Are You Absolutely Certain That You Know The Truth About What Happened On 9/11?

Share on Facebook426Tweet about this on TwitterPin on Pinterest3Share on Google+3Share on StumbleUpon35Print this pageEmail this to someone

9-11 Flight 175 Hits The World Trade Center

Do you believe that you know precisely what happened on 9/11/2001?  Are you absolutely certain that you know the truth?  If so, what you are about to see might shake you up quite a bit.  The events that happened 12 years ago on this day shocked the world and will certainly never be forgotten.  Thousands of innocent people died needlessly, and that day fundamentally changed the course of history.  But what if it could be proven that the “official story” that the government has been telling us about 9/11 is a lie?  Are you willing to use logic and reason to evaluate new evidence that has emerged, or do you have such an emotional attachment to your current beliefs that you are going to blindly believe whatever the government tells you to believe?  In this day and age, it is absolutely imperative that we all learn to think for ourselves.  For the next few minutes, please be very skeptical as you read the rest of this article.  Be skeptical of what I am claiming, be skeptical of what the experts are claiming and be skeptical of what the government is claiming.  Evaluate the evidence for yourself and come to your own conclusions.

More than 2,000 architects and engineers are supporting a massive worldwide advertising campaign entitled ReThink911.  You can find the official website right here.  According to these architects and engineers, the government’s version of what happened on 9/11/2001 is absolutely impossible.

And it turns out that an increasing percentage of the American population is agreeing with them.  The following is an excerpt from a ReThink911 press release about new polling that has just been released…


On the 12th anniversary of 9/11, a new national survey by the polling firm YouGov reveals that one in two Americans have doubts about the government’s account of 9/11, and after viewing video footage of World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse, 46% suspect that it was caused by a controlled demolition. Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper, collapsed into its own footprint late in the afternoon on 9/11.

The poll was sponsored by ReThink911, a global public awareness campaign launched on September 1. The campaign includes a 54-foot billboard in Times Square and a variety of transit and outdoor advertising in 11 other cities, all posing the question, “Did you know a third tower fell on 9/11?

Among the poll’s findings:

  • 38% of Americans have some doubts about the official account of 9/11, 10% do not believe it at all, and 12% are unsure about it;
  • 46%, nearly one in two, are not aware that a third tower collapsed on 9/11. Of those who are aware of Building 7’s collapse, only 19% know the building’s name;
  • After seeing video footage of Building 7′s collapse:
    • 46% are sure or suspect it was caused by controlled demolition, compared to 28% who are sure or suspect fires caused it, and 27% who don’t know;
    • By a margin of nearly two to one, 41% support a new investigation of Building 7′s collapse, compared to 21% who oppose it.


Even though Americans have been hearing about 9/11 endlessly for the past 12 years, nearly half of them still don’t know that a third building fell on that day.  A 47-story building named “Building 7” collapsed perfectly into its own footprint at freefall speed, but no plane ever hit it.

So why did it fall?

The following is the official ReThink911 video about Building 7…

And of course the collapse of the other two World Trade Center towers would have been impossible as well without the help of controlled demolition.

But for many Americans, the implications of accepting that reality would just be too painful to accept.  It would mean that someone wired those buildings for controlled demolition ahead of time, and for many very patriotic Americans such a notion is absolutely unthinkable.

However, we owe it to future generations of Americans to put our emotions aside and to search out the truth.  Whoever was responsible for the events of 9/11 needs to be brought to justice, no matter who they might be.

And the families of those that were killed on that day deserve to know exactly what happened and why it happened.  The following is an excerpt from a great editorial by Dennis Maley in the Bradenton Times

For too long, government officials have been able to successfully leverage the emotional components of the tragedy to deflect questions they painted as either disrespectful to the victims and their families or crackpot conspiracies. But with over 2,000 architects and engineers having signed the 9/11 truth petition, most of whom have offered credible and detailed reasons why their expertise has left them at odds with root elements of the official version of events, there remain too many unanswered questions for us to continue to ignore those raising them.

Perhaps the most noted event of that day, in terms of skepticism, is the implausible “collapse” of building seven, the third tower to fall, which reached free-fall speeds and fell in its own footprint in the way that a controlled demolition does – despite the fact that it was not hit by a plane. Building seven’s improbable collapse was not explained by the 9/11 Commission and has been routinely described by demolition experts as something which could have only occurred through a well-planned, coordinated demolition, aided by pre-placed explosives.

