Michael T. Snyder's Shocking New Novel About The Future Of America
Beginning Of The End - Kindle Version by Michael T. Snyder

Recent Posts

Archives

Emergency Essentials/BePrepared
Sold Out After A Crisis

Subscribe By Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Survive After Collapse

The Population Control Agenda Of The Radical Humanists Who Would Love For You And I To Die

Billions of dollars is being poured into an effort to reduce population growth all over the world, and most people do not even know that it is happening.  These efforts are often promoted under such labels as “family planning”, “abortion rights” and “public health programs”, but the primary goal is always to get women to have less children.  This population control agenda has millions upon millions of supporters all over the planet and it is gaining even more adherents with each passing day.  It is being taught in colleges, universities and schools all over the globe.  It is being promoted by radical humanists who are completely and totally convinced that the core crisis that humanity is facing today is that there are way too many people living on this planet.  They fully believe that overpopulation is the root cause of most of our economic, social, political and environmental problems.  In fact, the truth is that many of them actually believe that they are literally in a “life or death” race to save the planet.  Many of the “true believers” are entirely convinced that if human population numbers are not greatly reduced from where they are now, the planet we are living on will be completely destroyed.  That is why many of these radical humanists would absolutely love for you and I to die.  From their perspective, the less people the better.

Many that write about the population control agenda make it sound as if there is just a “tiny elite” that is promoting this philosophy.  Sadly, that is simply not accurate.  The truth is that this twisted agenda is being taught at the majority of the colleges and universities in the United States.  It is being promoted in our television shows and in our movies.  It is even being taught to elementary school children.

As a result, more Americans that ever are embracing this philosophy.  You would be surprised how many people actually believe that our growing population will soon cause major shortages of food, water, oil and other important resources.

For example, the following is an excerpt from one comment that was left on one of my previous articles about population control….

It is undeniable, the earth is being completely destroyed and while the planet could theoretically sustain probably between 13 to 16 billion people, this would require 2 developments to occur:

1. There would have to be a global resource-rational production & distribution scheme which would ensure that each person could have enough air, water & food, in an environment where, due to the resulting scarcity on clean resources, excess & hoarding would be directly correlated with human death.

2. There would have to be a dramatic reduction in the quality of life for a dramatically higher percentage of the world’s population than currently experience miserable lives.

Rather than accept these awful outcomes of unfettered industrialization, let us instead embark on a course to drastically limit the global population to around 500 million.

Does that figure sound familiar?

It should.  That is the exact target number for the global human population that we find on the Georgia Guidestones.

But when the population of the earth was back at 500 million did we still have poverty, war, famines and other similar problems?

Of course we did.

Reducing the population of the planet by more than 90 percent would not wipe out any of our problems.

But this sick agenda is being endlessly promoted in the mainstream media.  For example, during a recent radio interview HBO personality Bill Maher stated that he is “consistently pro-death” and that he wants society to find ways to get more people to die off…

“I’m pro-choice, I’m for assisted suicide, I’m for regular suicide, I’m for whatever gets the freeway moving – that’s what I’m for. It’s too crowded, the planet is too crowded and we need to promote death.”

You can hear Maher making these comments right here.

If you think that is sick, just check out this next example.

Two “scientists” recently published a paper in the Journal of Medical Ethics in which they called for the legalization of the murder of newborn babies.  Instead of “murder”, they want it to be called “after-birth abortion” instead….

“[W]hen circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible. … [W]e propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus … rather than to that of a child.

Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk.”

Isn’t that disturbing?

Actually, you would probably be surprised at how many people there are that will read this article and find nothing wrong with the idea of “after-birth abortion”.

Respect for life is rapidly declining in our society, and a big reason for that is because the population control agenda is being pushed at our colleges and universities.

Just check out this quote from an actual classroom lecture by MIT professor Penny Chisholm….

“The real trick is, in terms of trying to level off at someplace lower than that 9 billion, is to get the birthrates in the developing countries to drop as fast as we can. And that will determine the level at which humans will level off on earth.”

There is something deeply insidious about specifically targeting the “developing countries” for population control.  Do you think that Professor Chisholm really understands the full implications of what she is saying?

This sick population control agenda is also being heavily promoted in Europe.

A recent article by Jurriaan Maessen discussed a document entitled “Scenarios for a One Planet Economy in Europe” that was produced by a EU-funded think think called the “One Planet Economy Network”.  One of the goals of the One Planet Economy Network is to “help transform Europe to a One Planet Economy by 2050.”

Scenarios for a One Planet Economy in Europe” examines four different scenarios that could play out as Europe moves toward a “green” future.  The following is a quote from a section of the report that discusses a scenario entitled “Breaking Point”….

“The EU must take strong measures to limit population growth both in Europe, but more importantly in the rest of the world in the face of increasing demand at a time when technological innovation is stagnant and global shortages (e.g. of fossil fuels and agricultural land) are pushing up prices. In some European countries, life expectancy stagnates; in others it falls.”

Once again, we see an example of where population growth for “the rest of the world” is considered to be absolutely crucial.  And that tends to be the attitude of many of these radical humanists.  It is always “someone else” that is the biggest part of the problem.

Farther down in the report, it is suggested that financial coercion could be used to motivate families to have less children….

“Beginning in 2012, one of the measures taken to control population growth was to phase-out child benefits for multi-children families. By 2020, benefits were only provided for up to a maximum of 2 children. As the economy in general has become more labour intensive, immigration policies were relaxed in order to attract low skilled labour, especially for the agriculture sector. This further adds to social tension in the EU. Bilateral trade deals require trading partners to implement population control measures.”

