Michael T. Snyder's Shocking New Novel About The Future Of America
Beginning Of The End - Kindle Version by Michael T. Snyder
Survive After Collapse

Recent Posts

Archives

Emergency Essentials/BePrepared
Sold Out After A Crisis

Subscribe By Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Russia And China Prepare For The Day When They Will Nuke The United States

China Nuclear Attack Against The United States

While Barack Obama is busy gutting the U.S. nuclear arsenal, Russia and China are rapidly preparing for the day when they will nuke the United States.  To most Americans, it sounds very strange to hear that Russia and China are concerned about nuclear war.  After all, isn’t the Cold War over?  Isn’t that what politicians from both major political parties keep telling us?  Unfortunately, the truth is that Russia and China both consider the United States to be their number one geopolitical threat, and both nations have been systematically strengthening and updating their strategic forces.  At the end of last month, Russia held a large-scale military drill that involved the launch of four nuclear missiles, and the Chinese government released a major report for the public which included maps showing what would happen to major U.S. cities in the event of a nuclear attack by Chinese submarines.  Obama may blindly believe that wishful thinking and unilateral disarmament will keep the United States safe, but Russia and China are taking a much different path.  Both of them believe that a military conflict with the United States in the future is quite likely, and they are rapidly preparing for that eventuality.

The major nuclear drill conducted by Russia at the end of last month made headlines all over the planet…

Russian strategic forces carried out a large-scale surprise military drill on Wednesday, launching four nuclear missiles that were closely monitored by U.S. intelligence agencies, U.S. officials said.

The drill began around 9:00 am ET and included the test launch of two land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and two submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs).

But this was far from an isolated incident.  In fact, it has been reported that Russian missile forces will hold more than 200 drills during the second half of 2013.

Things have very much changed in Russia since the end of the Cold War era.  Back then, Russia did not have a lot of money to put into the military.  But now Russian President Vladimir Putin is working very hard to strengthen and modernize Russian nuclear forces…

Russia is developing several new missiles, including a weapon U.S. intelligence agencies have assessed as a covert intermediate-range nuclear missile called the RS-26 that is being developed and tested in apparent violation of the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty.

The Russian government has denied the RS-26 violates the INF treaty and claims it is a new ICBM, which some arms compliance experts say is a violation of the 2010 New START treaty.

Russia is also developing a new submarine-launched ballistic missile and a new class of missile submarines.

The missile submarines are of particular concern.  Russia has introduced a new “near silent” nuclear submarine which is far quieter than anything the U.S. currently has…

The Borey Class submarine, dubbed Vladimir Monomakh, has a next generation nuclear reactor, can dive deeper than 1,200 feet, and carries up to 20 nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM).

Each of these “Bulava” ICBM’s can carry ten detachable MIRV warheads, what they call “re-entry vehicles,” capable of delivering 150 kiloton yields per warhead

These subs have the capability of approaching the coastline of the United States without us ever even knowing that they were there.

Most Americans do not realize this.

Most Americans also do not realize that Russia has more spies inside the United States today than it did at any point during the Cold War.

Russia is more of a threat to the United States today than it ever has been before, but the American people are completely and totally oblivious to this.

Meanwhile, China is publicly bragging about what their nuclear submarines could do to us.

Late last month, the Chinese government released a report which included maps which showed the projected results of a nuclear strike on major U.S. cities.  This report was heavily covered by government-controlled media outlets in China such as China Central TV, the People’s Daily, the Global Times, the PLA Daily and China Youth Daily.

The following are a couple of excerpts from that report…

“If we launch our DF-31A ICBMs over the North Pole, we can easily destroy a whole list of metropolises on the East Coast and the New England region of the U.S., including Annapolis, Philadelphia, New York, Boston, Portland, Baltimore, and Norfolk, whose population account accounts for about one eighth of America’s total residents.”

