Hezbollah In Mexico: The Truth About Islamic Terror On The U.S. Border

Posted by Admin | Posted in Illegal Immigration, National Security | Posted on 07-05-2011

16

While the Obama administration celebrates the death of Osama Bin Laden and our military forces are poking around in caves all over Afghanistan looking for members of al-Qaeda, a far more dangerous threat is growing right in our own backyard.  Hezbollah has established bases all over Mexico, Central America and South America.  Hezbollah is now heavily involved in the drug trade and in trafficking illegal aliens.  But do we hear about any of this in the news?  No, instead our government and our media are obsessed with al-Qaeda.  This is a fundamental mistake.  Hezbollah is far more organized and far more dangerous.

One local television news program recently interviewed a former U.S. intelligence agent who has spent many years tracking Hezbollah activities in Mexico.  The following are some quotes from that interview about Hezbollah....

*"They are recognized by many experts as the 'A' team of Muslim terrorist organizations."

*"We are looking at 15 or 20 years that Hezbollah has been setting up shop in Mexico."

*"they are the equals of Russians, Chinese or Cubans"

*"They're focusing on developing … infiltrating communities within North America."

Right now they are making a ton of money from selling drugs and trafficking illegal aliens, and they send that money back to Lebanon to fund the fight against Israel.  But someday the organization that Hezbollah has built up in Mexico will be used to fight against the United States.

The following is a video news report that contains the quotes you just read above....

So why doesn't the U.S. government do something about all this?

That is a very good question.

In our recent article entitled "The Truth About Securing The Border" we noted that the U.S. seems more than happy to help other nations secure their borders and yet refuses to secure our own....

Is there a reason why the U.S. government refuses to secure our border with Mexico?

After all, we seem more than happy to help other nations secure their borders.

In fact, U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has just agreed to help Saudi Arabia secure its dangerous border areas near Yemen.

Not only that, we have secured the border between South Korea and North Korea so well that not a single North Korean has crossed over the border illegally in over 50 years.

And yet we continue to leave our border with Mexico completely wide open.

Not only is doing so insanely bad public policy, it also greatly endangers our national security.

Border officials tell us that a growing number of radical Muslims are sneaking over the Mexican border into the United States.

And we are doing almost nothing to stop them.

Our government likes to pretend that they are serious about national security, but the truth is that they are asleep at the switch.

Illegal immigration is rampant and our border is wide open.

In fact, our border with Mexico is now being called "the most dangerous place on earth".

Someday our lack of border security and our tolerance of Hezbollah in Mexico is really going to bit us on our backsides.

So what do all of you think about this?  Feel free to leave a comment with your thoughts below....

Mania And The Economic Meltdown of Society

Posted by Admin | Posted in Economy | Posted on 20-03-2011

1

Mania and the Economic Meltdown of Society

by Barnabe Geisweiller

During a period of the Dutch Golden Age prices of tulip bulbs reached extraordinary levels. Single tulip bulbs were bought and sold for small fortunes, making some very wealthy. It is widely considered the world’s first speculative bubble and, like all bubbles, it suddenly collapsed. The period is popularly referred to as “tulip mania.”

There have been numerous manias since the tulip craze of the 17th century. Recent bubbles include the dot-com bubble and many real estate bubbles around the world. In bubbles products and assets trade at considerably inflated values compared to their intrinsic ones.

Today, we are at the end of a period of wealth and excess like the Roaring Twenties. This time it is the value of money itself that has been distorted, and the pursuit and concentration of wealth without a relative productive merit to society that has reached the point of mania.

We have come to this point because of corporations and financial markets without integrity, and a government subordinate to these engines of speculation, manipulation and corruption with an unchecked power of capital accumulation.

The Founding Fathers granted Congress the authority to coin money and regulate its value, and Thomas Jefferson was deeply mistrustful of private banks and fiat currency. One wonders what Jefferson would say now, as the Federal Reserve, a privately owned bank that controls the money supply of the United States, debases the currency and fuels inflation.