But population control measures are not just something that we will see in the future.  The truth is that UN agencies and non-governmental entities are already implementing population control measures all over the globe.  They are often called “family planning programs” or “free sterilization drives”, but the goal is always to get women to have less children.

And in many of the wealthier countries we are also seeing fertility levels steadily drop.  Thanks to all of the garbage in our food, air and water it is getting harder and harder to get pregnant.

A recent article by Anthony Gucciardi included the text of an email from a biotech scientist who admitted that he was aware that his work was contributing to reduced fertility.  What you are about to read is absolutely stunning….

**********

In the email, the biotech scientist known as ‘Ed’ explains how he thinks it’s absolutely ‘awesome’ that GMOs are contributing to infertility, as he believes the world is overpopulated. He also attacks me personally for my work on warning the public over the dangers of GMOs (particularly the latest news over the research linking GMOs to organ failure and tumor development). As of right now we have not released the full name of ‘Ed’ nor his organization, but we may in the future after considering the legal concerns.

Here is the Full Email:

I am no traitor against humanity. If this **** causes infertility… Awesome!!

The world is over-populated, and people need to stop having children. This is one of earth’s largest problems.

If the earth wasn’t overpopulated, things like growth hormones wouldn’t EXIST.

The reason they do, is that the earth cannot produce enough food on its own to feed us all.

This is why GMO is actually saving the planet.

So **** you and your ********. I am doing humanity a ******* FAVOR!!!

Sincerely,

A REAL ‘traitor to humanity’

– Ed

You can also view the screenshot for yourself here.

**********

Many of those promoting genetically-modified foods for the public actually privately insist on organic foods for their own families.

They know what they are doing, but they truly believe that it is good for the planet.

For these radical humanists, the ends often justify the means.  Many of them are entirely convinced that humanity is only going to have a bright future if the global population is reduced dramatically.  So they are willing to take extraordinary measures for “the greater good”.

The mindset of some of these radicals is absolutely frightening.  For example, Dave Foreman, the co-founder of Earth First, once said that reducing the global population to 100 million is one of his three primary goals….

“My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world.”

This kind of philosophy rises to the surface in some of our most trusted publications quite often as well.

For example, Time Magazine once ran an article entitled “How To Die” that explained why it is a good thing to kill off the elderly.

Newsweek actually once ran an article entitled “The Case For Killing Granny“.

Sadly, there was not a massive national uproar over either of those articles.  Yeah, a few people were upset, but most Americans did not get seem too disturbed.

The truth is that the American public is starting to buy into the propaganda that getting married and having children is not such a great thing.

Today, an all-time low 44.2% of all Americans between the ages of 25 and 34 are married, and fertility rates in the U.S. are steadily dropping.

Back in 2008, the average number of children per woman in the U.S. was 2.1.

By 2011, that number had fallen to 1.9.

So the numbers are definitely going in the direction that population control advocates want.

This twisted philosophy is even represented in the White House.  Barack Obama’s primary science adviser, John P. Holdren, once co-authored a book in which he advocated the mass sterilization of American women.  The following is just one of the incredibly disturbing quotes from Holdren’s book….

“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.

The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

And this population control agenda was even reflected in the new health care law.  It is not an accident that sterilization won’t cost women a single penny under Obamacare.

They want U.S. women to choose sterilization.  They want to make it as easy for them as possible.

The more women that get sterilized, the less children that will be running around.

There is so much more that could be written about the population control agenda of these radical humanists.  The following are 10 of my previous articles about this issue….

#1They Love Death

#2From 7 Billion People To 500 Million People – The Sick Population Control Agenda Of The Global Elite

#3Al Gore, Agenda 21 And Population Control

#4The Green Agenda Is About Getting Rid Of As Many Humans As Possible

#5Governments Around The World Are Eagerly Adopting The Strict Population Control Agenda Of The United Nations

#6Yes, They Really Do Want To Reduce The Population – 22 Shocking Population Control Quotes From The Global Elite That Will Make You Want To Lose Your Lunch

#7One Less Child? Environmental Extremists Warn That Overpopulation Is Causing Climate Change And Will Ultimately Destroy The Earth

#8Hillary Clinton: Population Control Will Now Become The Centerpiece Of U.S. Foreign Policy

#9New U.N. Report: We Must Reduce The Population To Fight Climate Change

#10To The Global Elite The Math Is Simple: Human Overpopulation Is Causing Climate Change So The Solution To Climate Change Is Population Control

So what do you think about all of this?

Please feel free to post a comment with your thoughts below….

Be Sociable, Share!
  • Washington

    On August 28, 2012 the Susan B. Anthony List (SBA List) announced the launch of a $150,000 television ad campaign across Missouri highlighting President Obama’s extreme record on abortion and featuring abortion survivor Melissa Ohden. Missouri has recently been at the center of the conversation on abortion.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwFIEprF_9Y&feature=player_embedded

    Jun 16, 2011 Produced By: Magdalene John An abortion survivor, Melissa Ohden shares her remarkable story of survival with reporter Magdalene John.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdm-i62hRdc&feature=related

    • J-d

      Pro-Death are killing themself, Pro-Life are defending others.

  • Washington
  • Gary2

    Michael–as I have said before when you re-post these population articles:

    I have never driven down a road and wished for more traffic. I have never stood in line and wished there were more people in lines. I think if the population of the USA could be lowered by 1/3 to 1/2 the quality of life for the remaining would be a ton better.