—–

“Because the Midwest states of the U.S. are sparsely populated, in order to increase the lethality, [our] nuclear attacks should mainly target the key cities on the West Coast of the United States, such as Seattle, Los Angles, San Francisco, and San Diego.”

In recent years, China has been working hard to develop a new generation of inter-continental and submarine-launched nuclear missiles.  The following is from a recent article posted on the Washington Free Beacon

China is rapidly expanding its nuclear forces with new missiles, submarines, and warheads. At least one of the warheads is based on warhead designs stolen from U.S. nuclear weapons laboratories in the 1990s, U.S. officials have said.

The submarine-launched missiles that they have been developing are of particular concern.  The following is from a recent article posted on Investors.com

China’s sub fleet is reportedly the world’s second-largest, with about 70 vessels. About 10 are nuclear-powered, and four or more of those are nuclear ballistic submarines.

In 2010, the Type 094 Jin class entered the service. It is capable of launching 12 to 16 JL-2 missiles with a range of about 8,700 miles, covering much of the continental U.S. with single or multiple independently targetable re-entry vehicle warheads.

Do you remember a few years ago when a Chinese submarine fired a test missile from just off the west coast of the United States?

The U.S. Navy did not even know that the sub was there.  If that missile had been fired directly at Los Angeles, it would have been incinerated long before the U.S. government could ever have responded.

Are you starting to get the picture?

In response, the Obama administration will not even comment on this latest Chinese report…

The Obama administration declined to comment on Sunday on provocative state-run Chinese media reports outlining Beijing’s nuclear war plans, including land-based and submarine-launched missile strikes on U.S. cities that would kill up to 12 million people.

State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf and Pentagon spokeswoman Cynthia Smith would not respond when asked about the highly unusual Chinese reports published Oct. 28 in numerous major Communist Party-controlled television and newspaper outlets.

The Chinese reports included maps showing nuclear strikes on Los Angeles and the Pacific Northwest, along with the resulting radiation plumes stretching thousands of miles across the western United States.

You see, the truth is that talking about what China is doing does not fit in with the Obama administration’s “progressive agenda”.  Obama has been systematically disarming America, and most Americans do not even realize that it has been happening.

Most Americans just continue to believe that we still have a very robust strategic nuclear deterrent.

Unfortunately, that is no longer the case.

Back in 1967, the U.S. military had more than 31,000 strategic nuclear warheads.

Since that time, the U.S. strategic nuclear arsenal has been reduced by about 95 percent,

The START Treaty that Obama agreed to back in 2010 will limit both the United States and Russia to a maximum of 1,550 deployed strategic nuclear warheads.

But that is not nearly enough of a reduction for Obama.

Back in June, he declared that “after a comprehensive review” he has decided that the United States can reduce the number of our deployed nuclear warheads by another one-third…

After a comprehensive review, I’ve determined that we can ensure the security of America and our allies, and maintain a strong and credible strategic deterrent, while reducing our deployed strategic nuclear weapons by up to one-third.  And I intend to seek negotiated cuts with Russia to move beyond Cold War nuclear postures.

That would leave us with around 1,000 warheads.

And thanks to the various treaties that we have signed, Russia will know where most of those warheads are located.

So this makes a scenario in which Russia and China collectively conduct a first strike against the United States much more conceivable.  If Russia or China knows exactly where our warheads are, it would be very easy to take most of them out in less than 10 minutes with a submarine-based first strike.

Of course most Americans never even think about such things anymore, and our politicians certainly are not talking about them.

But Russia and China are thinking about these things, and they are rapidly preparing for the day when war comes and they choose to nuke us before we nuke them.

About the author: Michael T. Snyder is a former Washington D.C. attorney who now publishes The Truth. His new thriller entitled “The Beginning Of The End” is now available on Amazon.com.

Michael T. Snyder's Shocking New Novel About The Future Of America

The Beginning Of The End - The New Novel About The Future Of America By Michael T. Snyder
Be Sociable, Share!
  • Tatiana Covington

    If so then it’s Ragnarok.