The recent rally in the markets was not based on economic recovery but rather on fiscal stimulus. Money rolling off printing presses and ultra-low interest rates have distorted the value of money, and forced investors seeking higher yields from bonds into equities. All this cheap money encourages malinvestments that will harm the economy when they go bust.

The excess liquidity created in large part by the Fed’s rounds of quantitative easing helped cause inflation to surge worldwide. Food riots became full-blown revolutions and the price of oil soared, pushing the prices of goods up even further.

Many were duped before the financial crisis by the media buffoons who cheered as the treasuries of banks and firms swelled to sizes unseen before. They used their television and radio programs to convince the public that they too could be rich, that it was as easy as signing an adjustable-rate mortgage, and that there was no end in sight to this bull market.

We would have been wiser to recall words often attributed to Abraham Lincoln when he purportedly wrote that “corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money powers of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until the wealth is aggregated in the hands of a few, and the Republic is destroyed.”

In 2011 as corporations once again post record profits, the cheerleaders are back. For these courtiers who parrot official propaganda, corporate profits are the only economic indicator worth looking at.

After our last flirtation with total economic meltdown those we elected on populist platforms bailed out the ruling class of this kleptocracy. The impoverished throngs clamored for heads. Then the outrage slowly dissipated, and many people were left to scoff at the corporate bonuses printed in newspapers read in the waiting rooms of unemployment offices. Meanwhile, “too big to fail” only got bigger.

We should have learned that these bloated, heartless entities were not benevolent creatures. Instead, we accepted as truth the lie that we could not survive without them. So we continued to feed them, and consumption became a patriotic duty. As the German writer Johann Wolfgan von Goethe, born 1794, put it, “None are more helplessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.”

Government is largely to blame for our servility. It gives free rein to mega corporations that lobby Capitol Hill and offer campaign contributions, placing corporate interests above public ones. Like Bernie Madoff, it promises impossible returns. It runs its Ponzi scheme Social Security—which will run a $45 billion deficit this year according to the Congressional Budget Office—taxing younger generations for the entitlements promised earlier to others. It embodies fiscal irresponsibility running historic debts and deficits, and citizens are encouraged to spend beyond their means. This government is not the “wise and frugal government” envisioned by Thomas Jefferson.

It was those entrusted with protecting the public who allowed financial institutions to regulate themselves. These institutions traded and insured each other’s toxic assets. Ordinary people are to blame too for being fooled into believing they were richer than was ever possible. Those who warned about the dangers of derivatives such as Brooksley Born, former chairperson of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, were quickly silenced. Those who championed deregulation such as Alan Greenspan, former Chairman of the Federal Reserve, were our mania’s rock stars.

When a meltdown became imminent, Wall Street turned to the government. The most capitalist country in the world suddenly became more socialist, forgot all about moral hazard and nationalized failing companies. The Fed turned on its printing press, buoyed corporate profits, and now we will need to tackle inflation combined with economic stagnation.

Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, feels you cannot have destabilizing inflation—an increase in the money supply causing prices to rise—with a high rate of unemployment. The same reasoning kept monetary policy loose during the 1970s when oil prices soared on Middle East turmoil. The cost of food and fuel rose, the economy stagnated and the dollar depreciated. But even when it bears so many similarities to the present, why learn from the past?

What will happen in the United States when its loose monetary policy becomes untenable? The overall public debt of the United States is over $14 trillion—nearly 100% of GDP—and since foreigners hold much of that debt the interest payments are leaving the country; unlike in Japan where payments are made to its own citizens. As the debt increases, interest rates will rise and payments will swell.

Municipal and state governments are broke, pushing combined government indebtedness to levels unseen since the end of World War II. Repayment of debt was made easier after World War II by a booming labor force, an abundance of natural resources, a growing manufacturing sector, high personal savings and demand for consumer goods. This is not the case now.

Those with employment may not feel the situation is so dire unless they scrutinize economic data when it is released. The confusion is unsurprising given the habit of many commentators and news organizations of focusing on the more optimistic numbers of usually mixed financial data.