The two main towers also fell at near free-fall speeds, with concrete floors being pulverized to dust almost immediately (before the required force would be present) while the necessary deceleration that would be needed to generate the force to continuously penetrate each floor below was obviously absent. Quite simply, a building of that size and structural integrity would not seem capable of falling at such speed, while simultaneously expelling such tremendous energy in obliterating each floor  which was nearly 4-ft. thick and topped with 4 inches of poured concrete above and lined with interlocking steel trusses beneath.

The documented phenomenon of extreme-high temperatures at the twin tower sites, which inexplicably reached levels capable of melting iron and structural steel when a normal open air fire is not capable of reaching such ranges, also warrants a closer look, as does eyewitness accounts of “molten metal.” Iron-laden spheres in residual dust at the site that suggest temperatures had to reach more than 2,700 degrees fahrenheit (the melting point of iron and structural steel) is also suspect. The use of thermite would be one possible explanation, though the pyrotechnic compound was not tested for at the site, a standard protocol when investigating such an explosion.

Why are so many Americans still so resistant to asking such hard questions?

Shouldn’t we allow the evidence to lead us to the truth instead of allowing the government to define what the truth is for us?

Posted below is video from investigative reporter Ben Swann asking some more questions about the collapse of Building 7…

Why aren’t there more reporters out there like Ben Swann?

Today, we live in a society where certain kinds of questions are considered to be “off limits”.  But that should not be the case.  As Americans, we should all be “truth seekers”.

After all, the truth will set us free, right?

I want to share another video with you, but this one doesn’t have anything to do with Building 7.  Instead, it shows well-known footage of Flight 175 hitting one of the World Trade Center towers.  The incredible thing about this video is that it apparently shows a very obvious “CGI glitch” that I have absolutely no explanation for.  Watch this video for yourself and see what you think…

Can you explain that very blatant CGI glitch?

I can’t.

Perhaps there is a rational explanation.  If so, I would love to hear it.

But wait a minute, wasn’t al-Qaeda supposed to be behind 9/11?  Wasn’t that the reason why we have been chasing them around the Middle East for over a decade?

Well, these days the U.S. government is actually allied with al-Qaeda.  The Obama administration has been supplying Syrian rebel groups that are openly affiliated with al-Qaeda with weapons and supplies even though they are slaughtering Christians, using chemical weapons and dismembering little girls.

And now Obama is telling us that we need the U.S. military to get directly involved in the civil war in Syria so that we can help al-Qaeda take over Syria and set up a radical jihadist Sunni government in that nation.  The following is an excerpt from a recent article by Paul Joseph Watson

The Obama administration’s insistence that the United States intervene militarily on the side of Syrian rebels, who are being led by Al-Qaeda affiliate Jabhat al-Nusra, which the report states is the “most effective fighting force in Syria,” has led to charges by the likes of Senator Ted Cruz that the White House is acting as “Al-Qaeda’s Air Force.”

The BPC report also warns that chemical weapons falling into the hands of jihadists in Syria could subsequently be used against the west.

“Potential jihadi access to the vast stockpile of chemical weapons assembled by the Assad regime and scattered across Syria is a potential game-changer though—not only because they could be used there, but because they could be smuggled out of the country as well,” states the report.

The report highlights how Jabhat al-Nusra is under the control of Al-Qaeda leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri, who “personally intervened to settle a dispute between Jabhat al-Nusra and al-Qaeda in Iraq….and declared the Syrian group to be under his direction.”

If you doubt any of this, just watch the video posted below.  It shows Syrian rebels singing a victory song about the destruction of the World Trade Center towers, praising Osama bin Laden, and calling him their leader…

Does that video make you angry?

It should.

12 years after 9/11, the U.S. government is allied with the very forces that supposedly conducted the terror attacks in the first place.

Something does not add up here.

For much more on all of this, and especially if you are new to this information about 9/11, I encourage you to watch the award-winning documentary Loose Change which is posted below…

About the author: Michael T. Snyder is a former Washington D.C. attorney who now publishes The Truth.  His new thriller entitled “The Beginning Of The End” is now available on

Michael T. Snyder's Shocking New Novel About The Future Of America

The Beginning Of The End - The New Novel About The Future Of America By Michael T. Snyder
Share on Facebook426Tweet about this on TwitterPin on Pinterest3Share on Google+3Share on StumbleUpon35Print this pageEmail this to someone
  • MichaelfromTheEconomicCollapse

    What do all of you think happened to Building 7?


    • Graham

      WTC buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 became no more on that infamous day of “outrageous” physics and “seven” ludicrous contradictions.