    When I was visiting my mom in Southern CA everywhere we wanted to go regardless of the time was hurry up and wait. Disneyland would have been a lot more enjoyable with 1/2 of the people not there– The ocean/beach would have been a ton better if only 1/2 of the people were there–see what I mean by better quality of life?

    Look at countries like Bangladesh or China or India or other African countries. They would be a lot better off if 1/2 of the people were not there. We do not have unlimited natural resources. Do you realize 1 in 5 people on this planet are Chinese? WTF?? Are they that dumb in China to keep having kids??

    However–I am not qualified to judge nor do I have a solution on how to get from here to there. Probably need free universal birth control. We can tax the rich to pay for it.

    • tez

      Gary, might I suggest you be the first to offer yourself up for elimination… Hell! I’ll even bare the expense of paying for which ever procedure you choose. I’m against population control, but in your case, I’ll make an exception.

    • http://mises.org Lily

      K, how would YOU and your loved ones like to be included in that other half that you suggest shouldn’t be here?

      Statists yearn to redistribute the wealth and earnings of others. This is inherently wrong as theft is immoral. Be responsible for yourself and stop insisting that the state be your nanny. Create your own solutions? Don’t depend on others to do things you want/need done. Those that call for population reduction should consider beginning with themselves.

      Force and/or coercion is reprehensible and unnecessary to run this world once everyone is on the same page with similar understandings, therefore, a voluntary, compassionate system would be much preferable.

      See fff.org or http://voluntaryist.com for more information on the humanity loving ideas of liberty.

      • Gary2

        Please re-read the original post–you must have missed the end part below.

        However–I am not qualified to judge nor do I have a solution on how to get from here to there. Probably need free universal birth control. We can tax the rich to pay for it.

    • Gary2

      Michael–can you please give me your opinion on my post? I genuinely am interested in your take on it-especially the part of never wishing for more traffic or people in lines.

      • Michael

        Gary it is true that our major cities are overcrowded. But there are vast stretches of land that have very low population density all over the United States. We need to quit cramming so many people into the major metropolitan areas.

        Michael

        • JoF

          People are moving back to cities that are already overcrowded and guess why. Higher gas prices means it costs more to get to work. And where are the bulk of the jobs (those that are still around anyway) – in the cities. Doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure that out.

        • Gary2

          true–but do not wee need that land you refer to to grow crops? Or it is desert etc? I do not know, just thinking out loud.

          • wisefool

            I’ve heard everyone on the planet could fit in Rhode Island. As of now there is more than enough room not only to feed everyone, but to house them while feeding them. The system is designed to keep people slaves to it. I think crammed cities are a symptom of this.

        • Eisenkreutz

          Thats a plank in the Communist Manifesto Michael.

        • Gay Veteran

          Michael: didn’t you write on one of your blogs that there simply won’t be enough jobs in the future?

          • Michael

            There will not be enough jobs. But it won’t be because there are too many people. It will be because our economic system is fundamentally flawed.

            Michael

    • Louise in MO

      GARY2

      On Michael’s blog “The Economic Collapse” I have often thought you are rather zany. Reading this comment here convinces me you are simply insane.

      I lived in Southern California and went to Disneyland numverous times. I NEVER thought that it would be more fun if half the people weren’t there. Ditto at the beaches.

      I suggest that you make an appointment with a very good psychiatrist!

      • Gary2

        so then that means you enjoyed waiting in lines and all the traffic??and you think I am zany???really?

      • Gay Veteran

        Michael: “There will not be enough jobs. But it won’t be because there are too many people. It will be because our economic system is fundamentally flawed.”

        and when the population increases what are people to do?!?!?!?

    • Gay Veteran

      China’s population would be even higher if not for the government basically using force to hold down population growth.

      • Mal R

        There’d also be alot more Jews, homosexuals, gypsies, Ukranians, Cambodians, Sudanians(?) and a plethora of other minorities if various dictators hadn’t insisted on killing them off.

        What’s your point – that you’re a fan of govt murder?

        • Gay Veteran

          still have problems reading, eh?

          I did NOT advocate for China’s policies

          • Malcolm Reynolds

            Sure sounded like you approved.

        • Gary2

          a lot is two words NOT one word.

    • Modern Patriot

      Gary, you really are a nut job aren’t you. If there weren’t so many people like you who are all to happy to pile in on top of each other in all the cities then you wouldn’t have all the crowding you refer to. How is it that people like you live in these cities jammed in with millions of other people and yet you can’t stand being around them? Stupidity? That’s the only likely answer that seems feasible. I agree with tez’s comment, why don’t you lead the way comrade?

  • an apple a day

    The toxic food ingredients with no warning label is part of their evil plan. Hopefully California passes prop 37 and there will be a label warning of GMO.