In order to have a more accurate gauge of the current economic climate people would need to read through the headlines. Consumer spending rises! (But consumer sentiment fell in March at the fastest pace since the financial crisis began; jobless claims rose in the first week of March; and Americans are once again turning to credit.) Unemployment is down! (Because many have given up on finding work altogether; the labor participation rate is at its lowest since the early 1980s, and the real unemployment rate, removing statistical distortions and adding long-term discouraged workers, stands at around 22%.) Corporate profits are up! (Home prices are falling, foreclosures are mounting and inflation is rising.)

Recently the U.S. trade deficit jumped 15%, and to buy all this imported stuff American consumers are relying more on credit as shown in the Fed’s Consumer Credit Report. The U.S. budget deficit for February hit an all-time record of $223 billion, the largest monthly deficit in U.S. history. The deficit for the first five months of fiscal year 2011 was a whopping $642 billion. As the Republicans and Democrats fight over the budget it is clear the government has no plan on how to manage its entitlement spending, especially as the population ages and health care costs mount.

The truth Americans will come to realize is that the “recovery” was never as surefooted as some made it out to be, and that the situation is quite dire. Big cuts in government spending at this point will likely drag down a fragile economy which is not self-sustaining; to continue this kind of spending (or to roll over its debt) the U.S. will need to borrow more and lenders will demand higher interest rates that will increase the borrowing costs of the government; if interest rates do not rise the Fed and central banks could be the only buyers of U.S. Treasuries and, as the U.S. monetizes its debt, exported inflation and the social unrest it fuels will punish the economy while the dollar collapses.

The billionaire real estate magnate Sam Zell recently warned that Americans should be prepared for a 25% reduction in their standard of living when the U.S. dollar loses its status as the world’s reserve currency. Already France, Russia, China and others are moving away from the dollar, proposing that commercial exchanges be done in other currencies.

PIMCO, the world's largest bond fund, recently announced it has dropped all of its U.S. Treasuries. The Fed has been buying 70% of Treasuries issued, and many wonder who will fill that buying demand when the Fed’s quantitative easing program ends. Muni bonds can no longer be considered safe as the threat of defaults looms.

The Eurozone with Greece, Ireland, Spain and Portugal is in dire straits as well. The United States has not been alone in running its printing press while accumulating debt. But it helped set the pace. The United States is the lynchpin of this global economy, so it is likely the death knell will sound here. It is a matter of time before the young, educated and restless, forced to face the fact that their generation will be the first to experience a lower standard of living than the previous generation, will form riotous crowds on the streets of America.

It will start with a nasty bout of stagflation. That word will become vernacular. Then may come the double-dip recession. A meltdown, when it happens, will come quickly because such is the nature of panic. Those left with the means will run to gold and silver, time-tested stores of wealth. This too will reach the point of mania, and bubbles will fizzle in champagne flutes for a few, until that one bursts too.

But this bubble—our mania—is truly one for the ages.

The Truth About Texting

Posted by Admin | Posted in Stupidity, Technology | Posted on 13-02-2011

0

A Beautiful World Without Empathy: Exhibit A Texting

Texting

So I’m sitting in an average size living room watching a couple of people texting each other rather than carry on a conversation. Isn’t that weird?

Apparently it’s becoming common practice. Texting is everywhere.

Why is it that a growing number of people prefer to text rather than converse, or to make phone calls, or to even leave voice messages?

And why is it that ever since texting has become the preferred one-way method of distance communications (anything beyond 2 feet), no one but old fashioned fools bother to directly answer their phones anymore?

Well I had a hunch but I decided to do a little internet research concerning texting vs. talk. The many comments I read confirmed my suspicions.

