Enjoy The Radioactive Fish: Tests Show Fukushima Fish Are Up To 124X Above Safe Level

Share on Facebook953Tweet about this on TwitterPin on Pinterest1Share on Google+0Share on StumbleUpon20Print this pageEmail this to someone

Black Sea Bream

Are you purchasing radioactive fish at the grocery store?  Are you absolutely certain that you know the answer to that question?  You are about to read about a test that discovered that a fish recently caught off the coast of the Fukushima prefecture was found to have 12,400 becquerels per kilogram of radioactive cesium.  That is 124 times above the level that is considered to be safe.  But it is not just fish caught off the coast of Japan that you need to be concerned about.  In this article I will also discuss a report by the National Academy of Sciences which states unequivocally that Pacific Bluefin tuna have “transported Fukushima-derived radionuclides across the entire North Pacific Ocean”.  In fact, if you just had a tuna sandwich for lunch you may have ingested radioactive material without even knowing it.  Each day, another 300 tons of highly radioactive water is released into the Pacific Ocean at Fukushima, and that means that the total amount of radioactive material that is getting into our food chain is constantly increasing.  And since some of these radioactive elements have a half-life of about 30 years, that means that our food chain is going to be contaminated for a very, very long time.

Strangely, the mainstream media in the United States has been extremely quiet about all of this.  The following is an article from a Russian news source about this highly radioactive fish that was just caught off the coast of the Fukushima prefecture…

Fish with deadly levels of radioactive cesium have been caught just off the coast of Fukushima prefecture, as scientists continue to assess the damage caused to the marine food chain by the 2011 nuclear disaster.

One of the samples of the 37 black sea bream specimens caught some 37 kilometers south of the crippled power plant tested at 12,400 becquerels per kilogram of radioactive cesium, making it 124 times deadlier than the threshold considered safe for human consumption, Japan’s Fisheries Research Agency announced.

That same article also noted that a fish that was caught last year near Fukushima contained a level of cesium that was actually far greater…

The record cesium reading was recorded last year when a fish caught near the plant carried 740,000 becquerels of cesium per kilogram.

Would you eat such a fish?

The truth is that there might be one in your freezer right now.

According to an absolutely shocking report put out by the National Academy of Sciences, it has been proven that Pacific Bluefin tuna have transported highly radioactive material “across the entire North Pacific Ocean”…

“We report unequivocal evidence that Pacific Bluefin tuna, Thunnus orientalis, transported Fukushima-derived radionuclides across the entire North Pacific Ocean.”

Do you buy a lot of tuna?

If so, you might want to start asking some questions.

And there is a lot of other evidence that the food chain in the Pacific Ocean is becoming highly contaminated.  The following are just a few facts from one of my previous articles entitled “36 Signs The Media Is Lying To You About How Radiation From Fukushima Is Affecting The West Coast“…

The population of sockeye salmon along the coastlines of Alaska is at a “historic low”.

Something is causing Pacific herring to bleed from their gills, bellies and eyeballs.

Experts have found very high levels of cesium-137 in plankton living in the waters of the Pacific Ocean between Hawaii and the west coast.

One test in California found that 15 out of 15 Bluefin tuna were contaminated with radiation from Fukushima.

Back in 2012, the Vancouver Sun reported that cesium-137 was being found in a very high percentage of the fish that Japan was selling to Canada…

• 73 percent of the mackerel

• 91 percent of the halibut

• 92 percent of the sardines

• 93 percent of the tuna and eel

• 94 percent of the cod and anchovies

• 100 percent of the carp, seaweed, shark and monkfish

You can read the rest of that article right here.

So once again, are you absolutely certain that you are not purchasing radioactive fish at the grocery store?

The U.S. government says that the fish are safe.

But the government also promised the sailors on the USS Ronald Reagan that they would be safe when they went over to provide assistance in the aftermath of the Japanese earthquake back in 2011.  It turns out that was a lie too

The roll call of U.S. sailors who say their health was devastated when they were irradiated while delivering humanitarian help near the stricken Fukushima nuke is continuing to soar.

So many have come forward that the progress of their federal class action lawsuit has been delayed.

Bay area lawyer Charles Bonner says a re-filing will wait until early February to accommodate a constant influx of sailors from the aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan and other American ships.

More than 70 sailors from that aircraft carrier have reported that they have developed conditions such as testicular cancer, thyroid cancer, Leukemia, “unremitting gynecological bleeding” and brain tumors.  Their lives have been ruined, and nobody wants to step forward and take responsibility.

So are you going to just blindly trust that the government is telling you the truth about all of this?