  • J N

    But USA too has best nuke weapons platform,, It can even damage Russia n China in greater way than both can do to USA,, but Nuke war between these countries are not possible in near future. no country want to destroy them self,,

    • SheepleCatcher

      You are disillusioned. Russia and China have the worlds best mobile ICBM’s such as the DF-31A/SS-27/RS-24/DF-41 and many others. Not to mention the amount of bunkers and preparation that have been done for civil and military defense for the coming Global conflict.

      Does the Chinese 2nd artillery great wall ring a bell ?

      • Hammerstrike

        How can that be?!? Murika is dat land of teh free, muh freedom! Muh freedom down der throats!

      • Sinyail

        If Russia and China simultaneously launched nukes at the US then the US would simultaneously launch nukes at Russia and China. It’s called mutually assured destruction. Ever ask yourself why no nukes are flying around at the moment? That’s why.

    • Truman Golden

      Russia has the most silent submarines in the world. Americans call them “black holes” because they can not be detected. 2012, a submarine armed with long range nuclear cruise missiles costed for several weeks around california and mexico and was never detected. Russia is deadly. my advice to my country is to continue picking on little countries after we placed them under sanctions for years so they can’t defend themselves. Iraq after years of sanctions defeated america after a long protracted war. we americans are cowards.

      • Rabid Cat

        US and its coalition were *not* defeated in Iraq. That is a positive outcome without even coming close to playing hard ball.

        • Truman Golden

          LOL are you watching the news lately? Whole Iraq came under Iran control (indirectly) for few years, now the rebels are regrouping and taking large swats of the country. what did america do? murder 2million people and leave.

  • Colin

    One of the issues with nuclear weapons is their fallout. So, a nation nukes another nation, that attacking nation may find itself under a fallout cloud. Destroy one nation, pollute your nation.

    • Hammerstrike

      That is why atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki caused radiation poisoning in California.

  • mijj

    Russia and China to nuke the US? Sounds like a good idea. Might slow down the US Regime’s endless worldwide genocide plundering and destruction.

  • K

    If you see the nukes fly. Know that arrangements have been made, to assure we do not respond. Maybe why so many senior generals are being fired?

    • Hammerstrike

      Perhapse Obama himself gets fired, with a nuke.

      Afterward, it becomes clear some of jhis supporters have betrayed his governement, in order to establish a new one under Chinese Control.

    • Robert Gemerek

      That’s absurd…..we have systems which would automatically counter attack as well as attempt to intercept incoming missiles. We could’ve wiped out russia when they collapsed in the 90′s but we did not. Same with China at the beginning of the 1900′s. History shows, so far, that humans appear quite unwilling to risk world wide suicide because the survivors or “winners” would be living in a hellish nightmare, probably not for very long either. Extinction would be likely. Nobody would win. We can drop nukes from satellites in space. We have Haarp, laser weapons, microwave weapons, railguns…..believe me if we go down, so will everyone else.