Here are some of the top reasons people prefer to text:
"It's more straight and to the point.”
“I can ignore or respond at my own leisure.”
“It is so much more easily accomplished through a few words of text without all the niceties and formalities of a phone call!”
“Texting is direct, to the point without the small talk involved in phone conversation.”
“I hate talking on the phone.”
“I know some people who keep me on the phone way longer that I'd like.”
“If I don't have time to have a full attentive conversation, I have to text.”
“It’s so easy to flirt and exchange small bits of banter. It's playful and possible that someone might find it easier to text risqué thoughts than saying it face to face or on the phone.”
“It's just convenient and quick.”
“I can keep in touch with people who I don't see often but don't want to call.”
“The only con for me with the texting is sarcasm gets taken for seriousness and it offends people. Soooo I gotta watch what I text”
So basically what we have here is a deliberate failure to communicate beyond one-way messages.
“When I text, I just want to bark or whisper my message. I want to make you laugh or smile, but I don’t want to get into anything complex or time consuming. I don’t want to listen to you at least not right now. I want to share something quick, easy, and right at my finger tips.”
I think that what has separated the human race from the animal world is, for one thing, conversation. Ok, and perhaps typing too. But animals call, bark, or scream messages to each other. Animals don’t converse and texting isn’t conversation either. Even IM is a type of conversation because the response time is usually fairly immediate, but some folks take eons to respond to a text. Some don’t even bother to respond.
The irony is that texting is a more primitive form of communication with the aid of a more sophisticated tool. And some very sophisticated tools (phones) will tell on you if you don’t respond soon after you’ve read a message.
So the next time you think about texting remember the subtext your are sending. Consider the inevitable trajectory of this type of communication.
“It’s all about me. That’s what it’s really all about. Me, me, me and what I want when I want it and I really am not interested in what you want when you want it. God forbid that I would have to perform niceties and endure formalities for your sake!
If I called you I’d have to listen to you because you would introduce into the conversation something you wanted to talk about. I just don’t have time for that. Life is too short and I’ve got a really cute Avatar sweetie in Second Life that will do exactly what I want when I want it. And I don’t need to sweet talk or small talk my honey Avatar. So just text me back when you have a chance and it better be important because I’ve got a life! Really I do.”

Please visit Faultline USA for more great articles like this.

The Truth About Government Debt

Posted by Admin | Posted in Economy, Enviromental, Politics | Posted on 02-02-2011

0

Free Money

by Tucker Scofield

An acquaintance of mine had an opportunity this week to make as much as $25,000.00…she turned it down.

She is a property owner on the Gulf and she received a phone call from a friend regarding BP. They are settling damage claims with anyone who may have been affected by last summer’s oil spill and the caller, who knew others affected by the spill, was passing along the fact that the money was available and ripe for the picking.

There it was…free money. Was BP really going to audit every claim before paying it out of their $20 billion slush fund? Not in a million years. All she would’ve had to do was exaggerate the facts, maybe tell a little white lie or two and POOF, the Oil Fairy would grant a wish that could make the struggles of the past two years disappear. One small bit of paperwork and it would be dead presidents raining down from Heaven! Get that money, dollar-dollar bill, y’all!  But she wouldn’t do it. For her, this was a matter of principle.

I asked why she turned it down. “It’s not right,” she said. She didn’t feel as though she’d been negatively affected by the spill at all, despite having received numerous phone calls from concerned renters regarding conditions on the beach. Her rental income was pretty much unchanged from the previous year and she felt as though filing a claim would have been fraudulent.

Not too many people could have turned down such a temptation. Right or wrong, money talks and everything else walks, at least for most. Obviously, our politicians are very aware of this and use their powers to pass various entitlement programs – “free money” – in return for votes. For the moment, put aside your opinions regarding the necessity of such programs and focus instead on this: A large percentage of our population now depends, to some degree, upon entitlement programs and the money to fund those programs is rapidly disappearing. The recipients of entitlement programs don’t want the free money to stop so they continue to vote for the whores – sorry, I meant to say politicians – who gave it to them in the first place. That is, of course, unless someone else promises them more free money.

Margaret Thatcher was right – eventually, you run out of other people’s money, and that is precisely the position in which we now find ourselves. So how do we escape this death spiral of ever-increasing entitlement programs?

