotten away with. He seems continually on the side of those who seek to oppress and dismantle our civil liberties. He seems to have no understanding of the concept of individual liberty and the bedrock principles of our grand old Constitution. And to think that those who do cherish our heritage are considered terrorists! It speaks VOLUMES about where we are right now.

      • K

        Understand I am also totally against violence. But I do reserve the right of self defense.

        • Ian MacLeod

          If your idea of “self-defense” doesn’t include defending your neighbors and Americans in general then it’s too narrow. Too much so to make any difference in the outcome, anyway.

          • K

            It would include neighbors, after that case by case basis.

      • true88

        It’s not obama that’s making these decisions people, he’s following a script. The queen Elizabeth and london run this country.. research!!!

  • Syrin

    Let’s be clear. Gov’t, at some level, owns ALL land. I have paid off my mortgage, and the deed to my land and home is mine, but I still pay rent to my landlord every month in the form of property taxes. Guess what happens to “my” home and “my” land if I don’t pay them? All of a sudden “my” land and “my” home is no longer mine, but that of dear leaders. The Mafia wishes it should shake people down as efficiently as the gov’t does.

    • Sandbagger

      Real Estate=Royal Estate
      The word “real” means royal.

      • xander cross

        A lot of people don’t know that.

    • seth datta

      The government is actually satanic bankers and support staff.

      The government/bankers ACTUALLY OWN PEOPLE.

      This is not an April Fool’s – they can actually mind control most of the population. Of course, no one will believe it until one day they actually admit that they can read your thoughts. The environment has been weaponised through nanotechnology released by chemtrails. They just do not admit to the real level of technological advancement. This is true in all Western nations and Russia; not so much the Middle East/India/etc YET.

      They can implant thoughts into the subconscious using SSSS technology (DARPA patented) and a variety of other technologies, using satellites etc.
      Then the word ‘schizophrenia’ is used to hide the use of this technology. The Russians had ‘sluggish schizophrenia’ for enemies of the state. Schizophrenics are actually more sensitive than others to the use of this technology. It is used globally (easily done via satellite use) and is the ‘Mark of the Beast’ in the forehead; if people do not know if this tech is used, how can they be aware that they are being implanted with foreign thoughts? Hence, why we have the violence and other problems we have in the world today.

      • Hammerstrike

        Problem, many tourists to India and the Middle-East…

        Mainstream medias and Common Core also, they would be made obsolet.

  • DJohn1

    There is a secondary battle going on. If a man is accused of a crime, he has a right to defend himself in a court of law. He is innocent until proven guilty.
    Congressman Harry Reid may never get elected again. Public opinion will bring him down just as well as a court of law would. Is he guilty? If I were in this position, I would want an investigation to clear my good name. I think he plans to retire before the 2016 election.
    Cliven Bundy obviously feels that a Federal Court will rule against him under all circumstances. That the BLM has a stacked deck of cards in a court of law. He may be right.
    That there is something smelling very fishy about the entire BLM case for taking over the land goes without much saying.
    What is horrifying to a lot of people is that the courts are backing the BLM in this case.
    When you do not have even the “appearance” of justice in our courts, then it is only a matter of time before we have a situation where no one will believe they are just. It is important to maintain the morale high ground in a court of law. If not the court of public opinion will eventually win the day.

    • Ian MacLeod

      “When you do not have even the “appearance” of justice in our courts,
      then it is only a matter of time before we have a situation where no one
      will believe they are just.”

      No one who is paying ANY attention thinks that D.C. and its CEO are in the LEAST BIT “just”! This is Agenda 21 and the “elite” takeover in the beginning stages. There’s nothing else it COULD BE. If Americans were to ACT – NOW – there might be a chance. Maybe. It depends on how much of the truly NEW tech they’re willing to unleash on the populace. I don’t see anything that could stop them, though.

  • Seen2013

    It’s not environmentalism; it uses environmentalism to promote Neo-Malthusian solutions to problems governmental subsidized fiefdoms, partners, and unofficial and developing mergers with private interests desire. It’s about power and control in a society largely stripped of rights with privileges and guilty until proven innocent under the philosophies of ends justify the means and might makes right.

    When solutions offered to abate issues caused by the transitions effectively solidifying the desired results, people should be more weary than many seem to have been.

  • Veteran For Peace

    Wow, I’m a terrorist.
    Woohoo!
    I’m a terrorist!
    I’m a terrorist!

    Death to de Amer-dica!

    Death!
    Death!
    Death!

  • K2

    While govt grabbing already owned land from citizens, organisations is absolutely wrong, is there any evidence to say this is all part of agenda 21?

    • K2

      Reid calling them domestic terrorists is also absolutely wrong.

