Obama’s Top Science Advisor John Holdren Advocates Mass Sterilizations, Forced Abortions And A Global Police Force

Share on Facebook1.6kTweet about this on TwitterPin on Pinterest5Share on Google+0Share on StumbleUpon2Print this pageEmail this to someone

john-holdrenMost Americans have never even heard of Barack Obama’s top science advisor. 

So who is he?

His name is John P. Holdren, and he co-authored a book in 1977 in which he advocated mass sterilizations using the food and water supply, mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children, forced abortions for American couples trying to have too many children and a global police force to enforce population control.


This is Barack Obama’s top science advisor.

Holdren advocated these horrific proposals in the 1977 book entitled “Ecoscience”, which he co-authored with Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich.

When reports of Holdren’s book first started to surface, they were quickly dismissed by many because it just seemed so unbelievable that the top science advisor to the president of the United States would hold such bizarre beliefs.

However, once one blogger posted pictures of the pages of Holdren’s book up on the Internet, people started to realize that Holdren really did write these things.

Let’s take a look at some of the more shocking quotes from Holdren’s book.

On page 837,  it is written that compulsory abortion would be perfectly legal under the Constitution of the United States:

“Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”

On page 786, the book says that single mothers should have their babies taken away by the government and that they could be forced to have abortions if the government decides that is best:

“One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.”

On pages 787 and 788, the book advocates the mass sterilization of humans by putting drugs in the water supply:

“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.”

On pages 786 and 787, the authors discuss sterilizing women after their second or third child:

Involuntary fertility control

“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.

The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

On page 838, the authors state their belief that there is nothing wrong or illegal about the government dictating family size:

“In today’s world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?”

On pages 942 and 943, the authors call for the development of a “planetary regime” that would control the global economy and enforce population control measures:

Toward a Planetary Regime

“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.”

“The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”

On page 917, the authors advocate the surrender of national sovereignty to an armed international police force:

“If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization.”

The truly frightening thing, however, is that Holdren is not just one isolated nutjob.  Rather, his views are an accurate representation of what is commonly believed among the global elite.  They believe that the earth is way too overpopulated, and that if totalitarian measures are not taken it will have catastrophic consequences for the planet.

Those scientists who advocate eugenics and radical population control are funded and promoted by the global elite.  In fact, prior to becoming Obama’s top science advisor, Holdren was the Teresa and John Heinz Professor of Environmental Policy at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.

The truth is that the global elite are absolutely obsessed with reducing the population of this planet, and it would be a huge mistake to underestimate their obsession with population issues.  If you have any doubt about this fact, then you should read this article which we posted on a sister blog.

It is NOT acceptable for a member of the president’s administration to believe in mass sterilization, forced abortions for American women and a global police force.  Please contact your representatives in Congress and ask them to call for the resignation of John Holdren.

The Beginning Of The End - The New Novel About The Future Of America By Michael T. Snyder
Share on Facebook1.6kTweet about this on TwitterPin on Pinterest5Share on Google+0Share on StumbleUpon2Print this pageEmail this to someone
  • – “If I were reincarnated, I would wish to be returned to Earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.” — Prince Phillip

    – “We’re too many people; that’s why we have global warming.”…. “Too many people are using too much stuff,”… “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal,” — Ted Turner

    – “The [government] must put the most modern medical means in the service of this knowledge…. Those who are physically and mentally unhealthy and unworthy must not perpetuate their suffering in the body of their children…. The prevention of the faculty and opportunity to procreate on the part of the physically degenerate and mentally sick, over a period of only 600 years, would … free humanity from an immeasurable misfortune.”
    — Adolph Hitler

    – “The per capita income gap between the developed and the developing countries is increasing, in large part the result of higher birth rates in the poorer countries…. Famine in India, unwanted babies in the United States, poverty that seemed to form an unbreakable chain for millions of people–how should we tackle these problems?…. It is quite clear that one of the major challenges of the 1970s … will be to curb the world’s fertility.”
    – George Bush Sr.