Fiscal responsibility. Somebody – or more accurately, a group of somebodies – has to grab a clue, wake the hell up, and smell what the dog just plopped down...we are in trouble and our current path is unsustainable! Any other assessment is just pure and total nonsense. The electorate recognized this and made a statement, loud and clear, on November 2nd; fiscal responsibility is the mandate given the 112th Congress and I’m relieved to see them following through, at least for the moment.

In your personal household you have two options when faced with “deficit spending” (spending more than you make, as with running up your credit cards) and/or budget crunches (not having enough money to pay the bills): You either make radical adjustments to your lifestyle by curtailing most of your activities and watching every single penny, or you file bankruptcy. You cannot bring your budget under control by spending your way out of it, and borrowing only delays and exacerbates inevitable financial collapse.

Since filing bankruptcy is not a national option, our only recourse is to buckle down and make the hard choices necessary to save our country. That means cutting spending with a chain saw and ridding ourselves of many of these entitlements.  It won’t be fun and it’ll make a lot of people mad but that’s just the way it needs to be.

Oh sure, there will be those who blame conservatives for being a bunch of racist bigots who believe that entitlement recipients are lazy and they just need to get a job. Whatever. I hate entitlement programs, I really do. And frankly, I can’t stand the bleeding hearts that continually whine in their support. But it may shock you as to why I hate them.

Entitlement programs, in my opinion, reduce human beings to little more than government pets. Like a dog eagerly snatching up whatever crumbs may fall from the table, recipients of entitlements surrender control over their own destiny and become subservient to the system established to “help” them. The acceptance of entitlements robs the individual of a chance at exceptionalism and turns them into slaves of the system. Think I’m being unreasonable?

Riddle me this, Batman: Cite me just one success story out of the millions of success stories this country has incubated since our inception in which a person has succeeded without countless trials and tribulations. I’ll wait. Thought of any? You won’t, either. It is the trials that tempered the individual’s desire to succeed; without the trials, there IS NO SUCCESS STORY.

Entitlements blunt the pain of trials; recipients accept mediocrity and are never forced to find the best in themselves. Right now, the ghettos, the housing projects, and the trailer parks are filled with potential Oprah Winfrey’s and Warren Buffetts who will instead remain John and Jane Does because they are receiving just enough to prevent them from channeling their exceptional potential. And that’s a damned shame.

Turn off the free money. Obviously it can’t be done overnight but create a deadline and then stick to it. Let people feel the pain, let them discover their own potential, let them recover their dignity. It’ll be good for the country but it’ll be better for the individual.

And that “acquaintance” who chose not to file the claim with BP? That was my wife. I’m proud of her.

Tucker Scofield’s writing is shaped by his extensive business travels in the manufacturing sector. He is also a musician, a daddy, and a husband. His articles appear weekly at www.TheDCPost.com.
--
Tucker Scofield

Contributing Author
The DC Post



How the US Government Manipulates Inflation Data

Posted by Admin | Posted in Economy | Posted on 02-02-2011

0

How the US Government Manipulates Inflation Data

An eye-opening guest post by Phil of Phil's Stock World

The PCE bothered me yesterday.

The Government told us that the PCE core price index for December was 0% - no inflation at all.  I found that to be incredible - as in not credible at all and then Tusked asked me how long the Bernank could keep justifying his rampant money printing with fake government data, to which I responded: "I had many derogatory things to say about that but I was literally so sickened by that BS that I couldn’t bring myself to comment on it so I just left it alone but it’s a very sad joke that our government can tell us that there was no inflation in December while the whole planet is falling apart, isn’t it?"

Fortunately, there was a helpful article in the WSJ by Brett Arends that pointed out that the way the government justifies their low inflation figures is through "substitution and harmonics," a topic expert Government BS detector, Barry Ritholtz had touched on as well.  As Barry says:

Harmonics asks the question: "How much of a product's price increase is a function of "inflation," and how much is quality improvement?" Thus, the entire late 1990's concept of Hedonics is premised upon a flawed assumption: that quality is static. Hedonics is a variation of the old trick of comparing the present with the past, instead of the present. Measuring quality improvements is a distraction from the real measure of inflation: the purchasing power of a dollar.