      It’s just a matter of time… and when it comes, many will experience the rudest awakening ever.

    • Kim

      I’m sorry, I had left my comment to this question in the wrong thread. Ah, the beauty of multi-tasking.

      Anyway, there is a plausible explanation for its free fall collapse: its unusual design, the fact that the preliminary FEMA reports were incorrect; bldg 7 was severely compromised after the initial explosions and destruction of 1 & 2, it was never attended to by firefighters and it is possible for steel to fail at temperatures achieved by a fire such as the one that occurred in it.

      • Kim

        Furthermore, we already know that dynamite can demolish a building- and it would be naive to assume that is the ONLY thing that can bring a building down. Earthquakes, fires, wrecking balls, et cet.

      • There are numerous documentaries that clearly, and I mean clearly, prove that the buildings DID NOT collapsed b/c of any planes hitting them nor b/c of the fire. Do yourself a favor and please watch them. You can Google them. If you don’t feel like watching the documentaries (which I don’t see why you wouldn’t since, with all due respect ma’am, you’re completely naive about the truth), then please research the term: “Pull ” as it relates to demolitions and then watch the Larry Silverstein interview on YouTube

    • ort

      I do not trust our evil government, and the CFR, George Soros, and The Bilderbergers have their filthy hands in this pie. Only a blithering fool believes what our government tells them.

  • Tim

    It’s good to see an article from you on this subject. I’ve come to the conclusion that there were a lot of players involved in the events of 9/11/01. It’s very complicated, and I’ll never be able to put the whole puzzle together. But I think it’s indisputable that the North and South Towers and Building 7 were brought down with explosives.

    In February 1991, a fire broke out on the 22nd floor of Meridian Plaza, a high-rise office building in Philadelphia. The fire burned intensely for 19 hours and eventually reached the 30th floor. But the building never collapsed! After the fire, city officials determined that the building was not in danger of collapse. So how could the South Tower of the WTC collapse after burning for only 1 hour? How could the North Tower collapse after burning for only 2 hours? After 9/11, Fire Engineering magazine stated “No steel building has ever been destroyed by fire.”

  • Elie Chouinard

    We will not have liberty nor will the world be safe until 9/11 is re-investigated with full subpoena powers.
    All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

    • Graham


      Quick question. Who are the good men you speak of that are doing nothing, hence no proper solutions?

      Even the 9/11 Commission authors ripped their report apart after a few years. Lol!

      • Elie Chouinard

        Quick answer.
        All the good folks in our Executive, Judicial,
        and Legislative branches of government and continuing down the food chain with
        high ranking military leaders, church leaders, fire and law enforcement
        leaders, leaders in the scientific and education community… all the way down to
        your neighbor who doesn’t want to talk about it or thinks you are a conspiracy nut.

  • Elie Chouinard

    Anyone who believes the official version of 9/11 is a fool and anyone who supports the official version is a traitor.

    • Louise in MO

      What an overreaching bizaar assumption!

      • Graham

        There is absolutely no assumption whatsoever in the statement.

        Elie is obviously aware of the full timeline of connecting data, which began long before 9/11 happened and extended long after it.

        Too many get blinded by the immensity of the day itself.

      • Elie Chouinard

        What is overreaching and bazaar to me is not only the government’s version of what happened on 9/11 but also what we have allowed our leaders to create ever since.

        9/11 was the worst disasters to happen on American soil during my lifetime. On that
        day about 3,000 of us died, including 343 firefighters, 23 NYPD, and 37 Port
        Authority Officers.
        Since 9/11 we have the Patriot Act, bank bailouts, TSA, National Defense
        Authorization Act, the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, torturing of suspected
        terrorists, predator drones killing innocent civilians, saber rattling about Iran and Syria, the housing bubble, and companies like MF Global operating with impunity.
        We also see the top 10% being enriched while many of us are losing our houses, jobs and seeing major cities going bankrupt. Our education system, health and infrastructure are also on the decline.
        Why do I think the official 9/11 version needs a reinvestigation?
        1. It does not make sense to me that a 47-story modern building can collapse at
        free fall speed, (If you dropped a bowling from the roof of building 7 right when it
        started to collapse they both would of hit the ground within seconds of each other), after burning a few hours from an ordinary fire.
        2. Another event that bothers me is one that is accepted and not questioned by those who believe the official version is terrorists under Osama Ben Laden flew a passenger jet into the Pentagon.
        The Pentagon is touted to be one of the most secure buildings in the world yet there is not one video showing a plane slamming into it. Why? Can you explain how the softest part of an airplane, the nose section, could leave a round hole in a fortified building and not show any damage from the two six-ton engines, wings and tail sections?
        3. The plane crash at Shanksville PA is also questionable, normally all the wreckage is found at the crash site at Shanksville debris was located eight miles away.
        A re-investigation of 9/11 with full subpoena powers could possibly prove that the government’s version was bogus and a false flag. If the official version were debunked war crime tribunals would be the next logical step to bring our country back to the ideals of our founding fathers.