  • DJohn1

    The problem with nuclear weapons is no one wins. Everyone does not pass go and collect their 200 dollars. Nuclear is so World War II. Now if you have a place heavily congested like China does the nuclear might make sense if you wanted to take out their main advantage which is people. The survivors of such a conflict will be faced with going back to the stone age. Radioactive has no friends. It kills everyone on both sides. So someone explain why anyone thinks nuclear is the way to go?
    Laser gun technology has advanced to the point where it might just be able to shoot most of the missiles out of the air. Who has laser guns? I don’t know. But if we are taking down the nuclear missiles then someone does. Probably our military is keeping it top secret.
    Space warfare is not science fiction. It is fact. The Russians have the rocket technology and the robotics to make it so.
    So have we only ours works a lot more often than theirs do. That Martian Probes program is evidence of just how far we have come in that technology.
    Why Space? Because one ten ton rock diverted to collide with the planet is not only clean it is deadly. It can take out a major city and it looks like a natural disaster. There are a lot of ten ton rocks orbiting the Sun fairly close to Earth orbits. Robert Heinlein is considered the Father of modern day Science FIction. In his book, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, he described a war being fought between Earth and the Moon colony. He described big rocks being used against major nations. They pinpointed a minor island in the South Pacific and demonstrated what they could do.
    Ten ton rocks at the right angle automatically go at 5 miles per second. When they hit they are nothing more than a blob of molten iron/nickel lava and they hit at tremendous speed. That is why nuclear no longer is the weapon of choice. So dismantling an obsolete potentially dangerous missile program makes sense to me. If it is done gradually there is no harm to the population.
    The problem with space rocks is the change it makes in the orbit of our planet around the Sun. We could end up closer or further from the Sun. The Earth’s crust on which the continents are a prime example are sitting on a layer of molten lava. Geologists know more than I do on this. But what happens if you crack that surface with these large rocks at huge speeds? We could be dealing with a volcanic and earthquake problem world wide. So even space rocks are not completely ideal in making war on each other.
    We are a small planet covered with water with a land mass approximately 1/7th of the surface. The rest is covered with oceans. Specifically we have a huge ring of volcanoes all around the Pacific Ocean and even in the middle of that ocean around Hawaii. No other planet known has such a thin crust and such a dangerous time bomb waiting to go off like it did in the 1880s. That 1880s destruction caused an island to blow up and essentially go into orbit around the planet. Scientists are still studying it to make sure it doesn’t happen again. Hope they succeed.
    The point is it is time to grow up. We are one of many nations around the planet with loaded guns. It is like 260 people in a little room with half of them covering the other half with loaded 45 automatics. Just one of those 260 people goes crazy and the rest of the people in that room are in for one big disaster than no one can recover from.
    China and Russia specifically have to grow up and quit trying to conquer or militarily try solutions to their problems. It won’t work. The very people trying this war solution know this. So why do it?
    Somehow they think it won’t get to them by doing it! Got bad news. It will come back and most likely leave them all dead as well as us.
    The solution is to do a massive war on solving our problems. That will work. If these governments including our own would war against the problems we need to solve like continuing to feed our populations, like making the 6/7ths of oceans habitable, like solving our mortality problem, advancing medicine to cure cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and other diseases, and many more we can make this planet liveable for the rest of humanity. Let us increase lifespan to 200 years. Then reduce population growth with serious birth control until we gain the rest of the planet.
    The Chinese have done a lot of this. A lot of people live and survive their entire lives on boats off their shores. They are making serious attempts to limit population growth.

    Planned human genetics by rewarding the right people to have children is well on its way to becoming real. Again, breeding people is not new. Heinlein described it in several books. People were given money to mix their family lines and produce genius level children. We know how. It is a matter of doing it. Science Fiction of 30 years ago is now fact. He described an experiment in longevity genetics.

    China right now is the greatest natural breeding ground for advanced human genetics there is. Imagine billions of people making every conceivable combination of genes. India is not far behind them. It is a giant bell curve where a small fraction create huge advances in genetic gifts. That bell curve also creates children on the other end of the spectrum. If 10% are unusually gifted, then at least 10% are on the ungifted and disabled line. It is complicated.
    For any advancement to happen, we have to get off our seats and make it happen. That cannot be done with all those weapons pointed at each other.

    • Hammerstrike

      Radioactivity is overrated, that is, unless someone built a doomsday device ala Strangelove.
      Remember that Hiroshima and Nagasaki are 1st world cities today, not radioactive wastelands.

      The Chinese military have much better technology and means than the US military back in 1965, with good enough guidance systems they´ll be able to intercept most of the US attack using nukes.
      They also have a vaste network of underground tunnels with everything needed to rebuild

      Also, chain of command, this is no longer the cold war as far as the US concerned, base and submarine commanders cannot launch their attack on their own.