  • Pingback: The Population Control Agenda Of The Radical Humanists Who Would Love For You And I To Die | _

  • Dave Webb

    My problem is I think there is an agenda as described in this article. I think GMO foods are just one part of a whole plan to reduce population by sterilizing the population. Genetically Modified Foods may cause the sterilization that this group is after. The goal is to introduce it into the entire planet’s food system. The only way to avoid this problem is not to eat the GMO foods. If the foods are not labeled then the foods will be in your pantry whether you want it or not. And there lies the real problem.
    So if we catch these people doing this crime against all of humanity what do we do with them?
    I would be looking for the motivation behind the “crime” as well.
    If I was to write a science fiction novel about what I think is going on, it would be difficult to get it published. If I wanted to eliminate humanity and take over this little life paradise we have here how would you do it?
    Here is my list:
    1. Famine. Disrupt the food supply.
    2. Sickness. Plant sickness in the population so they die. Do this with a vaccine.
    3. War. Start wars all over the planet to eliminate as many people as possible. This might be the chinese solution to their population problems. Create human waves of people to throw against their enemies. (This happened in Korea in the 50s. Machine guns burned up trying to contain these human waves of people. We finally stopped it at the 38th parallel.)
    4. Drought. Cause a crises that dries up the natural planet wide life cycle. This works with Famine.
    5. Invent a veneral disease that will spread like wildfire amongst a population. Do it with a vaccine. This actually happened. In the 50s, polio vaccine in New York City was produced from a small group of monkeys that were immune to AIDS. An entire group of people were “immunized” with this polio vaccine. Pretty soon you had a city wide epidemic of AIDS in one group of people. This group spread it to many innocent families through the prostitute system. It spread to Africa where it is a deadly disease decimating entire groups.
    6. Introduce GMO Foods. Somewhere down the road these foods will sterilize those that eat them. Not right away. Just gradually over the next 30 years until the population growth reverses.
    7. Introduce abortion. This sterilizes entire groups of young people. Reduces population by huge numbers.
    8. Introduce birth control pills. Then watch as people wait for a convenient time to have babies. Only by that time, they cannot have any babies.
    9. Make it convenient not to get married at all. This reduces children by not having a social structure to encourage them.
    If I were interested in eliminating mankind totally from the planet, that is how I would do it. Any of this sound familiar?

    • LOL

      GMO fear-mongering is part of the cultural-marxist anti-progress agenda, just as much as this fake ecologism (really anti-western civilization and industrialism) is.

  • Mordred

    This is paranoid conspiracy theory of the highest order, and logic fails on so many levels. First of all, if there were a SuperSecret ™ global conspiracy to do this, you wouldn’t know about it. A supercompetent organization of the type this plan implies would not go around leaking their plans to the general public through things like the Georgia Guidestones or the murals on the wall of the Denver International Airport. You wouldn’t know about it.

    Secondly, what would possibly be the motivation here? Money drives the world and a reduction of the global population of the order of magnitude you’re describing would basically bring commerce to a halt, and so it wouldn’t benefit the very organizations you are citing as responsible for this “plan.”

    • Eisenkreutz

      Shut up you moron. Its right in front of your face. Go study some economics. Learn to read books and behave.

      • Mordred

        Right. I’m sure every legit economist is just right onto this theory.

        • Eisenkreutz

          THE KEYNESIAN ECONOMISTS HAVE NEVER BEEN RIGHT ABOUT ANYTHING. THE AUSTRIANS HAVE HAD EVERY ONE OF THEIR PREDICTIONS PROVEN CORRECT. “LEGIT ECONOMIST”. YOU KNUCKLEHEAD.

          • Mordred

            ROTFL! Where did I ever specify the stripe of economist? I merely evoked “economists” in the general.

            Of whatever school of thought, where are the legit economists that buy into this conspiracy theory?

    • wisefool

      That reasoning is actually a logical fallacy. You cannot claim if something was done in secret – “you wouldn’t know about it”. In other words a supersecret global conspiracy would be IMPOSSIBLE to uncover, despite any investigation, loose lips, whitle blowers, etc. You are just finding reasons to keep drinking government kool-aid. Your religion is humanism, and you will preserve it at all cost.

      • Brian M.

        Humans are fallible and we make mistakes. A super-secret conspiracy WILL be uncovered one way or another, by a group error, slip-up, leak from inside, or enough snooping.

  • Dave Webb

    It is only paranoid if the facts do not support it.
    The motive would be to take over the planet. Exactly who would take over the planet remains to be seen.
    I think it is being done in plain sight. The idea is no one would ever believe it could happen. The best place to hide something is in the middle of a room in plain sight.
    Just like so many things that people will not believe. We didn’t used to believe in TVs. The idea that someone could transmit a signal and have an image and sound in your own home was impossible for most people to believe at one time.
    In 1955 if one talked about half the technology out there today, no one would believe you. You would be just one more nut case.
    With that in mind, the valid observations of UFOs are unbelievable.
    Atomic Bombs were stories in science fiction until one exploded in Japan.
    Or photos of a man-like upright ape in the California forests north of San Francisco. It could not be possibly true. How could they possibly be there with all our modern cameras and equipment? You step 100 yards off some roads in Northern California and you may never find your way back to civilization. We are not so secure in our knowledge of the strange to know what we are talking about.
    Or a fish in the South Atlantic or Indian Oceans supposedly extinct for several million years. The world is far more strange than we ever give it credit for.
    The platypus from Australia is an animal that makes my point. It was a proven hoax until someone brought a live one back from Australia. No such critter should be able to exist. A duck billed mammal that lays eggs? Really don’t blame them for declaring it a hoax.

  • LOL

    When the west tries to apply that philosophy on China, the response may be devastating, all these mad eco cows gets a taste of their own milk.

  • Eisenkreutz

    Seriously Michael? What kind of pretentious, silly article is this? The core crisis facing humanity today IS that there are way too many people living on this planet. OF COURSE overpopulation is the root cause of our all our economic, social, political, and environmental problems. THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH RESOURCES TO GO AROUND AND THE USELESS EATERS (THE 99%) ARE GOOD FOR NOTHING BUT CAUSING POLLUTION, SUBURBAN SPRAWL, AND A TAX BURDEN. IT IS BECAUSE OF PUBLIC STUPIDITY THAT NOTHING EVER GETS DONE ABOUT THE CENTRAL BANKING, FREE TRADE, AND FASCISM THAT IS PLAGUING US. PUBLIC STUPIDITY IS THE ACHILLES HEEL OF DEMOCRACY. WE MUST FIND INNOVATIVE WAYS OF KILLING OFF THE POPULATION AND RETURNING THE EARTH TO HARMONY.