Out in California, one team of researchers from California State University is so concerned that they are going to start monitoring California’s kelp forest for signs of radiation

Researchers from California State University, Long Beach (CSULB) and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory have launched “Kelp Watch 2014,” a scientific campaign designed to determine the extent of radioactive contamination of the state’s kelp forest from Japan’s damaged Fukushima nuclear power plant following the March 11, 2011, earthquake and tsunami.

Initiated by CSULB Biology Professor Steven L. Manley and the Berkeley Lab’s Head of Applied Nuclear Physics Kai Vetter, the project will rely on samples of Giant Kelp and Bull Kelp from along the California coast.

“The California kelp forest is a highly productive and complex ecosystem and a valuable state resource. It is imperative that we monitor this coastal forest for any radioactive contaminants that will be arriving this year in the ocean currents from Fukushima disaster,” said Manley, an expert in marine algae and kelp.

And as I noted the other day, one independent researcher recently discovered radiation levels near the water at Pacifica State Beach that were up to five times higher than normal background radiation.

The evidence is piling up, and it is becoming clear that the Japanese government and the U.S. government are not telling us the truth.  Of course governments all over the world have not been telling us the truth about a lot of things for a very long time.  This is a theme that I explored extensively in my new novel.  In this day and age, it is imperative that we all learn to break out of “the matrix” and learn to think for ourselves.

Sadly, most Americans choose not to do that.  In the video posted below, activist Mark Dice asks average Americans to sign a petition to repeal the 3rd Amendment and allow U.S. soldiers to commandeer anyone’s home and live there for free.  As you can see, many of the “sheeple” were quite happy to sign the petition without asking any questions…

So what do you believe?

Are the fish that you are purchasing at the grocery store safe to eat?

Please feel free to share your thoughts by posting a comment below…

About the author: Michael T. Snyder is a former Washington D.C. attorney who now publishes The Truth.  His new thriller entitled “The Beginning Of The End” is now available on Amazon.com.

The Beginning Of The End - The New Novel About The Future Of America By Michael T. Snyder
Share on Facebook953Tweet about this on TwitterPin on Pinterest1Share on Google+0Share on StumbleUpon20Print this pageEmail this to someone
  • K

    Seafood is off my menu, unless it comes from some very limited areas in the Atlantic. Places I know to still be safe. But it is not just about radiation. I will not eat anything out of the Gulf of Mexico, because of the chemicals. Do you eat farm raised talipia, you would not if you knew what they are fed. Same with farm raised shrimp. As to the news media, just propaganda anymore. Nothing will be reported to impact profits. The U.S. a Country of the rich, for the rich, and by the rich. When it comes to the Government, or the news media, the rest of us,just do not count.

    • MichaelfromTheEconomicCollapse

      That is a very good point about the Gulf of Mexico. That is something that most of us don’t even think about anymore.


    • goldlions

      OK Where and what sea food/fish are safe?

  • Tim

    I stopped buying Pacific seafood a while back. I bought Wild-Caught Atlantic Cod yesterday at Costco. It was pricey, but it’s very good.

  • DJohn1

    I think we need to start with the Food and Drug Administration or lack thereof.

  • DJohn1

    In a couple of weeks, President Obama will be giving a State of the Union speech. It will sound good anyway.
    But the problem with all such speeches is that whenever President Obama is slightly less than truthful it will all come out fairly soon after the speech. (Oh, how he lied! comes to mind.)
    The question in my mind is Fukushima going to be part of the discussion afterwards and what will President Obama have to say about it?
    I am betting that the entire issue will be ignored even though it effects everyone in this country one way or another.
    I have no idea how to measure what is appropriate levels of radiation and what is not. What kind of measuring tool is appropriate? What is the current treatment for exposure to this kind of radiation?
    Is there some kind of protection one can put in our attics and walls that will minimize the effects of such radioactive materials. Rain and snow come to mind as possible contamination to all of this Fukushima type radioactive levels in our water supply and weather conditions.
    The other question is electricity generation because of consistent bad winter weather taking the power lines down.
    My oldest son and I were discussing this over Christmas Holidays and he seems to think the wisest generators would be diesels. Only because they are capable of a great deal of flexablility when it comes to what fuel they will accept in an emergency.

  • DJohn1

    The other lie-prone field is Health Care. Seems like everything coming out of the mouth of our President is slightly less than the real truth.

    The real test will be in November when people are up for re-election. By then the Health Care issue will either go away or will be prime material to contest the election of a lot of Democrats. So my real question here is how many Democrats are up for re-election in November?
    If what you say is true, there will be a huge increase in radiation-related side effects from all the radiation.
    That in turn means Health Care will have huge deductables on any new policy. That is the way the insurance issue will handle the huge increase in cancer-related diseases due to the Fukushima Radioactive effect world wide.
    Again, what are the real issues that will provide a change at the election booth and a new Congress. I think covering up the environmental issue and the employment issues will mean a huge change in who represents us in the near future. At that point, the truth might even come out.