      Just destroy the chain of command or its mean to send the orders, this will open the path to destroy US ability to launch a missile attack.

  • Kim

    Fukushima Diiachi will take care of all of us, in time.

    • j christensen

      that was my first thought. they can save the ammo. Japan going to nuke us in slow motion.

      • Marc

        The problem for them is that they also nukes themselves…

        • stue

          kamakazi all over again!

    • Burkehearts

      I agree

    • Andrew

      Fukushima Diiachi will not kill us.

      For one we are thousands of kilomertres from the reactor. Two even in the Chernobyl disaster most of the radiation has cleared up so only the Chernobyl suburb of Pripyat and the surrounding area at fatal levels of radiation. This has even came to the point that about 500 researchers live there now to study it. So chances are we wont die

    • Yuri Kim

      I highly doubt China would nuke the U.S. The only country China hate the most is Japan.Everybody in China would be more than happy to nuke Japan than U.S.

      • Robert Gemerek

        I’ve heard that as well, lots of Chinese hate japan for what they did when they were both at war. your really pretty btw : )

  • Defiant White

    Stupid article. The world economy is so intertwined that not only is there no desire to nuke anybody but no need. Cui bono? As nuclear clouds circle the earth and China and Russia are struck in retaliation, who wins? Who profits? I don’t doubt that the Russians are holding drills and the Chinese are rattling their swords. But you have to look deeper into the politics, bureaucracy and social systems in those countries to understand why . . . not just jump to the silliest conclusions . . . which by the way, motivates survivalists, preppers and the uninformed to buy more stuff from this web site . . .

    • jim_robert

      You’re right. That’s exactly why Russia and China are eliminating all their nukes in response to the US reduction. Cui bono applies to many wars fought – but they STILL happened.

      And if you don’t believe in a modicum of preparedness, then buena suerte to you. Just don’t show up at my door if you have a problem

    • Hammerstrike

      Please tell us how atomic tests in US territory ( 1,054 tests by official accounts) caused lethal fallouts in Australia or India. Oh wait, didn’t happen? Too bad!

      Contrary to blind fear-mongering, radiations from thermonuclear war wouldn´t last very long, half-life is far too short, unless all the warheads are cobalt-jacketed.

      What happen if the world economy is doomed anyway? Continued financial irresponsability, solar storm, pandemies.

      In that case, better to cut short a regime that only stir up problems and would only delay any future recovery, maybe even decide to take China and India down with them.

      Look at Hiroshima and Nagasaki a few decades after WW2, major first-world cities, not uninhabitable wastelands, unlike in Tom Clancy´s books, Japan never again troubled the United States.

      Thus, it is definitively in the Chinese governement and nations interest to wage this war.
      If the Chinese leadership was a bunch of gutless cowards unwilling to make such plans, they would never have been able to make China a superpower in the first place.
      China would be weak, miserable, far more populated (no 1 Child policy and much less imports).

  • SheepleCatcher

    Here is a Georgetown university video on China’s development of underground great wall’s beginning from the 1960′s:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOSf5n9mOi8

  • Piglet

    The Chinese have no need to nuke the US. All they would have to do is stop lending the US government money and dump their dollar holdings. Other nations would quickly follow suit. The US economy would collapse without a shot being fired. They know it, and we know it. Instead of a radioactive US, they would have one that was broke, helpless and intact – a much better alternative. The US is still looking at competing internationally the old fashioned way – with military forces and nukes. The Chinese are a step ahead and have already put us in a position where they can declare “checkmate” without resorting to war. Pretty clever.

    • Hammerstrike

      If Obama becomes President-for-Life, íf US governement and the European Union becomes fully totalitarian entities, then China will still face troubles later in the future.

      They´ll eventually find themselves facing more efforts to divide south-east asia. NATO fleets blockading oil going to China or ressources going from African countries to China so the european union economy gets more of it and so on.
      Even if the Chinese fleet could smash NATO ones in outright battle, protecting large-scale trade across entire oceans would be far more difficult.