    • Jack Bauer

      According to the international laws, what you have written is pure genocide and crime against humanity to wipe off people — criminal court would deal with your case if you speak out publicly. In other terms, Nazist and freak.

      • Eisenkreutz

        YOU NIMROD. YOU MORON. YOU STUPID JACKASS. INTERNATIONAL LAW? OBAMA HAND-PICKED HIS SCIENCE CZAR, JOHN HOLDREN, A MAN WHO OPINED THAT IT IS CONSTITUTIONAL TO PUT STERILANTS IN THE DRINKING WATER AND CONDUCT FORCED ABORTIONS IN AMERICA, TO IMPLEMENT POPULATION CONTROL. WHY DO YOU THINK THE MEDIA IS COVERING UP THE STUDY ON GMO FOOD TOXICITY? WHY DO YOU THINK WALL STREET FINANCED HITLER? WHY HAS NATO AND THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FAILED TO PREVENT EVERY SINGLE GENOCIDE THAT HAS OCCURED SINCE WW1? WHY DO YOU THINK THE GOVERNMENTS LIED ABOUT FUKASHIMA RADIATION LEVELS IN FOOD? WHY DO YOU THINK THEY ARE LEADING US TO WAR WITH LIES AND PROPAGANDA RIGHT NOW? DONT YOU UNDERSTAND, IDIOT, THAT IT IS THE WORLD GOVERNMENTS WHO HAVE ALWAYS AND WHO CONTINUE TO SPONSER GENOCIDE AND POPULATION CONTROL AND THE HAGUE EXISTS TO BRAINWASH THE FEEBLE-MINDED LIKE YOU INTO THINKING THAT YOU HAVE A RECOURSE? READ SUTTON.

        “CRIMINAL COURT” WOULD DEAL WITH MY “CASE” IF I “SPOKE PUBLICLY”? WE HAVE FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THIS COUNTRY, UNLIKE OTHER INFERIOR NATION-STATES, TO PROTECT US FROM PEOPLE LIKE YOU.

    • Uh-huh

      It is not overpopulation, it is the insane overuse of a huge portion of the natural resources by a small percentage of the world’s population.

      It is things like overfishing and then throwing hundreds of thousands of pounds of fish away because…oops, not the right fish. It is the insanity of destroying thousands of small farmers and biodiversity and creating Frankenmonsters. It is from using nonrenewable, polluting sources. It is from pooping right into the rivers and thinking chemicals will somehow make it disappear — can’t see it, must not be there, right? It is the chemtrails trying to change the weather. It is dropping a big glop of Corexit into the gulf and altering the North Atlantic current.

      Could Tesla’s ideas have saved the planet? We will never know because the corporate and government evil that abounded during that time period (and which still abounds) refuses to release the information (which they confiscated immediately upon his death) because it was admitted at that time that there were no way to meter his energy and no profit could be made.

      So my question to you: Would you murder the innocent to save yourself?

      The end times are definitely fascinating from the point of view on how low humans will sink to save themselves from themselves.

      Just be patient and the Earth herself will kill you because you won’t stop messing with her.

      • Eisenkreutz

        I never heard of Corexit before, thank you for informing me. To which invention of Tesla are you referring?

        The 1% doesnt overuse the resources, only concentrates the currency. The 99% wastes resources with our yuppie consumer culture, and this is the behavior which must be corrected in order to achieve sustainability.

        No one is talking about murder except the government which is buying 1.6 billion rounds of hollow-point ammunition and millions of coffins and writing the Mass Fatalities bill and the NDAA Act to use on the American people during the collapse. The collapse is going to kill off millions because that is what the Fed was designed to do. Read “The Politics of Money” by Gregory Mannarino. There are no innocents. We have all abused Gia and deserve our punishment. What makes you think Im going to save myself? Only Jesus can do that.

    • Louise in MO

      Eisenkrantz

      “We must find innovative ways to kll off humanity and restore the earth to harmony.”

      Will YOU be the first to step up and volunteer to be killed and help restore the earth to harmony? How about your family…..which ones would you like to see killed?

      You are a real nutcase and to think you are out there somewhere in an unsuspecting society!

      • Eisenkreutz

        IM THE NUTCASE? I SHOULD VOLUNTEER TO BE KILLED? My dear plebian, I have a ranch and a cabin totally off the grid.I derive energy from wind and solar sources and grow my own food. I have a well. I use my shit to make methane and fertilizer. I use a solar cooker. I use a horse to move around the farm. When I have the money someday, Im going to buy a smart car. Although hispanic women are my forte, I always use birth control with them. Dont want 10 little mexicans running around, increasing the carbon footprint, you know. The point is I dont consume corporate garbage. What are you doing to help the cause?

        Youre right about one thing…society is quite unsuspecting…of their impending doom which has been planned 100% by the government, but completely supported, although unknowingly, by themselves.

        • Mal R

          “I dont consume corporate garbage. ”

          and yet, you sure as hell consume alot of corporate garbage.

          I derive energy from wind and solar sources
          I have a well
          I use a solar cooker
          Im going to buy a smart car

          I’m with Louise, you’re a fruitcake.

