Has The Era Of Genetically Pure “Gattaca Babies” Now Begun?

Share on Facebook233Tweet about this on Twitter0Pin on Pinterest1Share on Google+2Share on StumbleUpon8Print this pageEmail this to someone

Aborted Baby - Photo by drsuparna

Should selective breeding be used to improve the human race?  Should we genetically screen embryos shortly after conception and choose only those that are the most genetically pure?  This may sound like science fiction, but as you will read about below, the technology for this is already operational.  On the 18th of May, a couple in Philadelphia gave birth to a baby that came from an embryo that was selected thanks to a cutting edge procedure known as “next-generation sequencing”.  This procedure allows scientists to read every letter of the human genome very rapidly and very cheaply.  So will millions of parents soon be lining up to check their potential offspring for “genetic abnormalities”?  Has the era of genetically pure “Gattaca babies” now begun?

This new technology is being heralded as a great “breakthrough” in the field of human fertility.  According to the Guardian, the scientists that helped develop this new procedure are promoting it as a way to help couples produce a much higher percentage of “healthy” babies…

The first IVF baby to be screened using a procedure that can read every letter of the human genome has been born in the US.

Connor Levy was born on 18 May after a Philadelphia couple had cells from their IVF embryos sent to specialists in Oxford, who checked them for genetic abnormalities. The process helped doctors at the couple’s fertility clinic in the US select embryos with the right number of chromosomes. These have a much higher chance of leading to a healthy baby.

The birth demonstrates how next-generation sequencing (NGS), which was developed to read whole genomes quickly and cheaply, is poised to transform the selection of embryos in IVF clinics.

And aren’t healthy babies a good thing?

Of course they are.

But what about all of the babies that are “discarded” in the process?

Dagan Wells, a fertility specialist at Oxford University, screened 13 different embryos for the couple from Philadelphia.  His testing helped them select the “best” one

After standard treatment at the US clinic, the couple had 13 IVF embryos to choose from. The doctors cultured the embryos for five days, took a few cells from each and sent them to Wells in Oxford for genetic screening. Tests showed that while most of the embryos looked healthy, only three had the right number of chromosomes.

“It can’t make embryos better than they were in the beginning, but it can guide us to the best ones,” said Wells.

So what happened to the less desirable embryos?

That is a very good question.

Unfortunately, this is just the beginning.  A second baby that came from an embryo that went through the same kind of screening process will be born in the United States next month.

Of course fertility clinics have been helping parents select the “best embryo” for years.  But now this new screening process is being hailed as a much more “scientific” way of improving the chances of producing a “desirable” baby

Embryo screening involves separating embryos with the best chance of producing a pregnancy from those with chromosomal abnormalities.

Traditionally it has involved a “beauty contest” in which technicians pick out the best-looking embryos for transfer to the womb.

But this technique is highly unreliable, since even an embryo that appears “textbook perfect” under a microscope can harbour hidden defects.

And parents certainly don’t want any “hidden defects”, do they?

A lot of scientists involved in this field of research truly believe that they are doing a wonderful thing for parents.  They are fully convinced that helping parents transform the process of fertility from “a game of craps” into a process that they can control is a worthwhile endeavor…

Lee Silver, a professor of molecular biology and public policy at Princeton University, urged the audience members to look at someone sitting next to them.

“That person and you differ at over 1 million locations in your DNA [deoxyribonucleic acid]. Most [of these variations] don’t do anything,” Silver said. “[But] even if you are a healthy adult, 100 [of these] can cause deadly childhood disease in your children or grandchildren.”

“Mother Nature is a metaphor,” he continued. “And it is a bad metaphor, because in reality inheritance is a game of craps … It won’t have to be that way in the future.”

But where does this end?

At first, they may just weed out babies that have a high chance of getting sick or being deformed.

Next, parents may start selecting babies based on hair color, eye color, etc.

And eventually, “defective” embryos may be banned entirely because they would be “too much of a burden on society”.

Can you see where this is going?

Back in 1997, a movie entitled “Gattaca” came out that envisioned a world where those that are not “genetically pure” are greatly discriminated against.  The following is a summary of the plot for the movie…

Vincent is one of the last “natural” babies born into a sterile, genetically-enhanced world, where life expectancy and disease likelihood are ascertained at birth. Myopic and due to die at 30, he has no chance of a career in a society that now discriminates against your genes, instead of your gender, race or religion. Going underground, he assumes the identity of Jerome, crippled in an accident, and achieves prominence in the Gattaca Corporation, where he is selected for his lifelong desire: a manned mission to Saturn’s 14th moon (titan). Constantly passing gene tests by diligently using samples of Jerome’s hair, skin, blood and urine, his now-perfect world is thrown into increasing desperation, his dream within reach, when the mission director is killed – and he carelessly loses an eyelash at the scene! Certain that they know the murderer’s ID, but unable to track down the former Vincent, the police start to close in, with extra searches, and new gene tests. With the once-in-a-lifetime launch only days away, Vincent must avoid arousing suspicion, while passing the tests, evading the police, and not knowing whom he can trust…

At the time, nobody ever dreamed that we would actually see such a thing in the real world.