  • 2Gary2

    Islam is the religion of Satan.

    • Graham

      Is that so.

      • Kim


      • Louise in MO

        Yes, that is so!

        • Graham

          Hi Louise

          Can you provide any “substantiated” evidence proving this and I will happily go and research it?

    • seth datta

      Islam is not God’s religion, but is it the religion of Satan? I would put forward the notion that Luciferianism is an actual religion and is of Satan, whereas Islam is unGodly, but is separate from Luciferianism/which=Satanism.

    • Sylvia

      Hi Gary. I understand how Osama Bin Laden, Jihad, and the correlation “Islam=Terrorism” will of course make you feel that Islam is indeed the religion of Satan. However, I can assure you that there are millions of good, decent Muslims out there in the world, and many do not believe in the violence propagated by radical groups like Al Qaeda. This may come as a shock to you, but classical Islam does NOT promote violence. True Islam is far from what you see on TV or what is promoted in mainstream media. Sadly, men with radical ideas about how they believe Islam should be practiced – such as Bin Laden – have given the religion a very bad name indeed.

    • TXPatriot

      Where did you learn to hate muslims?

    • Patrick Bishop

      I think youre wrong ! all cults are not just islam!!~

  • Graham

    The video footage of an estimated 880,000 bikers in DC for 9/11 was absolutely remarkable. Glad to see such a dedicated group having the integrity to organise such an event and carry it through.

    What’s everybody else doing?

  • Theodore

    “Flight 175 (rare video)” is clearly a fake… but do you really think the second tower was not hit by a plane? There were thousands of people that saw it being hit by a plane…
    Nobody can be 100% sure about 9/11, but do you imagine how many people would have had to be involved, and how difficult would it be to keep such a secret?

    • MichaelfromTheEconomicCollapse

      I am not saying that I don’t think it was hit by a plane. I jus’t don’t know how to explain that video. Could it be possible that someone “recreated” footage of the moment of impact to touch us all on a deeper emotional level?

      I don’t know.


      • Kim

        Building seven was severely compromised after the initial hit. Its unusual design could have caused it to collapse “free fall”, as it were.

        See popular mechanic’s explanation of building seven’s collapse. Make sense to me.

        • Tim

          Building 7 was never hit by an airplane. No steel building has ever been destroyed by fire. So what caused it to collapse? It was brought down with explosives. And I’m certainly not alone in my view.

          • Kim

            Yes I know! I meant the initial hit of the north and south towers. I didn’t think i needed to be specific…And steel can bend, sag, break and fail at temperatures achieved by a fire such as this. No one is suggesting that any steel was destroyed by the heat. Only that it failed to hold up the bldg.

          • BenforTruth

            if the metal could bend, then that means the towers would have toppled to the side. but they fell on top of each other at free fall speed. THE ONLY F’ING way a building can collapse at freefall speed is if EVERY SINGLE FLOOR is simultaneously pulverized by a bomb or sum device. A plane CANNOT hold enough fluid to take down like a 100,000 story building. Oh and btw the World Trade Centers were the most reinforced structure ever created!!!!!! did popular mechanics tell you that???????

          • Kim

            It depends. How damaged was it? I get that there are anomalies in the collapse of bldg 7. Michael has effectively explained the what and partially the why, but how would this conspiracy to destroy the WTCs be carried out? It’s logistically a long shot, IMO. And the benefit is money? That’s it? Money?

          • Graham

            The true benefit was a fully supported launch platform for a phoney war on terror, but underpinning that was an essential part of a global agenda.

            They call it full spectrum dominance. The resulting religious conflicts are all a part of the same agenda and many have been perfectly positioned for the final stage.

            When you make something seem incredulous enough, your average mind will never believe the truth.

            What humans refer to as “normal”, is actually a twisted mind warp of disarray and total confusion.

            Unplug from the matrix and the truth becomes easier to find, see and accept.

          • Graham

            The towers fell on top of each other?

            100,000 stories building?

            If that’s your idea of disseminating truth Ben, then I’m a complete idiot. The rest of the post was looking good as well.