      Not so unlikely that someone in the US decides to take China and India down with the US, seems unlikely right now but who knows what happen after SHTF.

      If the great spending spree doesn´t bring down the world economy, then solar storms or pandemies likely will.

      So the world economy being too intertwined for a major atomic war is complete bollocks.
      It did not stop the British Empire from starting a war with the German Empire 99 years ago.
      Suppose back then, the German Empire had instead annhilated the R.N. and blockaded the British isles from France and isolate France from the Russian Empire, causing Italy and Japan to join on the side of the central Powers instead.

      It lay in China´s interest to expand into Africa or South America to be ressources-sovereign, both to feed its population and industry.
      No United States trying to stir up troubles also mean that China doesn´t have any problems with neighbouring countries.

      • Rabid Cat

        India is an ally.

    • Yuri Kim

      Yeah, seeing as things are going between China and Japan. I am quite sure China would rather nuke Japan.

  • PPTA

    If you read Ezekiel, chapter 39, verse 6, “And I will send a fire on Magog, and amoung them that dwell carelessly in the Isles.” Isles, translates out of Greek into Continets. North America. And if you notice, the United States isn’t mentioned in the end times. Why? We are already destroyed internally, by Obama. And that is very close. Read it yourself. Or, stay in denial, scoff at it. We are rapidly coming to that place where there will be no turning back.

    • Hammerstrike

      Today´s israel would nicely fit being Magog.
      The great majoriity of them there are disrespecting the bible´s deity´s commands and those supporting that state of affairs in the US would also be punished with fire.

      More likely than israel being attacked by by muzzie countries, not out of humanitarianism but out of fear of nuclear consequences for Meddina and Mecca, is the israeli governement going down hard on what it sees as fundamentalists.

      • PPTA

        You are not a Christan who reads tyhe bioble, or you are a p[erson who has no understanding. Magog was a grandson of Noah, who settled the up remote parts of the North. Look him up in Genisis. You also have never read Ezekiel, chapters 37, 38, and 39. I suggest you do. Israel isn’t even close to being Magog. You must hate Israel.

        • Hammerstrike

          Tell that to those people who believe in a prophecy of a future war campaign against israel by Magog and their leader Gog and they use Ezekiel 38-39 to back that.

          trackingbibleprophecy.c o m / images / gog_magog_war.g if

          Most israelis today disrespects the commands of the bible, what does the Lord do to them when they are disobedient, according to the bible?

          If you support the current state of affair in israel, then you are the one definitivel going against the Lord of the bible.

          If the israelis who doesn´t follow the biblical commands turn on those that does, who will you support?

  • Chey Barnes

    The only people who want nuclear plants and nuclear weapons now are the wealthy corporations that manufacture them, and the politicians they have bankrolled. More nuclear weapons = more nuclear reactors = more meltdown disasters.

    Electronic weapons, psychotronic weapons, high-altitude weapons, ultra-low frequency weapons, scalar weapons, plasma weapons, electromagnetic weapons, sonic and ultrasonic weapons, laser weapons,chemical, biological and environmental weapons, climate weapons, tectonic weapons, nuclear weapons! When are we going to say enough is enough??

    • Hammerstrike

      LOL at the nuclear fear mongering.

      Good enough safety standards in France for example are quiet enough to prevent meltdowns.

      So the answer is more nuclear reactors, a lot more of them, reduce oil consumption.

      • Chey Barnes

        Sure thing Hammerstrike. There have only been 26 nuclear “accidental incidents” since 1957. That’s a really great track record, just one every 2.15 years.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_and_radiation_accidents

        Fortunately, only caesium-137, Iodine 131, Tellurium 129, Strontium 90 and plutonium were released at Fukushima. Other emissions that could have been discharged such as carbon 14 have a half-life of 5,730 years, and are deadly for tens of thousands of years.