      • FirstGarden

        Leave it to a Fascist to call American citizens terrorists.

  • K2

    And please dont bash ‘environmental concern’ just because the govt is grabbing land using it as an excuse/reason.

    Land grabs were done for oil, its doesnt make oil usage wrong. It is the people who did that were wrong, not oil nor oil users.

    Land grabs were done for religion, it doesnt make believing/following religion wrong. It is the people who did that in the name of religion that were wrong, not religion
    .

    • FirstGarden

      Good point.

  • RoscoeBonifitucci

    Good article. Glenn Beck wrote an interesting novel called Agenda 21 about 2 years ago. It is an interesting read and though it is a “fiction”, it is based in Truth. You know, that thing the Leftist Main Stream Media does not convey these days. :)

    I guess me, my posse, church, fellow workers, community, state and most of America would be considered Terrorists by the Barack the Magic Marxist and his Comrades.

  • Hammerstrike

    8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”

    50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”

    51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”

    52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”

    53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”

    Except the followers of Islam…

  • DJohn1

    Be sure to thank the 300 people that voted for our extended security rules that are really unconstitutional. They were mostly lawyers and they knew better.
    All of this is not affordable. If you look real close at that list it just about includes everyone with a brain.
    Panic law is never good. That panic law needs to be reversed and it probably will not happen.
    The EPA is a good example of Panic Law in the Congress.
    Who watches the EPA? Who watches the Land Management group?
    When does the justice system take on the contrary regulations legislated by a paniced congress?
    If any company out there tried half of what the government is doing they would go bankrupt in a year. Resources simply do not support this kind of tech on a large scale.
    Logisitics and accounting even in government have to be considered before government do things. And that is the trouble with government, they do not consider the logistics and accounting before they do things like go to war.

  • xander cross

    It’s not his land people. He does not own it. It’s federal property.

  • DJohn1

    Using flimsy excuses to grab land?
    Last I checked that is not very legal.
    Using Land Management and EPA to do so is crazy unless you have no intention of ever getting elected again. Unless there is no oversight to these agencies in the Congress, then it makes perfect sense for the individuals involved in theft. But what about the other members of Congress all up for election this year? What paints one man of a political party paints all.

    The trouble is our legal beagals are casting a blind eye to all of this.
    Makes one wonder what else they are blind about. Federal judges with a blind eye to fraud in government?

    Especially since most of it has come out to public attention.
    Any Congress Person worth their wages should be calling for a complete investigation and an independent prosecutor.

    The first one calling that investigation should be the people accused of corruption and wrong doing. UNLESS they are guilty as charged. Then it makes perfect sense.
    This is not about an individual canterous old rancher that refuses to pay taxes. It is about theft of cattle, theft of land under false pretenses, driving food producing ranchers out of business and raising the price of beef to untold levels. It is about theft of jurisdiction in a case that belongs in the sheriff’s hands.
    It is about stealing land from state’s jurisdictions by a run away Federal agency intent on going in with deadly force.
    It backfired publicly. The underlying theft was exposed for all to see on the internet. And all this in an election year? That does not make any kind of sense at all to me.

  • Copper Munger

    I have known all about Agenda 21 since 2009. Also the Club of Rome, Club of Madrid, and Club of Budapest, the cabal of the NWO. The Catholic Church’s astronomers and the Pope are watching and waiting for the ‘alien’ savior. And they are hard at work getting mainline denominations to follow the Lutheran Church in signing a ‘peace treaty’ acknowledging that “Luther’s protest” is over. They have conveniently forgotten the other 94 un-Biblical practices. As if the murder, burning and dismemberment of infants in the womb was not bad enough, we’ve learned that like the UK, murdered babies are being burned for fuel on the west coast.

    I have fasted and prayed for this nation. When the Republican Party colluded in giving the 2012 election to the Islamo Communist, I knew in my heart the nation was being judged. Since then I have read “Eye to Eye”, William Koenig and “The Israel Omen”, “Israel Omen II”, David Brennan. Every time our leaders pressure Israel to give up ‘land for peace’, the nation suffers a historically significant catastrophe. Israel is the apple of the eye of the LORD and we keep poking HIM in the eye.

    Recently I felt prompted to read Jeremiah 19, the next day I read the article on this site that delineated the 100 evidences of the moral failure of the US. Those that related to abortion jumped off the page. If Manasseh was the worst king in GOD’s eyes for passing his son through the fire, and Judah was exiled to Babylon for this very practice, how can we hope as a nation to escape HIS wrath?

    I don’t need Daniel to interpret the handwriting on the wall.

  • Nr73

    Nr73 should be God, since He’s the one who will ultimately bring down their criminal government, and send the whole pack to Hell to be eternally terrorized by their master Satan.