            Can you explain why WTC 6 had perfectly shaped circular type gouges out of the top of it and where it’s interior went?

          • Graham

            Firefighters are on record speaking about “molten rivers of steel” flowing in the pile. Thermal images taken by satellite confirm it. It went on for weeks.

            The temperatures involved were fairly low, as per survivor testimony. Most of the fire you saw was the burning of aircraft fuel externally.

            The WTC steel was certified to well over 2,400 degrees (?). Kerosine burns at a maximum of 1,400. Did office furniture fire pulverise over 1 million tonnes of steel per building? No.

            Basically I am stating, not suggesting, that something melted through steel, as is confirmed by some media footage. Can you explain the many vehicles that had melted engine blocks and missing door handles, yet the paint looked fine? Some were parked a few blocks away.

            The core’s were rigged with military grade thermite during the elevator refurb program that began in March 2001. Unmarked white vans arrived late and night and left the car parks at 5am. CCTV footage missing!

            There is a huge amount of documented evidence you must be unaware of, but so few carry out proper research.

        • Graham

          A building like WTC 7 can only “free fall” into its own footprint when the entirety of it’s core supports and components are “removed”.

          Research controlled demolition and notice how WTC 7 “creased” in all the expected places prior to “dropping”. The European expert who confirmed it was taken out, just likes plenty of other key witnesses who were present on the day.

          NIST eventually admitted to architects and engineers that they couldn’t explain it’s collapse signature. And NIST never investigated for WTC explosive traces despite the preliminary FEMA findings.

        • Curtis

          I’m sorry but the CIA headquarters isnt going to be inside of a weak building that can collapse easily because “ANOTHER” building was hit….if anything it would’ve been the most protected and strongest building in the area.

      • Louise in MO

        In this digital age you can do almost anything with computers to show anything you want. The reason for my skepticism.

        • Graham

          A very true statement. That is why you have to adhere to documented evidence and witness testimony.

          You have to be really careful with the unknown known’s and the assumed known known’s to avoid being consumed in an unknown manner 🙂

      • Patrick Bishop

        did you notice how all the world was watching only one channel abd that no cell phones were working that day

  • DJohn1

    You just made my point. We are dealing with people reacting to a major threat to their entire belief system.
    That is WHY 9/11 occurred.
    That an entire group or groups of people profited from it should be where we should be investigating.

    • Graham

      Yet another cognitive thinker.

      The groups that did profit from it have been named individually. Many know little about the financial angle, as it ran extremely deep.

  • Kim

    The thing is, the day those planes hit, I saw a TV shot from a helicopter that showed a gaping hole right through the middle of building one. When I saw that hole, I intuitively knew the building was coming down.

    Also, in the documentary film called The Falling Man, there were eye witness accounts of planes hitting both buildings (many people called there loved ones from both world trade centers) but from the North Tower, a man called his wife and reported that people were jumping due to the extreme heat yet the flames hadn’t even reached their floor.

    Building Seven’s collapse certainly looks suspicious. I am not so naive to believe our government isn’t capable of such evil, yet Occam’s Razor, the logic of simplicity and few assumptions, tells me all those buildings came down because two jumbo jets full of high octane fuel (99+) crashed into the area causing a cascade of failures. Had this been a conspiracy to bring down the buildings for various reason, it would have been a huge, complicated task to be carried out by many co-conspirators.

    • Graham

      A gaping hole right through the middle of WTC 1? Jumbo jets?

      That helicopter footage would have shown you the people standing at the very edge of the impact zone. What did you make of this despite all the heat and fire?

      Let’s say the top 15 floors collapsed as a complete block (an hour + after impact) due to the hole right through the middle. What held them up for so long?

      Did you note the initial angle this block fell before remarkable physics jumped in and straightened the block back up again?

      Frame by frame analysis would verify the block was pulverised as it had almost vanished before the floors beneath the impact zone started to even move. Strange day indeed, huh?

      If you know how the floors were joined to the core, why wasn’t the majority of the core left standing?

      Did you observe the building parts that remained standing at the start of pulverisation, evaporate into thin air right on camera? CNN footage.

      That is what you call molecular disassociation.

      An estimated 3,500 people knew about the Stealth 117 program for many years. How many opened their mouth prior to it going public in 1991?

    • Josh29

      Lol Kim. Kik me – JoshTheSexy

  • seth datta

    I used to accept the government’s version. Now I believe that the government (working for the uber-rich bankster elite) was responsible for the atrocity, or at the very least knew it was going to happen and allowed it to.