But these days technology is moving at a pace that is absolutely mind blowing.

And now, it is reportedly even possible to create babies that have DNA from more than two parents.  In fact, scientists in the UK have just been given the okay to start creating embryos with DNA from three parents

A technique to implant donor DNA from a third party into in vitro embryos has been approved by the British Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). The technique is a form of “germline” alteration that involves modification of the person’s mitochondrial DNA (MDNA) to create genetic changes that will be carried on throughout subsequent generations.

The recommendation to allow the technique follows a public consultation ordered by the government in which the HFEA said they found “broad support”. The report said that the potential benefits outweighed the risks and that there is no evidence that the procedure is unsafe.

The HFEA report said that it should only be used to avoid “serious diseases” and that clinics offering the technique must be licensed. It also recommended that the children created using this genetic alteration technique be monitored.

As technology continues to advance, will their be any limits on what is possible?

One Harvard professor is even trying to recruit someone to give birth to a Neanderthal baby.


The following is how the Daily Mail described this very strange story…

Professor George Church of Harvard Medical School believes he can reconstruct Neanderthal DNA and resurrect the species which became extinct 33,000 years ago.

His scheme is reminiscent of Jurassic Park but, while in the film dinosaurs were created in a laboratory, Professor Church’s ambitious plan requires a human volunteer.

He said his analysis of Neanderthal genetic code using samples from bones is complete enough to reconstruct their DNA.

He said: ‘Now I need an adventurous female human.

‘It depends on a hell of a lot of things, but I think it can be done.’

We are moving into a time when genetic manipulation of the human race is going to become commonplace.

Scientists are assuring us that there is absolutely nothing to be concerned about.

Unfortunately, they have no idea what they are messing around with.

About the author: Michael T. Snyder is a former Washington D.C. attorney who now publishes The Truth.  His new novel entitled “The Beginning Of The End” is now available on Amazon.com.

The Beginning Of The End - The New Novel About The Future Of America By Michael T. Snyder
Be Sociable, Share!
  • Hammerstrike

    Yes, it should!

    Without natural selection, humans populations just goes down the glory hole.

    Still, better to make an embryo that is genetically healthy than make a dozen embryos which all get disregarded except one, kinda like the “In Vitros” in the “Space Above and Beyond” serie.

    “A second baby that came from an embryo that went through the same kind of screening process will be born in the United States next month.”

    “In fact, scientists in the UK have just been given the okay to start creating embryos with DNA from three parents…”


  • seth datta

    Humans are already socially engineered through ‘organised stalking and electronic harassment’ and through control of their finances, such as the welfare state. GM babies will herald the end of the human age, for will such babies ‘have a free will’, especially when they can be modified in utero to be more compliant serfs?

    • Hammerstrike

      These compliant serfs already exist in their natural state.
      Only 30% of adults by the age of 40 have full cognitive ability.

      Crush the weakness!

  • Dave Webb

    The entire process of reproduction is full of death. Only one sperm cell in thousands completes the process of becoming a baby! Playing at being God does no one any good.
    Each and every month a fertile female has a period. Where do you think the blood comes from?

    I am one of millions of defective children. I have a disease of the eyes called “Lazy Eye.” This disease is inherited. So we check our grandchildren to make sure it hasn’t showed up. It is curable before the age of ten. Instead of going cross-eyed (which is another genetic related disease, we reject the vision in the brain and are virtually blind on one side.)
    Buried within the human code is over 400 genetic diseases. Any one of which can show up at any time.
    We are as far as I know the only species on the planet with two Double sized Chromosomes. Instead of 48 we have 46 chromosomes. That is direct evidence of manipulation in our recent past. Possibly this occurred some time in the last 200,000 years.

    Yet we seldom hear about this. Were our ancestors pure with 48 chromosomes or are they 46 chromosomes like us?
    What I want manipulated is lifespan. We are pre-disposed to live 70-110 years. Some even live to 120. No one lives longer than 126 years.
    I want all 400 of those genetic errors eliminated from future generations. Now that would be a positive thing.
    Nature eliminates a lot of children in every generation because we have miscarriages. That is children with genetic diseases that prevent them from reaching birth.
    Cancer, Diabetes, Heart Disease, are all partially genetic. And they cause a lot of tragic results.
    Nature eliminates a lot of people because the codes are in error. So given a choice, I think figuring out how to eliminate those genetic diseases, I personally would not exist. But the person in my place would be genetic error free!
    That is the ideal. The fact is no one has the knowledge to do anything like that, with the exception of the Creator of everything on this planet. Until we have a whole lot more knowledge eliminating those 400 diseases won’t happen.
    But those babies killed won’t help anything. Right now we have at least 6 billion and possibily as many as 8 billion people on this planet. Each one is a unique individual. Until we have a lot more information, eliminating future generations with genetically diseased people is only a very bad dream.

    • Tatiana Covington

      Actually there are 4000 inherited disorders. Two are universal: scurvy and uremia. That’s because we can’t make the enzymes gulonolactone oxidase and urate oxidase.

      But we are on the verge of curing these problems permanently.

      • Hammerstrike

        Which is a good thing, BTW!!