        The World Nuclear Association estimates that 20 percent of
        nuclear reactors worldwide operate in areas vulnerable to earthquakes. In light
        of the fact that earthquakes are increasing on this planet at an unprecedented rate, even simple solutions,such as harnessing the hydro power of the tides, wind and solar power are far preferable to the ever present danger and potential looming disaster that nuclear power represents. Not to mention all the suppressed Tesla technologies that we discovered over 100 years ago, and technologies designed to harness the energy of the earth’s magnetic field –all of these are preferable to horrific nukes.

        Even well-known, well-intentioned scientists sometimes push bad
        ideas. Some are under the mistaken
        impression that nuclear power is virtually carbon-free, and thus must be pushed
        to prevent runaway global warming, but each dollar spent on a new reactor buys
        about 2-10 times less carbon savings, 20-40 times slower, than spending that
        dollar on the cheaper, faster, safer renewable energy solutions that make
        nuclear power unnecessary and uneconomic.

        Further, High-level radioactive waste management and
        disposal of highly radioactive materials created during production of nuclear
        power and nuclear weapons are daunting. Of particular concern are two
        long-lived fission products, technetium-99 (half-life 220,000 years) and iodine-129 (half-life 15.7 million years) which dominate spent nuclear fuel
        radioactivity after a few thousand years. The most troublesome transuranic
        elements in spent fuel are neptunium-237 (half-life two million years) and plutonium-239 (half-life 24,000 years). Consequently, high-level radioactive waste requires sophisticated treatment and management to successfully isolate it from the biosphere. This usually necessitates treatment, followed by a long-term management strategy involving permanent storage, disposal or transformation of the waste into a non-toxic form; all of which contribute to the high cost of maintaining nuclear reactors. Nuclear reactors are not a cheap solution and the dangers, coupled with the pollution they create, make it simply not worth it.

        • Hammerstrike

          “Steam explosion at Mihama Nuclear Power Plant kills 4 workers and injures 7 more”

          Except quantities of radiation released have been minimal in most of these accidents

          Do you know how subduction work?

          “such as harnessing the hydro power of the tides, wind and solar Power”

          Hahahahaha! That is why these need to be massively subsidized by governments in order to work.

          kajm.deviantart.c o m / art / This-Is-Where-Wind-Turbines-Come-From-368795351

          • Otter

            Hello Hammerstrike! I be Kajm. Thanks for the mention!

  • jim_robert

    Do you mean to say just chanting “Yes we can/Yes we have no bananas” wont’ save me?????”

  • Hammerstrike

    1) They do´t believe Russian missiles would be accurate enough to destroy US silos and even if they did, there would still be submarines.

    2) They don´t think that Yeltsin, Putin or any likely Russian presidents would start a thermonuclear war in the first place, even one where the US wouldn´t be able to hit back. Toxic geopolitical consequences.

    3) The Chinese governement have a far too small arsenal to launch a first strike.

  • Preparation H

    Granted, a nuclear exchange is the worst possible contingency, but it is only a possibility. I shan’t espouse classified information here, but as a rule of thumb, Russian ROE is to use nukes first. If the fatal end were to come, learn how to survive a CBR attack and get some KI tablets (potassium iodide) to manage the fallout. Also, the biggest concern is beta fallout, presuming you survive a neutrino blast. In this case, seal your windows and doors, and wear a mask, also keep a good deal of red wine available (that’s why the ruskies drink it on subs). Bottom line, victory tends to favor the prepared. For any other information, respond through this forum, as this is a moderated site, and this is not my real name…

  • Arizona

    SINCE george washington was warned in valley forge,in 1777,the future of america depended on STICKING CLOSE to the LORD,america no longer depends on GOD for protection,they now rely on THE ANTI-CHRIST oboozo,this is going to prove a very BIG mistake,and the wheat and teres are now being shown for who they are ,the NATIONS of the world are getting ready to destroy THE EVIL, THAT has came upond their families,they warned and they warned,THEIR WARNINGS HAVE FALLEN ON DEFT EARS,…8 nations will bring america to its knees,and you won’t even realize your own police gangs and military,who have always HATED YOU, helped to make it happen……………..