    The international level of complicity is shown when the BBC spoke of WTC7 falling, FIFTEEN MINUTES BEFORE it happenned. Many have drawn the links back to Sir Rothschilds and his family (UK trillionaires) and I have done a previous post on this. Rothschilds plan on controlling the Western nations through terrorism, overt and financial, in order to make the ‘masses’ embrace neo-serfdom. Obviously this will be a horrible idea and must be stopped/defeated at all costs. It is not just his family and there is an internatonal alliance of the uber-wealthy known as the ‘club of 300’. These billionaires (and some trillionaires) ‘control’ the world. Educate yourself, prepare accordingly and know that we have to send these wicked people down permanently.

  • ProclaimingGodsTruth

    You can be sure that God knows the truth. Was this to be a wake up call for America whether conspiracy theory or not?
    To whom much is given much is required – Luke 12:48.
    America has been given much in the past so much is required now. But … we are not making the grade!

  • Randy Townsend

    The leftists have their crazies and so do the conservatives. What is it that is so appealing about the possibility of a grand “conspiracy” responsible for some horrible event? I know, the believers will remain convinced some government mastermind was behind all of this. These same people believe the income tax amendment was never ratified, that Kennedy was killed by government shooters, and Area 51 is a secret landing spot for aliens.

    • John

      So why does the collapse of Building 7 look like a controlled demolition, to experts and casual observers alike? When in history, before or after, has a building come down like this that wasn’t a controlled demolition? Why did Larry Silverstein say, in a PBS interview, that the building was “pulled”?

      You don’t have to believe in aliens to believe that the official story–19 Muslims with box cutters led by somebody in a cave defeated every of law enforcement, national security, intelligence and defence resource in the United States over and over again on 9/11–does not add up.

      Conspiracies aren’t behind every event, but it’s equally naive to think they don’t happen. Go through the newspapers of the last 100 years and count the number of times people have been convicted in criminal conspiracies. I bet you would find quite a few.

      Some people seem to act like it’s impossible that government could lie to us. After everything I’ve witnessed in the last half century, all I can say is “Really?”. That’s incredibly naive. We’ve been lied to many times and there are people sick enough to pull a false flag operation, whether their motive was ideological, financial or something else.

      • Randy Townsend

        I don’t worship the government. However, prior to the attacks, airport security was nothing like it is now. Aircraft doors weren’t sturdy, metal detectors weren’t present, and it is easy to see how this could have happened. And if the conspiracy is as has been suggested, we’ve already lost our freedom to the government and it’s not coming back. IMHO.

      • Graham

        Superb example of cognitive reasoning!

  • DJohn1

    The characteristic problem is Vans. Yes, Vans are either bought and rented and with buildings associated with parking garages. The Vans are loaded with explosives on timers. The timers are set to use the auto battery to blow the explosives with the Van.
    The Van is simply parked in the garage ahead of time. It is usually a vehicle that is nondescript and no one even realizes it is there.
    Several of these vehicles have been caught by our authorities before they could go off. One malfunctioned and didn’t go off as planned. So the likelyhood of it being part of 9/11 is fairly good.

    That it was timed so close to the planes means that who ever did this either had an internet WIFI connection in the building or knew a whole lot about when the plane might arrive. If such an explosion did occur it had to be split second timing on someone’s part.
    Forensics wears many hats. One of which is demolition reconstruction at a scene.
    Security in the building should have caught it before it happened. Obviously they didn’t. We will never know as the head of security died that day.
    At least that is what we were told on the news casts on TV many months after the event. Only God knows the real truth at this point in time.
    It was fated. One way to tell a fated event is you will always remember where you were when the event occurred.
    I remember exactly where I was. I remember where I was when Jack Kennedy died in Texas. So do millions of other people.
    When 9/11 occurred my boss was in Seattle, Washington. I was in Vandalia, OH. I was doing his job while he was supposed to be on a long weekend with family. I ended up doing that job for almost 6 weeks because he had trouble getting back to Ohio. Eventually he rented a car and drove back.
    Was there an internal explosion timed to go off with the plane collision? I think it is likely. Tracking it back from what is left is probably not likely to happen.

    • Graham

      You speak of the vans belonging to a specific removal company, in which several Israeli’s were caught red handed on 9/11? Packed with explosives? That’s the one.

      The owner of the removal company allegedly disappeared back to Israel on one of the last flights out before lockdown.

