The President of the United States is asking the American people to inform him about the private conversations and political beliefs of anyone who would dare to oppose Obamacare.
On the official website of the White House, officials in the Obama administration are asking their supporters to inform them of any viewpoint on Obamacare they see or hear that they consider to be ”fishy” – even if it is in casual conversation with their own family and friends:
“There is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there, spanning from control of personal finances to end of life care. These rumors often travel just below the surface via chain emails or through casual conversation. Since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to firstname.lastname@example.org.”
A YouTube video produced by members of the Obama administration that explains this new informer program is below…..
On July 30th, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 2749 – The Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009. This bill, the centerpiece of big agriculture’s war on organic farming in the United States, gives the U.S. government such unprecedented control over independent and organic farmers that some are calling this proposed law “fascism on the farm”.
H.R. 2749 has been given this very deceptive name: “The Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009″, but the reality is that it has very little to do with food safety. Instead, concerns about food safety are being manipulated by big agriculture to push through a law that will devastate their smaller competitors.
You see, every major case of food contamination in recent U.S. history has come from large-scale industrial agriculture – not from small farms.
But who will this new law hurt the most?
Small independent and organic farmers.
In fact, these proposed new regulations are so overwhelming and so draconian that they will even discourage people from growing family gardens in their own backyards.
The reality is that this bill is an effort by the big agricultural corporations who control 90% of the food production in the United States to crush their remaining competition. The losers in all of this will be the American consumers who will have fewer and less healthy food (Read More...)
Most Americans have never even heard of Barack Obama’s top science advisor.
So who is he?
His name is John P. Holdren, and he co-authored a book in 1977 in which he advocated mass sterilizations using the food and water supply, mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children, forced abortions for American couples trying to have too many children and a global police force to enforce population control.
When reports of Holdren’s book first started to surface, they were quickly dismissed by many because it just seemed so unbelievable that the top science advisor to the president of the United States would hold such bizarre beliefs.
Civil libertarians are increasingly alarmed by the trend towards increased political repression in the United States. Political candidates and organizations that are out of favor with the establishment are now being labeled as “dangerous” and as “potential terrorists” in official government reports.
For example, on February 20, 2009, the State of Missouri issued a report entitled: “MIAC Strategic Report: The Modern Militia Movement.”
This shocking report labeled individuals who supported presidential candidates Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and Chuck Baldwin as “dangerous” and inferred that those individuals are potential terrorists.
In addition, people of various ideologies were singled out as being potentially dangerous.
The report instructed police and other government officials that the following political views are “dangerous” could signal a potential terrorist:
*Anyone opposing abortion
*Anyone opposing illegal immigration
*Anyone who believes that the New World Order is a threat
*Anyone who is against the North American Union
*Anyone who is against the income tax
*Anyone who has a negative view of the U.N.
No left-leaning political ideologies or organizations were identified in the report. Neither were Islamic extremists mentioned. Apparently (Read More...)