Hedonics opens the door to producing magical results: a lower inflation rate with generally rising prices, a higher growth rate although the economy may be weaker, and a higher productivity number, although productivity would have been declining without the Donica imputations.

What BS, right?  Well, when I get mad, I do research and when my research uncovers something - I make an electronic puppet show:

Forward this to your friends and Congresspeople - let's try to get our government to get real!

Video here.

Chart by ShadowStats.com, http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/inflation-charts

Saving a Doomed Dollar: Plans B, C, D, and E

Posted by Admin | Posted in Economy | Posted on 20-01-2011

0

Reuters’ Emily Flitter asks in a recent column What is Plan B if China dumps its U.S. debt?

It is worth asking about U.S. officials’ Plan B just in case one day relations take a surprise turn for the worse and Beijing dumps its holdings of U.S. treasuries.

China is officially the United States’ biggest foreign creditor, with roughly $900 billion in Treasury holdings — or over $1 trillion with Hong Kong’s holdings included.

That means it could do severe damage to U.S. debt markets if it suddenly started selling large amounts.

This is not a “just in case” scenario. China has already been taking steps to curb their US Treasury purchases, lowering their U.S. debt holdings from $929 billion to $896 billion between November of 2009 and 2010 (Hong Kong’s year over year holdings are down as well). Chinese President Hu Jintao made it clear where the Chinese stand with regards to the US dollar of the future calling the current dollar-led global monetary system a “product of the past.” While this may not necessarily mean the Chinese will one day, all of a sudden, halt all purchases of US debt, it is certainly reason for concern to those hoping to maintain a strong and stable U.S. currency. Our major foreign creditor is reducing their exposure - that means something, or at least it should. The US dollar, as it has for the last 100 years, will continue to weaken over time compared to other major currencies, and our dollars will buy fewer and fewer goods as a result. The nation’s fiscal problems will see to it that the depreciation of the dollar accelerates over time.

The slow collapse of the dollar, in our view, would be the best-case scenario, but there is still the very real possibility that China completely pulls the plug and kills the patient. Ms. Flitter writes:

To be sure, the idea that China would suddenly sell its U.S. debt holdings is almost unimaginable to some.

After all, any weakening in the U.S. debt markets and the resulting global markets turmoil, including likely weakness in the dollar, would bounce back on China and could hurt its economy badly, especially as the United States is such a huge Chinese export market.

It is only unimaginable to some because they don’t believe it can happen here. But it can happen here - it must. The lead stories during this economic recession/depression have been about real estate, jobs, and GDP. The real story is none of those. Although it has yet to become the mainstream talking point , the real crisis facing America is a sovereign debt crisis. We have too much debt, and that’s going to get cleared out of the system one way or the other.

Any number of reasons, some of which Ms. Flitter mentions in her article, could be used as justification by China to stop the purchase of U.S. debt. Trade and resource disputes, Taiwan, or the final push to bring America to it’s knees. Sure, the Chinese economy and its people will hurt for a few years, but it would be a small price to pay by a communist Chinese government to see the world’s major super power be marginalized or perhaps even completely obliterated.

Make no mistake. The Chinese are at war. These events are not simple one or two dimensional short-term manipulations. The playing field is a grand chessboard and the Chinese have been positioning their pieces for decades. An attack on the King is imminent.

Ms. Flitter suggests several plans (packaging them into what she refers to as ‘Plan B’) to deal with the attack once it begins and be assured it will. You can be certain of it.

In an earlier report we detailed that the Pentagon and Military are Actively War Gaming ‘Large Scale Economic Breakdown’ and ‘Civil Unrest’ scenarios, going so far as to send military specialists to the floors of our stock exchanges to learn more about how a financial attack on our system would occur and to develop response plans if and when it does.