    With the words from those well known signatures… it is clear that forced population control and eugenics is nothing new… and frankly speaking… when removing biblical ethics “from the table”… such thoughts do make sense… or?… survival of the fittest?… rather than socialism?

    Anyway, it makes sense to me out of the fact, that the core of the problem haunting homo sapience with respect to maintaining a sustaining environment in this world “of ours” is, that the world population is far, far too high.
    And, as for eugenics, I think the ludicrous election of US presidents ought to speak favorable of that element. 🙂

    My firm opinion is that the world population must be reduced, one way or another, and it’s future growth rate must be curbed. Under the present poulation growth rates, the world population willl reach 9. billion within 30. years! That is 30% more than the present about 7. billion. Well, I find it plain grotesque, cruel and inhuman by the world leaders if they allow this to happen… FTP!

    Ted Turners population of 250-300 million would of course put an end to his and others most profitable CO2 scam that he initiated, but, somehow I do believe that he is willing to scrap that business for a world recuperating from the perpetual rape it is subject to.

    However, as far as I can see, the problem with overpopulation is slowly taken care of through the effect of environmental contamination, i.e. the effect of the plastic age with its numerous chemicals introduced to human nutrition, and which slowly (but ever faster) reduces the fertility of mankind in the western world. (More than 85 percent of the 80,000 synthetic chemicals registered have never been assessed for their effects on human health (!), and in 2002, an estimated $2.9 billion was spent on infertility treatments in the United States alone…. hmmm?… there is a new an profitable business in every misery created by mankind, aint it? 🙂

    A drawback is however, that this environmental contamination effect is mostly prevailing in the western world, and not where the birth rate is real high, like Asia and Africa. But with the help of several “aid programs”, the chemicals caused infertility is of course also taking effect in the poor “underdeveloped” parts of the world, although far to slow and ineffective to reach Ted Turners figures in his lifetime.

    Anyway, the numerous synthetic agents which act as hormone mimickers including dioxin, PCB’s, DDT and other pesticides, all work well for the reduction of the world population… or at least reducing their intellect and normal function to start with.

    But, the most promising and surreptitious solution to the problem of world over population lies with MONSANTO I think. Gene manipulation. Recently I read an Austrian study on animals which concludes that GM corn has an unquestionable negative effect on fertility, and also cause changes to the genetic makeup which we cannot predict or understand fully at present. However, oservations like reduced kidney weight, infertility, and abnormal gene expression are serious consequences… even more so because they often did not show up until the third or fourth generation.

    This means that if GM foods cause similar health problems in humans (why should it not?), we will not know it until it is too late for our children or grandchildren. Still to late for mr.Turner and Mr. Holdren to observe of course, but GM foods are most probably fulfilling their goals and dreams.

    Well then folks, enjoy your breakfast with gene manipulated corn flakes and milk from gene manipulated food fed cows. You will make the dreams of Prince Philip, Papa Bush, Ted Turner, John P. Holdren, and the whole shadow government of the western world come through.

    And finally, an even quicker solution to getting rid of the redundant mass of humans, is of course to release a nasty “swine flue” and only give a working vaccine to Turners 250-300 millions.
    Far fetched? Nope! It is not that long ago that smallpox infected blankets was distributed to the americans indigenes.

    Being an old Norwegian atheist myself… I am not hampered with any doctrines associated with religion… and hence I do not hold any feelings which favor humans above other life on this planet… hence I am of the opinion, that if the species homo sapience shall survive, it must be curbed… ’cause if not… the flora and fauna around us… upon which we all depend… will perish, and so will we.

  • Pat

    There is no doubt that over-population is happening. But the idea of putting contraceptives in water has not been thought through – the effect on animal life and sea food. Should it be effective the resultant reduction in food supplies would follow. How this would help the situation is not a positive result, leaving a food supply deficit even with a reduced polulation. These high up people are trying to play god, without the benefit of an all seeing and knowing data-base. Quote “Well meaning fools can do as much damage as those with an evil intent”.