      We also of course had the dancing Israeli’s, who were also arrested. All had Mossad backgrounds. 63 in total were arrested, inc “art” students. Lol!

      Which countries Prime Minister stated publicly that 9/11 was good for them? Israel.

  • justadad

    That’s not a CGI glitch. The “building” in the video is the elevator mechanical room on top of the building in the foreground. Search the NY skyline for a building behind the tower. It would also have to be taller than the 2 towers from the perspective that this film was taken. Nice try, I won’t buy.
    As to the other blatant “falsehood”, this commentor does not understand simple laws of inertia or the fact that windows won’t stop an aluminum airplane flying @ 300 mph! Try jamming a potato through a french fry cutter and you’ll be amazed at how huch the potato looks like a potato on the other side (albeit sliced in neat sections.)

  • C . Dwigans

    Ed Asner?? Really??? He is an ADMITTED communist socialist!!! If you expect me to give credence to your claims you should keep America hating losers like Asner out of your propaganda!!

  • Visman_77

    As for the digital “glitch” plane video, I work in visual effects and I’m certain after studying this that the building that the plane wing goes in back of is very much in front of the taller tower.
    From this low angle, if the brown building was in back of the tower then it would have to be as tall as the tower itself. And we know that isn’t the case.
    I have done many matte paintings for film and am familiar with perspective. Very familiar. So while I’m not an expert and can’t really comment on what would make a building collapse straight down (though I have some ideas). I can say that the wing dissappearing is not valid. As for the plane “slicing” through the building, it appears to me that the wing (made of relatively light aluminum) is (like the plane itself) practically dissolving into fragments that would then continue traveling through windows and the building in pieces. It isn’t “slicing through” as described by the narrator. It’s doing exactly what I would expect a lightweight aircraft would do. I’m not dead set against questioning the standard theory but Like Michael said, question everything.

  • Ezekiel Lamb

    The great elephant in the room regarding 9/11 conspiracy is the following Daniel 12 “set up” is 625 BC and the Neo/Babylonian empire {re 586/7 Temple destruction of which Daniel would be familiar}+1260 {time/times etc}= 636 AD {+1 to acc for moving BC to AD}and the battle of Yarmouk river ,the takeover of the Holy land by Islam {666 year of the Roman empire} Part 2 625 BC + 1290 = 666 add the remaining 1335 takes you to the year 2001 NY 9/11 perhaps? Eng/Sumerian gematria A=6 B=12 etc Y=150 Z=156 . Mans No is 6 {created 6th day} begin thus 6+Osama Bin Laden. This needs no 6 prefix {not a man} New York. incidentally 6+Adolf Hitler. Coincidence!

  • Not Suprise

    Look at where we are now. The Patriot Act. The airline frisking and patting. The economic false info. The massive guns, ammo and equipment buildup in the government. Its all part of the destruction of the freedom of the middle class and the full the dependency of the populace on the dole while letting the rotten rich bankers get richer.

  • Colin

    My experience as a disabled person on SSA/SSI is that the government is staffed by inept, ignorant bureaucrats. (The government said that I was owed a certain amount of money. I later learn that the government miscalculated the amount I was owed, resulting in an overpayment. The government is now demanding that I pay them back.)

  • Graham

    Most cannot accept truth because they do not know what the real truth is to begin with.

    • Louise in MO

      A person’s perception becomes his reality. However, perception is drawn from a lifetime of belief and study. Hence being convinced that most or all of government is deceitful and cannot be trusted, a person will not/can not accept even elementary facts, and immediately sets out to prove it wrong.

      A person is considered innocent until proven guilty “beyond a reasonable doubt.” The theories of government involvement in 9/11 has not convinced me beyond a reasonable doubt that it was somehow guilty.

      • Graham

        I think you need to take a far closer look at uncovering the “Shadow” government and learn what mechanisms are in place to manipulate the actual government.

        I prefer to look at the known and proven facts, rather than purely theories. It’s the mainstream who focus on the theories to make fools out of people in the hope of preventing them from seeking or discussing the truth.

        The bottom line with 9/11, is far too many unanswered questions need to be fully and properly answered.

  • Yeshua

    Hey send me a note when your website got hacked by Washington’s Russian hackers. The US government does not like websites that describe how they brought down the WTC in 9-11. I give you one month though.

  • Frosr

    Truely you are either a moron, or you have an agenda, but you are disseminating lies and you will be held responsible for your crimes. People this is the most professional looking pile of crap i have ever seen. Why are you sowing strife, who do you work for?

  • Eric D.