Plan B

Banks could be called on to increase their holdings of treasuries, and as a last resort, the Federal Reserve could also be called on to fill the gap, though this could risk turning any dollar weakness into a slump.

Plan B is already in effect, as evidenced by the monetization of US debt by the Federal Reserve. It started in 2008 and continues to this day, with the most recent round being some $600 billion dollars (officially). In case you haven’t heard, the privately held (by major banking institutions) Federal Reserve is the largest buyer of US debt, having surpassed China as of November 2010.

Given that we have been engaging in Quantitative Easing for quite some time, and the US dollar continues to lose strength and status, we suggest that Plan B has already failed.

Plan C

In 2009, economist Brad Setser suggested the United States could establish emergency currency swap lines with political allies if a country like China ever abandoned the U.S. debt market.

But the list of countries prepared to step in as buyers when U.S. Treasury officials try to hawk U.S. debt or seek foreign currency loans has probably changed somewhat since Europe became mired in a debt crisis.

To some extent, this plan is also already in effect. Japan and the UK have recently become aggressive buyers of US debt. The hope is, that along with Fed monetization, the dollar will be stabilized. However, as the US government continues to issue more debt, raises the debt ceiling and commits the American people to trillions more in liabilities, this strategy is doomed to fail, as well. How much debt can the UK, another nation in a sovereign debt crisis, continue to purchase? And if China pulls out, will Japan continue to throw good money after bad?

Plan D

“The U.S. government should have and maybe still could call on the people of the U.S. to invest in U.S. debt,” said David Walker, a former U.S. comptroller general who heads an advocacy group calling on the government to curb the U.S. budget deficit and borrowings.

…a confrontation (e.g. Taiwan, trade war, or resource dispute) would also make it easier for Washington to appeal to the American public to buy its debt for patriotic reasons.

If we do get to a point where the US dollar comes under attack from a Chinese sell-off, it may be hard to convince an already broke and hungry population to invest their last remaining financial life lines into a collapsing currency. This doesn’t mean that our government won’t try. They’ll appeal to our sense of patriotism and tell us that this is the only way to save our currency.

Remember, however, that if it gets to this point it means that all previous plans have failed - the Fed monetization will have done nothing and foreign buyers have dried up. Anyone getting in at this point will be setting themselves up for a total loss.

Not to worry, however, as there’s always…

Plan E

In the past, anytime a government has failed to save itself from excessive and out of control spending, it has turned on its own people. When Plan D proves to be a failure and those with money in their retirement and bank accounts refuse to buy in to the propaganda, the government will take drastic steps. Similar to Argentina and the push by some European countries as of late, the US government will set its cross hairs on your retirement and private pension accounts. We’ve written about it before, and for the time being it’s but a discussion in a Congressional committee.

But when the Federal government and US Treasury are backed into a corner, they will undoubtedly attempt a mandated appropriation of all retirement funds for the greater good. The people will be outraged, sending letters, emails and phone calls to their Congressional representatives, but as we saw with the bailout bill and nationalized health care, the people will be ignored. It will be your patriotic duty, just as it is, according to Vice President Joe Biden, your patriotic duty to pay more taxes.

Doomed

In the end, no amount of monetization or deal making with other countries, or forced appropriations of personal assets will be enough to save the dollar. Why?

Because no one in any position of influence has suggested and/or implemented a workable Plan A.

We are attempting to treat the symptoms of the disease, rather than the disease itself.

Spending is the elephant in the room that is single-handedly responsible for the sovereign debt crisis in which we find ourselves. If we continue to spend with reckless abandon as we have done for decades, then it is simply not possible to ever payoff the money we already owe. Estimates suggest we as a nation owe in excess of $200 trillion in current and future liabilities.

At what point will China and the rest of the world finally say enough is enough?

It won’t be long now.

Author: Mac Slavo
Date: January 20th, 2011
Visit the Author's Website: http://www.SHTFplan.com/