  • infertility could be a thing of the past with our modern day stem cell technology’.”

  • Jack

    The question is what is more humane. Perpetual war or population control?

    • Rumbling Mike

      Let’s start by removing you from the gene pool.

  • Jack

    Doctors are partially to blame for overpopulation. By letting the weakest survive and multiply, evolution has gone wrong, and is no longer a factor as far as humans go, that’s why people are so dependent on medications these days.

  • SusanSiobhan

    This is just another demonstration of the fact that most people on the right seem to be unable to read on the 8th grade level. The headlines are contradicted by the content.

  • SusanSiobhan

    Finally, it is not acceptable (paraphrasing the editorial content here) for members of a president’s administration or legislators to deprive women of their right to abort.

  • ThatGuy

    Overpopulation? By whose standards? The UN itself said the ‘carrying capacity’ of the Earth was 40 billion+.

    It’s not too many people, it’s how they are distributed. If you subscribe to the ‘blame humans first’ philosophy, then you should be the first to punch your own ticket.

  • Ann

    This great investigative post doesn’t deserve such idiotic comments. Why is it that people repeat the dogma imposed by those in power without having a clue about what they are talking about?
    “There is no doubt that over-population is happening”… says who? Holdren, Gates , Prince Phillip and all the other elitist sons of bitches who we, the vermin work for. It’s shocking to see to what extent people have internalized totally unfounded and unproven statements and are so unaware and unconscious about the reality surrounding us, thanks to the garbage published by the mass media, as to read a post about eugenics and nazi policies and show their agreement with such policies based on the very lies created by this elite thus allying with such inmoral and evil behaviour.

  • I know it’s a scary idea, but every once in awhile it might be worth reading a whole book, just to really understand someone’s argument.

    There are some folks who claim that the major gist of what he was saying was all of these forced sterilization ideas are worst case scenarios, things that might happen is we don’t embrace voluntary birth control.

    We know from studying other mammals that sit high on the food chain that overpopulation is a self correcting problem. We’ve got pretty good brains, but it’s a complicated world. We don’t really even understand the weather, but the little we know about things like positive feedback loops give the folks who study them pause.

    And of course, I have to laugh at the anti-abortionists crying “government interference.” As Anton Scalia would say: “It can go quite the other way.”

  • There is not any truth: in everything that was said. Does show how easily the public base their knowledge on hearsay. Its all about manipulation, by people who laugh as they steal from decent values.

  • Forced adoption, forced abortion or forced to keep the baby are case scenarios that are completely avoidable. But you can look for a positive reason to embrace any of these 3 options after pregnancy. When I am primarily motivated by lust and I have no real love or commitment to another person (much less any conceived child);

    my choice options will be painful and hurt me spiritually, emotionally and physically, because all 3 options are forms of “Damage control” to rescue me from my bad choices in life; so that I can hide from the naked reality that my life choices permanently hurt me and others!!!

    Ask God and the person you mated with to forgive you, forgive yourself and live the abundant life, free from lust. Meet your own sexual needs and stop defrauding others while single; and after you commit to love another person, then you can enjoy sex and children with no fear or regret of your circumstances.

  • Valen

    If humans do not control the speed of population growth on Earth, there will eventually be a much less pleasant consequence: food shortage, water shortage and pandemia. Think Spanish Flu, but with Ebola or SARS 🙁 A government having to force things is always bad! It would be better if they educated people better and try to make them see their reasons for birth control promotion (government: free choice, but we advocate a maximum of 2 children per family and we only pay allowances for max 2 children per couple). Next to that mass production of meat and fish should be forbidden: too many animals too close together and next to that the transportation of live stock worldwide is only facilitating the spread of any potention pandemic virus…