  • Johnyy Ashman

    I america gets nuked, who is going to buy all that cheap crap made in China?

    • mijj

      so why are you buying evil socialist China’s cheap crap instead of angelic capitalist American cheap crap? .. have you no self-respect? .. do you hate America?

  • Sinyail

    lol what a bunch of tards

  • Yuri Kim

    WHAT? Give me a break. The only country China would POSSIBLY nuke would be Japan! The two countries hate each other. China and U.S. depend on each other mutually.

  • Peaceman

    The world should seems fair, but it never happen, and also difficult in the future, U.S. have lots of powerful weapons, who will feel safe if he unlike to obey the rules what U.S. expect? what we should do is trying to understand each other, think more for the next generations on the earth. we hope the war among big countries never happen….

  • Paula Lusby

    God created this universe, he will be the destroyer of it, Read your Bibles. He will come as the destroyer, if it is already destroyed then how can HE destroy it? that would make him a liar, let God be true and every “MAN” a liar.

  • todd

    I normally agree with the author of this article on everything. But this one strikes me as over the top, as it fleetingly touches on the concept of U.S. deterrence.
    “Mutually Assured Destruction” (MAD) has worked all through the Cold War and beyond.

    Even a substantially reduced U.S. arsenal could still easily rain utter annihilation on Russian and Chinese cities. We don’t do Pearl Harbor or “dense pack” anymore — in effect, putting all our eggs in one basket. ICBMs, aircraft, subs, carriers?.. they couldn’t hit them all. Military installations are hardened, so EMP would not likely be effective in frying the electronics.

    The Orientals and Slavs are too much like us, in many ways. They have ***a strong instinct for self-survival.***

    MAD works with everyone except those who ARE mad. Think of those who willingly strap bombs around their chests for far *lessor* targets. How much *more* if they can REALLY hurt the United States. And Israel.

    Instead, we should be more concerned about rogue regimes in Iran and other places. Even the fat boy in North Korea wouldn’t lob a nuke at us. What the real danger is, with him, is his outright willingness to sell the technology to those who WOULD use it, for some much needed hard cash.

    And so, the threat posed by China and Russia are real, but in my view, over-focused here. I don’t say this out of any trust for our own national leaders, today. (They likely have their own bunkers ready, regardless.)

    Khrushchef was wrong when he said, “We will bury you.” We made it real simple for them. We’re burying ourselves.

  • Mari

    I had an interesting dream about 3 weeks ago. In this dream I was watching a nuclear bomb coming over my city. I was waiting for it to detonate ( I could see the flames in back). Instead it made a sharp U turn. When it did this I could see it’s nose. On the right side was written America (horizontally) and on the left side was a woman wearing a red head scarf and a red worker’s type of shirt. Then I woke-up.

  • Mari

    I had a dream where I saw a nuclear bomb coming over my city. I watched it waiting for it to detonate. Instead it made a sharp U turn and when it did this I could see it’s nose. On the right side was written America (horizontally) and on the left was a woman wearing a red head scarf and a red worker’s type of shirt. Then I woke-up. This dream was about 3 week’s ago.

  • Mari

    After my dream I typed in on my computer about nuclear attacks on America and that is how I found this site.

  • RCN

    Let’s not fall for another deception in which we believe Obama is wishfully hoping for unilateral disarmament because he believes he’s protecting anyone. All the puppets have roles to fill. His is that of betrayer, which explains better the disarmament, obamacare and other devastating actions of the president. His current interactions with Putin and the media lies show false posturing. In reality it furthers the agenda to which even Obama is committed – even if it means his fall.