          • Eisenkreutz

            What the hell are you talking about? You dont even make sense.

          • Malcolm Reynolds

            Ya, it’s me that wasn’t making sense.

          • Gary2

            the word a lot is 2 words NOT one.

  • Graham

    Eisenkreutz:-

    Yes…
    We either need to get responsible with the shagging routine, or else stop reincarnating on this planet. I’ve definitely become a “useless eater” and it’s time to move on.

    However, since Gary2′s logic is proving so interesting, I’ve got into “useless reading” too. 5^ G2… you sometimes make sense. Vote Mitt and win a free holiday to Mars on a TR-3B! That’s “plasma drive” with nuclear cores.

    Don’t get it confused with an LCD down at Walmart! Whilst one is a rectangle, the other is a triangle. Both come in black (no racism intended).

    • Eisenkreutz

      Its not the shagging. Shagging is great. I love shagging. Its the pregnancy. In particular, the dirty women in third world countries. We should have sanctions on all third world countries and let the lack of food force them to lower the population size. Here at home, we should ban immigration and have a one-child policy. We also need to abolish social security, medicare, and medicaid to force people to not have children they cant afford.

      • Gay Veteran

        “In particular, the dirty women in third world countries.”

        bigot

        • Mal R

          On this, I’m with you. One the one hand he finds them dirty Mexicans good enough to shag, but just a little too subhuman to reproduce with.

          Perhaps he should change his name to eisenKRAUT.

          • Eisenkreutz

            Mexican women are the most perfect race of female ever created. God willed the conquistadors to conquer them so that they could be our playthings. Perfect hourglass figures, shiny black hair, they make you things like tacos and nachos, they want to cuddle with you in public. Whats not to like? The problem is that they like to shag too much, and produce too many damn Mexicans. Thats why we need population control.

        • Eisenkreutz

          Gay,

          Youre just mad I wont make out with you.

          • Gay Veteran

            no, because I have standards

  • JoF

    Notice those who are so in favor of killing off the population aren’t doing themselves in. Kill someone else is their motto!

    • Eisenkreutz

      Thats why Ted Turner has 4 kids.

      • jaxon64

        so does Gary2..that is 4 kids that he knows of….wonder which 3 he will have put to death in his population control agreement. He appears to be at least 3 above his allowance……..

  • Don Was

    There IS a need for human population control. Anyone who understands the process of Invasive Species (Introduced life forms that have 0% natural predators)will tell you that once and Invasive Species is in an ecosystem, that Species will turn into a literal plague devastating the ecosystem it infests, rendering natural resident life forms extinct. Like it or not, Homo Sapiens behavior and global effect is 100% identical to an Invasive Species. Humankind must be regulated in order to cease being a “plague species”. The PROBLEM with Population Control is that the decision of “Who will live” and “Who will die” is being determined by Psychopaths. The Psychopathic Elite have already instituted genocidal and sadistic methods of culling human life, It’s no accident that many affluent and famous individuals are Eugenicists. Even I do agree with SOME aspects of Eugenics (NOT allowing Psychopaths to breed and spread their DNA for example) a Psychopathic Eugenicist is capable of monstrous levels of genocide. A good Recent example is the movie 2012, where the Murderous Elite deliberately withheld doomsday info and saved themselves on “Arks” and allowed every other single person on earth to die a horrible death.

    • Mal R

      “The PROBLEM with Population Control is that the decision of “Who will live” and “Who will die” is being determined by Psychopaths.”

      Not to mention the psychopaths that believe in Eugenics and think we need population control in the first place.

      • Eisenkreutz

        OF COURSE WE NEED POPULATION CONTROL. ARE YOU BLIND?

      • Gay Veteran

        “Not to mention the psychopaths that believe in Eugenics and think we need population control in the first place.”

        eyeroll, did you read Michael’s article Global Food Reserves Have Reached Their Lowest Level In Almost 40 Years?

        “…“…The era of seemingly endless cheap food has come to an end. In future years, there simply will not be enough food for everyone on the globe. Some people are going to go hungry….”

        yeah, no need for population control

        • Malcolm Reynolds

          How much do we pay farmers NOT to grow food? nuff said. I recommend you off yourself if you want to control population.

          • Gay Veteran

            like American agriculture could feed anothe billion people

          • Kimberly Hartfield

            Grow food, not alcohol products!

  • Samy

    This whole depopulation movement is just an extension of the 3rd Reich’s eugenics program. I would only be in favor of this policy if the proponents would have to volunteer their entire blood lines for “disposal”. Read Jim Marrs book “The rise of the 4th Reich”. This has been over 1/2 century in the making.

    • Eisenkreutz

      The stupid people should die. Not the elites. Thats why its called eugenics, silly.

  • http://www.none ARIZONA

    WHEN the POLICE are flushing newborn children down the sewer who were born in jail,and the PEOPLE ALLOW IT,THE LORD JESUS WILL DESTROY them for it,america has become the cesspool of the world,and the sad thing is all the good CHRISTIANS think its OK,cause what they really want is for them and their family to be with their DADDY LUCIFER in hell…….and they’er going to get their wish this time………….

    • Mal R

      You’re foaming at the mouth about nonsense.

  • http://www.none ARIZONA

    ITS OK if you cencor my comments,but what you don’t understand is the day will come when you too will stand in front of the LORD JESUS and I’am sure you’ll have some funny thing to excuse your self,better make it good,his sence of humor ain’t the same as americas good christians……….