    As always, thanks Michael for all your hard work in keeping us informed… as the saying goes… ” the truth is out there…”

  • Guest

    2 Thessalonians 2:9-11

    9 The coming of the lawless one is by the activity of Satan with all power and false signs and wonders, 10 and with all wicked deception for those who are perishing, because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. 11 Therefore God sends them a strong delusion, so that they may believe what is false,

  • Guest

    2 Thessalonians 2:

    English Standard Version (ESV)

    9 The coming of the lawless one is by the activity of Satan with all power and false signs and wonders, 10 and with all wicked deception for those who are perishing, because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. 11 Therefore God sends them a strong delusion, so that they may believe what is false,

  • Ezekiel Lamb

    The 9/11 conspiracy goes back longer than you think,in fact it requires major events in world history to bring it about!
    Daniel 12 “set up” is 625BC and the Neo/Babylonian empire which would destroy the Temple in 586BC of which Daniel would be familiar. Add 1260 {time/times etc} takes you to the year 636AD {add 1 to account for the 0 moving from BC to AD}and the battle of Yarmouk river, essentially the takeover of the Holy Land by Islam{666 year of the Roman empire} 625BC + 1290= 666 add the remaining 1335 takes you to the year 2001 NY 9/11 perhaps? Mans No is 6 {created on 6th day} begin thus 6+Osama Bin Laden A=6 B=12 etc Z=156 calculate the name. the following needs no 6 prefix {not a man} New York. {6+Adolf Hitler 6+Ronald Reagan}

  • threadbare

    Too many holes to believe the official account, but I believe the one video referenced where the plane’s wing goes behind the building is because the building is in the foreground. We have to be careful what we present to others for examination. If we submit anything that is not solid and water-tight they can through out everything else that is said. Just saying. Love the site Michael. Manythanks.

  • threadbare

    2 Thessalonians 2:


    New King James Version (NKJV)

    9 The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, 10 and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 11 And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie,

  • I don’t believe these studies. There was enough jet fuel to do exactly what it did, melt steel. Liquid steel falls straight down, it doesn’t “fall over” as in knocked over. As far as Islam is concerned, when is the United States going to declare the Muslim religion a political organization (what it truly is) and not an organized religion.

    • Sylvia

      Hi John. I’d like to correct you if I may about the Muslim religion, which is actually called Islam. Islam is an organized religion, a very old one historically founded in the 6th century AD. Unfortunately it has been used as a political tool since the late 19th century by radical Muslims who twist it for their own agendas – much like the way Christianity is used as a political tool by right-wing conservatives to get more votes or influence more people about certain policies and issues. As is the danger of all organized religions, blind faith among the masses can be exploited by cunning people with less nobler intentions. And unfortunately, Islam has become more associated with the cunning. There are good Muslims out there who do not believe in Jihad and disagree with that violent ideology.

  • Pale Writer

    Do you think that the controlled demolition of building 7 and supposed contents might have been the target for destruction through demolition all along? And that to bring that building down without an catastrophic event. So that it would have to have insurance coverage and payout for damage that could be happening to loss of property or lives in or around building 7. So then the plot or plan to take the Twin Towers down became the main media’s focal point which almost always means that’s the diversion? No doubt about it. 9/11 was an inside job. And we might never know who or how many actually knew the plan that was predetermined to happen that fateful day for so many. In a conspiracy all lose ends are wrapped up in coffins or urns. I wonder how many people and demolition crew are still alive today? The folks who set the charges in building 7 need to come forward and talk. Nobody sets charges in a structure to fall it without first making safe and secure the building and whole area around it from people who could get hurt or killed. Everyone and their company and the Bank that funded it all are complicit in this evil act of heinous sin then branded terror to take all our American’s Constitutional Bill of Rights civil liberties. That means President Bush was involved with this also. Nothing ever happens at this magnitude without both foreign and domestic powers and controllers in agreement for it to happen.

    Rethink 9/11. And then have Nuremberg trails because there is a natural and moral law from Almighty God that’s higher then any law man,Bank,demon death cult Eugenic and Illuminati church or enemy terrorist foreign or domestic came up with and practiced that day on 9/11. Including the days and weeks prior to it also.

  • Chris C

    A blast furnace works on a simple principle (since the iron age). A fire normally not capable of melting steel or iron has oxygen drawn through it and, yes, produces molten iron. Why is this not ever pointed out when the structural damage to the twin towers created what is essentially a perfect pair of giant blast furnaces?

  • Rick

    9/11 was an inside job. Period. With big Israëli fingerprints on it.