  • todd

    Seafood Delights For the Objective of Substantive Population Reductions
    (Not for the G o v ‘t elite & other assorted Illuminati – who enjoy stock from private fisheries)


    (made from real Killer recipes!)

    Atomic Tuna
    Cancerous Crab (Zodiac Killer Special)
    Chernobyl Cod
    Contaminated Carp
    EMP Eels
    Fissionable Flounder
    Fukushima Filet
    Hellacious Herring
    Hiroshima Haddock
    Hydrogen Halibut
    Leukemia Kingfish
    Mahi-Mahi Meltdown
    Mutated Marlin
    Proton Pike
    Radiated Rock Bass
    Transmuted Trout
    Unholy Mackerel
    Yellowcake Tuna


    Alpha Anchoves
    Beta Particle Blowfish
    Bleeding Gills
    Cesium Cavier (Toxic but tasty! Enjoy, you’re gonna die anyway)
    Centrifuge Clams
    Critical Mass Mussels
    Enriched Eyeballs
    Gamma Grunions
    Isotope Sushi
    Kelp Forest Salad (Run Forest Run!)
    Leaky Leeks
    Overheated Octopus
    Pollock Polyps
    Spilled Starfish Guts
    Uranium Sea Urchins


    Cooling Water (Coolant – served in a roll-up tank)
    Ground Zero
    Nuclear Nestle’
    Uranium Red Bull

    • todd

      Will new health plans have to be written, that specifically exclude radiation exposure?

      • md

        The problem is when a cancer or an infection shows up, it is treated without any effort or even recognition as to the cause. The patient dies of the disease caused by the failure of the immune system, ignoring the real root of the problem

  • Chuck

    Any calculations as to when the Atlantic (and other oceans) becomes contaminated?

  • Rodster

    No seafood for me. I guess the Presstitutes are too busy making up stories about how great the economy is to be bothered with news like this.

  • commonsensepolicy

    The governmental silence over this issue is extremely concerning as it will effect millions of people’s health. Ultimately every ocean world wide will become contaminated reported by a nuclear physicist in the last week.

    The most important role anyone that understands the implications of this Nuclear Disaster can take is to educate people on this grave matter, on any level possible. Unfortunately there is a main stream media black out regarding this disaster which will compound the amount of cancer related disease.

    I would recommend people remove fish from the menu across the entire pacific ocean for starters.

    As time goes by the full implications of this disaster will be released by government and media, at which point it will be to late for millions of unfortunate people. If you have found yourself reading the above article consider your self fortunate.

    In regards with the US official reason for radiation levels up to five times that of background radiation on the West coast of the US, it has been caused by red painted knife and forks made in the nineteen thirties?

    Believe what you like, but I am not buying it, sounding more like a Government Conspiracy Theory to me.

  • Kim

    There is a picture on the internet of conjoined whales that beached on the west coast of northern Mexico. Yeah, conjoined whales. If I’m not mistaken, this is a first, but it won’t be the last. Google it for yourself.

  • Hammerstrike

    On the otehr hand, all those dead fishs and birds on the west coast and other regions doesn´t have radioactivity.

  • Randy Leifer

    It’s simply not enough of a scare to mention that minute amounts of Cesium have been detected in fish.
    There are background emissions, there are increased detectable amounts and charts compared prior and after Fukushima. There are half-life measurements in regard to pacific nuclear tests back in the 1960’s…….all these should be considered before taking a stance.
    People (consumers) eat simple “it’s not good for you” stuff, as truth….no matter what website they visit.

    I’m sure you don’t want to be the one who believes something “just because it’s on the internet”. Check each and every one of the 15 claims to see if they pan-out as “related”. I have….each one.
    Don’t just believe a headline…..that’s dangerous too.

    It’s not so “cut-and-dry”…..suggesting “it’s all Fukushima”.
    I find all this as bloated misinformation, led to scare people.
    Perhaps then, they will buy the book.
    We must all realize that there is a huge market to scare the public into buying certain products, while avoiding others.
    It’s marketing….”radioactivity has doubled, tripled (or spiked) in fish since Fukushima.”…..when in reality none of the fish you will eat are in that category (fish living directly near Fukushima), or that the radioactivity (even if doubled) means little-to-nothing in an issue of scale or health.
    Stand in the sun too long, example.
    Perhaps we say “don’t go hiking around certain types of natural rock” because cesium is also found there.
    “Don’t use granite countertops” because they may be radioactive in some way, and infect your food and children”.
    Perhaps they should buy a geiger-counter, before a kitchen counter.
    This an alternate opinion to the above fear article.
    This may get deleted, though a screen-shot has been taken, just in case.