  • http://www.themessageofhiskingdom.com/PoisoningOfMankindCopperDeficiency.htm C.A. Bouthillier

    The current birth rate of the US is about 6.8. Death rate is over 14. We are decreasing in population; in fact we decreased by about 1.5 million in 2011. The real population numbers are 214 million — not 314 million.

    World population closer to 4 billion, not 7 billion.

    World population started increasing exponentially beginning in the 1500′s.
    This was due to increasing birth rate –caused by decreasing gestational period;
    due to mass iron poisoning & copper deficiency. Over the last few decades the final
    extermination phase has been in place. The United States was set up in the final
    stage in 2006.

    I encourage you to read: http://www.themessageofhiskingdom.com/PoisoningOfMankindCopperDeficiency.htm

    C.A. Bouthillier
    Researcher

    • Eisenkreutz

      You dont know what the hell youre talking about. Do you understand the difference between academia and reality? Probably not.

    • Gay Veteran

      “The real population numbers are 214 million — not 314 million.”

      wow, someone better inform the Census Bureau, ROFLOL

  • Washington

    Published on Aug 23, 2012 by invisiblerme William Binney is among a group of N.S.A. whistle-blowers, including Thomas A. Drake, who have each risked everything — their freedom, livelihoods and personal relationships — to warn Americans about the dangers of N.S.A. domestic spying; A top-secret program he says is broadly collecting Americans’ personal data.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OemwW60VxDY&feature=plcp

  • WarpLover

    Jesus said “be fruitful and multiply”.

    Anyone who is for REDUCING the population, is going against God’s plan.

    That is really all we need to know here.

    • Gay Veteran

      NATURE will control our numbers, just like every other species

      • Eisenkreutz

        Nature cant contain the numbers of an apex predator.

        • Gay Veteran

          apex predator starves when the species it feeds on decline, so yes nature WILL control us

    • Kimberly Hartfield

      You are so right! Mom of 8

  • Gay Veteran

    You don’t have to be a “radical humanist” to understand that in many countries there is indeed overpopulation. VOLUNTARY efforts to reduce the population are acceptable because we simply cannot continue on our present path. Cheap fertilizers (made from hydrocarbons) is one reason the population is at its current level, but soon those fertilizers will not be cheaply available.

    • Mal R

      “You don’t have to be a “radical humanist” to understand that in many countries there is indeed overpopulation”

      No there isn’t any such thing. More likely those countries are all suffering from oppressive, dictatorial govt that keeps them in poverty by socializing all the resources, which typically results in instantaneous shortages and complete lack of innovation and invention.

      • Gay Veteran

        your ignorance is truly staggering

        • Gary2

          Mal is borderline retarded. Do not waste time of this dolt.

        • Malcolm Reynolds

          Ya, what I said never happens.

          • Gary2

            for once you just said something true.

      • Gay Veteran

        from Michael’s newest article: “For six of the last eleven years the world has consumed more food than it has produced. This year, drought in the United States and elsewhere has put even more pressure on global food supplies than usual. As a result, global food reserves have reached their lowest level in almost 40 years. Experts are warning that if next summer is similar to this summer that it could be enough to trigger a major global food crisis. At this point, the world is literally living from one year to the next. There is simply not much of a buffer left.”

        so get a clue Malcolm

        • LOL

          Not because of overpopulation but because of the waste inherent to the current international plutocracy.

        • Malcolm Reynolds

          Oh I’ve got the clue. DipSh!ts like you are pining for eugenics and mass murder.

          • Gay Veteran

            bearing false witness YET AGAIN

    • Eisenkreutz

      Or you could just ban entitlements and let them starve to death. I loved it when the Ron Paul supporters cheered “let him die”.

  • david

    When I was in college, a grade-school friend of mine, a very bright guy, said to me with a straight face that he believed the proper population for the earth was about 100,000 people. Yes, you read that right. I was astounded. I said that was about the population of the county we were living in. He looked at me, as seriously as could be, nodded, and said “that’s right”.

    This guy is now a well-known ecologist at a major university in the Midwest, nearing the end of a long and distinguished career. His list of publications is longer than your arm. He MAY have upwardly revised his estimate for a proper population to the low 100 million figure you quoted, but I wouldn’t bet on it. But I WOULD bet that he hasn’t altered his basic belief. Scary. Scarier: How many others like him are out there?

    • Eisenkreutz

      Me

  • Jewel

    Aaaargh! Can’t modern “writers” bother to learn the language before attempting to pen an article? This one couldn’t even construct a proper title. It’s “you and me,” not “you and I.”

    Alas poor English, I knew ye well.

    • Eisenkreutz

      Are you sure about that? I dont think it matters.

    • signalfire1

      We were taught in the 1960s that it was ‘you and I’; they apparently changed this teaching recently. I don’t think it matters that much. The more recently ‘educated’ seem unable to know the difference between ‘there’, ‘their’ and
      ‘they’re’ which makes me think basic literacy has taken quite a hit.

      • Francesca Fiore

        Did it become ” you and me” ? In my Canadian English Schooling System, it was also taught as “you and I ” which might be product of the combined British and French influences.

  • JAH666

    There doesn’t need to be a conspiracy at the heart of population decline to have created the reduction in fertility rates worldwide. It is happening for many reasons and will continue to evolve throughout this century. The population of Japan is already exhibiting negative growth (that means that it is in real decline) now and other wetsern nations will be at that point soon.

    Read: How Civilizations Die (And Why Islam Is Dying Too) by David P. Goldman

    This book uses history and the logic of demography to explain fertility and population decline. Oh, and it has nothing to do with GMO foods or “something in the water” or chemtrails. The prime factors associated with population decline are: urbanization, education and literacy, and the modernization of traditional societies. I urge all to read Goldman’s book before jumping off the conspiracy cliff.

    • LOL

      Literacy/education/urbanization have failed to stifle muzzie growth.

      While westerners have become post-christian, muzzies have gone the exact opposite way and continues to have children.

      Even in the US, they are “radicalizing” (becoming more true to their religion).

  • Don Was

    Human Beings are inherently selfish. They want to do anything and everything without restraint and then are dumb enough to believe that there will never be a Price to pay. Only a complete jackass will deny that the World’s oceans are septic toilets. Edible Seafood is amazingly toxic and severely depleted to point of non existence by 2050. Countries such as India, where people breed in ridiculous amounts displacing other life forms.

    Population Control is not the only reason the Human Race must be regulated. Citizens of countries like the US stand idly by while Mega Corporations destroy the Gulf, Create more counter productive and polluting Nuke reactors, Food modified and destroyed by big agriculture such as Monsanto.

    The Elite want Population Control because it will be easier to control whoever is left. Those who deny the need for Population Control believe Humans can proliferate and pillage, continuing to use the Earth like a 2 dollar whore.

    The Human Experiment is an abyssal failure. Psychopaths are allowed by Non-Psychopaths to achieve power and dominance, where, the Psychopaths put in place murderous and destructive policies, which in turn are Enabled by Non-Pyschopaths, who in turn are manipulated by Psychopaths until their view of reality is “that there is no problem with anything”

    Homo Sapiens continue to push and prod until everything is annihilated, this is why the Good Lord put failsafes in place such as Super Volcanoes, Asteroids, Gamma Ray Bursts, so that a beleaguered planet can be “reset”. The Great Flood was one such reset. Unfortunately, Humankind does not have the ability to learn from past mistakes, and so commit the same stupid acts time and again. Throughout history, Civilization reaches an apex and collapses, in an endless cycle, all due to the process listed in the previous paragraph.

    Maybe none of us, Psychopathic or otherwise, will have to worry about population control. As always, it probably will be decided by a Force greater and definitely smarter than any of us.

    • LOL

      Oh the evil of nuclear reactors, oil companies and GMOs! SUVs, not gay rights caused Katrina, repent and give Al Gore his carbone credits!

      “Only a complete jackass will deny that the World’s oceans are septic toilets.”

      Haha, dumbass! There are some +1236 millions kilometers cube of sea water, +150 millions tons of water per human.

  • FerZ

    All life grows, declines, and expires; human or not. Your debate doesn’t mean very much, does it?

  • Eagle8

    If everyone who believes the earth is overcrowded would simply volunteer to remove themselves, I might believe they are sincere. Totally wrong, but at least sincere. Their real agenda is control of the world’s population by a self proclaimed elite.

    • http://twitter.com/kimjgoodwin kim desantis goodwin

      yes they want to kill us and save themselves.. They should donate their sick thoughts to their planet. Playing god making people suffer with illness from GMO disease and chemtrails. While they have enough money and resources to know what is healthy to eat or not, and underground living in case anything happens. These colleges like Harvard and Yale should get new teachers. These people were made with no soul… This whole thought process is sick..

  • Randall

    I wholehearteldly agree that the population of this planet is much too high. There seems to be two ways of dealing with this, increasing the death rate or decreasing the birth rate. When talking about population control, the subject always stirs emotional responses. What is really needed is a logical approach to the question of “which way will cause the least amount of suffering and will produce the desired results”? When one thinks of increasing the death rate horrid pictures come to mind such as nuclear strikes or home invasions to kill the elderly. These things could certaintly happen one day if history is a guide( the bombing of nagasaki and hiroshima and the holocaust). So what about lowering the birth rate? The way i see it, it is much easier to prevent a life than to take a life because if something does not exist it cannot suffer.

  • Werner von Braun

    The Earth is a sphere with finite resources and living space. Go to India or any other densely populated country, live in a major city for a couple of weeks, and then decide if you really oppose population control. I don’t, and I also do not have any children.

    Modern society have no use for unskilled labourers any more. Almost all production is automated, and the rest will be soon. Hard work will be a thing af the past, as it already is in many parts of the world. Hence, there is no longer any use for the surplus human population to till the soil, lift heavy things or pilot vehicles, as the machines can do that perfectly well by themselves save a little human supervision.

    The future will be produced and maintained by machines and a decreasing number of human specialists. The rest of the human race will be left to it’s own device on an individual basis. Better to reduce the number of idle eaters and breathers for the sake of the rest of what is left of nature, and the security of select, privileged human stewards of the Earth.

    Let the human race trancend, and take control of it’s own existence and evolution.

    Freedom and space to roam and play is by nature more abundant in a world with less individuals to share it with.

    If you do not wish to live in a world like ours, with human waste and destruction every where, you have to think in means and ends. Which end would you rather prefer? A long emergency like the present status quo, or a quick-but-nasty disaster as the means to an end? The end being – if not population reduction – at least a pleasant equilibrium of the human race with nature, Earth, our home.

    All I’m sayin’ is: don’t shit where you eat.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Chris-Porter/1008445686 Chris Porter

    there are too many logical fallacies in this article to even BEGIN to address them all. This is ridiculous

  • http://www.facebook.com/patrick.cawley.372 Patrick Cawley

    Ref: U.N. Agenda 21

  • Kimberly Hartfield

    Mom of 8 God says, Be fruitful and multiply!